[State of affairs and optimization of plastic surgery training in France]. / État des lieux et optimisation de la formation à la chirurgie plastique en France.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been growing for several years among masters, as to the quality and quantity of training in plastic surgery in France. They are mainly based on the reduction in the working time of residents, the appearance of new residents from generation Z to be trained, and finally the multidisciplinarity of plastic surgery in the current context of overspecialization of training center. METHODS: In order to objectify these concerns, a survey was carried out among French residents and young heads of plastic surgery to assess their training in the specialty since 2019. We then looked in the law for possibilities to alleviate these concerns. RESULTS: All the respondents think that their training in the specialty is incomplete, and few of them have been able to supplement it with rotations outside the subdivision or visits from private practitioners. However, in the law, it is possible to carry out: three residents rotations outside the subdivision, clinics rotations and international exchanges. DISCUSSION: At the end of this analysis, we propose three solutions to optimize training in plastic surgery in France: a system of exchange of residents, the opening of residents rotations in clinics, and finally, to facilitate the realization of operating aids with private practitioners. CONCLUSION: With these solutions, the field of training for residents could extend from one region to the whole of France. These solutions could easily be applied to other specialties, surgical and medical.

Triple flap technique for vulvar reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Perineal defects are encountered ever more frequently, in the treatment of vulvar cancers or abdominoperineal resection. The surgical treatment of vulvar cancer leads to significant skin defect. The aim of the reconstruction is not to provide volume but rather to resurface perineum. We propose a new solution to cover the extensive skin defect remaining after excision. METHODS: We report 3 patients who underwent large excision for vulvar cancer, with lymph node dissection. For reconstruction, we performed 3 advancement flaps. Two V-Y flaps cantered on the infra-gluteal folds and based on pudendal perforator arteries were used to cover the postero-lateral parts of the defect. The third advancement flap from the superior aspect of the defect was a Y-V Mons pubis flap. RESULTS: The defects were successfully covered by the 3 flap technique. The first patient suffered a non-union that slowly healed by secondary intention. For the other cases, we used the same technique, but applied negative pressure wound therapy on the sutures, with excellent results. CONCLUSION: The 3 flap technique is a simple and reliable method and the donor site morbidity is minimal. It can be realised without changing the position of the patient after tumour excision, and does not require delicate perforator dissection. This surgical option can be easily applied, allowing better management of these cases.