Long-term survival after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 80 years and over.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical aortic valve replacement can be safely performed in people aged 80 years and older with early benefits on both symptomatic and prognostic ground. While new approaches are advocated to treat this elderly and frail population, data on long-term outcomes are not available. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1870 patients aged 80 years and over who underwent first time surgical aortic valve replacement during the period 2000-2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival and comparisons among groups were performed by log-rank test. Cox analysis was used to determine the independent risk factors for late mortality. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 84 years and 53% were male. Isolated aortic valve replacement was performed in 42% of the patients, and coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 956), mitral valve (n = 94) or aortic surgery (n = 69) were associated in the remaining cases. One hundred eighty-one patients (8%) sustained at least 1 postoperative complication (reopening for bleeding or tamponade 3%, renal replacement therapy 3%, new cerebral stroke 1.5%). In-hospital mortality was 3.2% in the overall population (60/1870) and 2.2% after isolated aortic valve replacement (18/790). Survival was 90%, 66%, 31% and 14% at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively, and was similar to the expected survival of a sex- and age-matched population (log-rank P = 0.96). A complicated postoperative course was an independent risk factor for mortality during the follow-up [hazard ratio 1.32 (1.03, 1.68), P = 0.026]. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical aortic valve replacement can be performed with an acceptable early mortality rate and provides excellent long-term survival in people aged 80 years and older.

Aortic Stenosis Prognostication in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for Testing and Validation of a Biomarker-Derived Scoring System.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been established as an important independent risk factor for aortic stenosis. T2DM patients present with a higher degree of valve calcification and left ventricular dysfunction compared to patients without diabetes. This may be due to an increase in incidence and severity of myocardial fibrosis. Currently, there is no reliable method of determining the optimal timing of intervention for a patient with asymptomatic aortic stenosis or predicting when a patient will become symptomatic. Research into serum biomarkers to predict subclinical onset and track progression of aortic stenosis is hampered by the multimodal nature of the pathological processes ultimately responsible for aortic stenosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to prove that an approach using a combination of serum biomarkers and the echocardiographic parameter global longitudinal strain (GLS) can be used to establish baseline status of fibrocalcific aortic valve disease, predict rate of progression, and quantitatively assess any regression of these processes following aortic valve replacement in patients with T2DM. METHODS: Validated serum biomarkers for the separate processes of calcification, inflammation, oxidative stress and fibrosis can be used to quantify onset and rate of progression of aortic stenosis. This, in combination with the echocardiographic parameter GLS, can be compared with other objective investigations of calcification and fibrosis with the aim of developing a quick, noninvasive one-stop assessment of aortic stenosis in patients with T2DM. The serum biomarkers BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide), Gal-3 (Galectin-3), GDF-15 (growth differentiation factor-15), sST2 (soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2), OPG (osteoprotegerin), and microRNA 19b and 21 will be sampled from patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (with and without T2DM), patients with T2DM but without aortic valve disease and healthy volunteers. These patients will also undergo computed tomography (CT) scans for calcium scoring, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantify myocardial fibrosis, and myocardial strain imaging with speckle-tracking echocardiography. Samples of calcified native aortic valve and a biopsy of ventricular myocardium will be examined histologically to determine the quantity and distribution of calcification and fibrosis, and the secretome of these tissue samples will also be analyzed for levels of the same biomarkers as in the serum samples. All patients will be followed up with in 3 months and 12 months for repeat blood sampling, echocardiography, and CT and MRI imaging to assess disease progression or regression. The results of tissue analysis and CT and MRI scanning will be used to validate the findings of the serum biomarkers and echocardiographic assessment. RESULTS: Using all of the information gathered throughout the study will yield a ranking scale for use in the clinic, which will provide each patient with a fibrocalcific profile. This can then be used to recommend an optimal time for intervention. CONCLUSION: A reliable, validated set of serum biomarkers combined with an inexpensive bedside echocardiographic examination can now form the basis of a one-stop outpatient-based assessment service, which will provide an accurate risk assessment in patients with aortic stenosis at first contact. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/13186.

Early Hemodynamic Performance of the Crown PRT Aortic Prosthesis: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Currently, only limited data are available on the rate of hemodynamic progression with clinical outcome in patients receiving the latest Crown PRT aortic prosthesis. The study aim was to report clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in 55 consecutive patients for a follow up of up to one year after Crown PRT implantation. METHODS: Between February and September 2015, a total of 55 patients (34 males, 21 females; mean age 77.3 ± 1.2 years) underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the latest LivaNova Crown PRT bioprosthesis at the authors' institution. Left ventricular function was preserved in 79% of patients. Data relating to the patients' clinical, echocardiographic and functional capacities were obtained prospectively. RESULTS: There were no in-hospital deaths. Significant perioperative complications included stroke (3.6%), atrial fibrillation (27%), and permanent pacemaker insertion (1.8%). Pre-discharge echocardiography demonstrated peak (PG) and mean (MG) transprosthetic gradients of 24.4 ± 10.4 mmHg and 12.9 ± 6.2 mmHg, respectively. The Doppler velocity index (DVI) was 0.49 ± 0.13, and the effective orifice area index (EOAi) 0.89 ± 0.12 cm2/m2. At a mean follow up of 1.3 ± 0.3 years, the transprosthetic gradients, DVI and EOAi were not significantly different from postoperative or pre-discharge values. The patients' NYHA status was I or II in 95% of cases, and the mean left ventricular mass had decreased by 36% at the end of follow up. CONCLUSIONS: The Crown PRT is an effective bioprosthesis, with a low incidence of valve-related complications comparable to those of other current bioprostheses. The bioprosthesis demonstrated satisfactory results in terms of hemodynamics and freedom from reoperation.

Feasibility of a novel, synthetic, self-assembling peptide for suture-line haemostasis in cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUD: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of PuraStat®, a novel haemostatic agent, in achieving suture line haemostasis in a wide range of cardiac surgical procedures and surgery of the thoracic aorta. METHODS: A prospective, non-randomised study was conducted at our institution. Operative data on fifty consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery where PuraStat® was utilised in cases of intraoperative suture line bleeding was prospectively collected. Questionnaires encompassing multiple aspects of the ease of use and efficacy of PuraStat® were completed by ten surgeons (five consultants and five senior registrars) and analysed to gauge the performance of the product. RESULTS: No major adverse cardiac events were reported in this cohort. Complications such as atrial fibrillation, pacemaker requirement and pleural effusions were comparable to the national average. Mean blood product use of packed red cells, platelets, fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and cryoprecipitate was below the national average. There was one incidence of re-exploration, however this was due to pericardial constriction rather than bleeding. Analysis of questionnaire responses revealed that surgeons consistently rated PuraStat® highly (between a score of 7 and 10 in the various subcategories). The transparent nature or PuraStat® allowed unobscured visualisation of suture sites and possessed excellent qualities in terms of adherence to site of application. The application of PuraStat® did not interfere with the use of other haemostatic agents or manipulation of the suture site by the surgeon. CONCLUSION: PuraStat® is an easy-to-use and effective haemostatic agent in a wide range of cardiac and aortic surgical procedures.