Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 54(5): 260-269, mayo 2018. map, tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-176140

RESUMO

Introducción: La prevalencia de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) en Argentina no había sido estudiada. Objetivos: Determinar la prevalencia de EPOC y rasgos clínicos relevantes en una muestra representativa. Material y métodos: Estudio de corte transversal en población ≥40 años en 6 aglomerados urbanos seleccionada aleatoriamente mediante muestreo por conglomerados. Se aplicó una encuesta estructurada y espirometrías pre y postbroncodilatador (PBD). Se definió EPOC en quienes presentaban un cociente FEV1/FVC PBD<0,7. Se estimó la prevalencia total y para cada aglomerado con intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC). Resultados: Se realizaron 4.599 encuestas y 3.999 espirometrías, de las cuales 3.469 fueron útiles (86,8%). La prevalencia de EPOC fue de 14,5% (IC: 13,4-15,7). La distribución de los casos compatibles con EPOC según FEV1 (GOLD-2017) fue: 1: 38% (IC: 34-43); 2: 52% (IC: 47-56); 3: 10% (IC: 7-13); y 4: 1% (IC: 0,-2) y de acuerdo al modelo combinado ABCD (GOLD 2017): A: 52% (IC: 47-56); B: 43% (IC: 39-48); C: 1% (IC: 0-2) y D: 4% (IC: 2-6). El subdiagnóstico fue del 77,4% (IC 73,7-81,1%) y el error diagnóstico de 60,7% (IC 55,1-66,3%). Encontramos asociación significativa de presencia de EPOC con edad (OR 3,77 en 50-59 años a 19,23 en >80 años), sexo masculino (OR: 1,62; IC: 1,31-2), tabaquismo (OR: 1,95; IC: 1,49-2,54), nivel socieconómico bajo (OR: 1,33; IC: 1,02-1,73) y antecedentes de tuberculosis (OR: 3,3; IC: 1,43-7,62). Conclusiones: Se estima que más de 2,3 millones de argentinos padecen EPOC con elevada tasa de subdiagnóstico y error diagnóstico


Introduction: The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been studied in Argentina. Objectives: To determine the prevalence and relevant clinical characteristics of COPD in a representative sample. Material and methods: We performed a cross-sectional study in a population of adults aged ≥ 40 years randomly selected by cluster sampling in 6 urban locations. Subjects answered a structured survey and performed pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry (PBD). COPD was defined as FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7 predicted value. The total prevalence was estimated for each cluster with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Of 4,599 surveys and 3,999 spirometries, 3,469 were considered of adequate quality (86.8%) for our study. The prevalence of COPD was 14.5% (CI: 13.4-15.7). The distribution of COPD cases according to FEV1 (GOLD 2017) was stage 1: 38% (CI: 34-43); stage 2: 52% (CI: 47-56); stage 3: 10% (CI: 7-13); and stage 4: 1% (CI: 0-2), and according to the refined ABCD (GOLD 2017) assessment: A: 52% (CI: 47-56); B: 43% (CI: 39-48); C: 1% (CI: 0-2); D: 4% (CI: 2-6). The rate of underdiagnosis was 77.4% (CI 73.7-81.1%) and diagnostic error 60.7% (CI 55.1-66.3%). A significant association was found between COPD and age (OR 3.77 in individuals 50-59 years of age and 19.23 in those > 80 years), male gender (OR 1.62; CI 1.31-2), smoking (OR 1.95; CI 1.49-2.54), low socioeconomic status (OR 1.33; CI 1.02-1.73), and previous tuberculosis (OR 3.3; CI 1.43-7.62). Conclusions: We estimate that more than 2.3 million Argentineans have COPD, with high rates of underdiagnosis and diagnostic error


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , Argentina/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Espirometria/métodos , Intervalos de Confiança , Inquéritos e Questionários , Promoção da Saúde , Espirometria , Modelos Logísticos
2.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 54(3): 140-148, mar. 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-172451

RESUMO

Introduction: Geographical variations may impact outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We evaluated differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes between patients enrolled in Latin America compared with the rest of the world (RoW) in the TIOtropium Safety and Performance In Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) trial. Methods: TIOSPIR(R), a 2-3-year, randomized, double-blind trial (n=17116; treated set), compared safety and efficacy of once-daily tiotropium Respimat® 5 and 2.5μg with tiotropium HandiHaler® 18μg. This post-hoc analysis pooled data from all treatment arms to assess mortality, exacerbations, cardiac events, and serious adverse events (SAEs) between both regions. Results: At baseline, patients enrolled in Latin America (n=1000) versus RoW (n=16116) were older, with higher pack-years of smoking history and more exacerbations, but less cardiac history. In this analysis, patients in Latin America versus RoW had an increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.52 [1.24-1.86]; P<.0001) or moderate-to-severe exacerbation (HR [95% CI]: 1.29 [1.18-1.41]; P<.0001), but a lower risk of severe exacerbation (HR [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.68-0.98]; P=.0333). SAE rates in Latin America were lower versus RoW (incidence rate ratio [IRR] [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.72-0.92]), including cardiac disorders (IRR [95% CI]: 0.68 [0.48-0.97]). Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events were similar (HR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.71-1.40]; P=.9677). Conclusions: TIOSPIR® patients in Latin America had a higher risk of death or moderate-to-severe exacerbation, but a lower risk of severe exacerbation than those in RoW. Geographical differences may impact outcomes in COPD trials (AU)


Introducción: Las variaciones geográficas pueden afectar a los resultados en la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). Evaluamos las diferencias en las características basales y los resultados de los pacientes incluidos en Latinoamérica en comparación con el resto del mundo (RdM) en el ensayo TIOtropium Safety and Performance In Respimat(R)® (TIOSPIR(R)). Métodos: TIOSPIR(R), es un estudio aleatorizado, doble ciego de 2-3 años de duración (n=17.116; conjunto tratado), comparó la seguridad y la eficacia del tiotropio Respimat® una vez al día en dosis de 5 y 2,5μg con respecto al tiotropio HandiHaler® 18μg. Este análisis post-hoc reunió datos de todos los brazos de tratamiento para evaluar la mortalidad, las exacerbaciones, los acontecimientos cardíacos y los acontecimientos adversos graves (AAG) entre ambas regiones. Resultados: Al inicio del estudio, los pacientes reclutados en América Latina (n=1.000) versus RdM (n=16.116) eran de mayor edad, con más paquetes/año de consumo de tabaco en sus antecedentes y más exacerbaciones, pero menos antecedentes cardíacos. En este análisis, los pacientes de Latinoamérica versus RdM tenían un mayor riesgo de muerte (razón de riesgo [HR] intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 1,52 [1,24-1,86]; p<0,0001) y de exacerbación moderada a grave (HR [IC 95%]: 1,29 [1,18-1,41]; p<0,0001), pero menor riesgo de exacerbación grave (HR [IC 95%]: 0,82 [0,68-0,98]; p=0,0333). Las tasas de AAG en Latinoamérica fueron más bajas frente al RdM (tasa de incidencia [IRR] [IC 95%]: 0,82 [0,72-0,92]), incluidos los trastornos cardíacos (IRR [IC 95%]: 0,68 [0,48-0,97]). El riesgo de acontecimientos cardiovasculares adversos mayores fue similar (HR [IC 95%]: 0,99 [0,71-1,40]; p=0,9677). Conclusiones: Los pacientes de TIOSPIR® en Latinoamérica tuvieron un mayor riesgo de muerte y de exacerbación moderada a grave, pero un menor riesgo de exacerbación grave que aquellos en el RdM. Las diferencias geográficas pueden afectar los resultados en los ensayos de la EPOC (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Brometo de Tiotrópio/uso terapêutico , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , América Latina/epidemiologia , Indicadores de Morbimortalidade , Exacerbação dos Sintomas , Fatores de Risco
3.
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed) ; 54(3): 140-148, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29317111

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Geographical variations may impact outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We evaluated differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes between patients enrolled in Latin America compared with the rest of the world (RoW) in the TIOtropium Safety and Performance In Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) trial. METHODS: TIOSPIR®, a 2-3-year, randomized, double-blind trial (n=17116; treated set), compared safety and efficacy of once-daily tiotropium Respimat® 5 and 2.5µg with tiotropium HandiHaler® 18µg. This post-hoc analysis pooled data from all treatment arms to assess mortality, exacerbations, cardiac events, and serious adverse events (SAEs) between both regions. RESULTS: At baseline, patients enrolled in Latin America (n=1000) versus RoW (n=16116) were older, with higher pack-years of smoking history and more exacerbations, but less cardiac history. In this analysis, patients in Latin America versus RoW had an increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.52 [1.24-1.86]; P<.0001) or moderate-to-severe exacerbation (HR [95% CI]: 1.29 [1.18-1.41]; P<.0001), but a lower risk of severe exacerbation (HR [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.68-0.98]; P=.0333). SAE rates in Latin America were lower versus RoW (incidence rate ratio [IRR] [95% CI]: 0.82 [0.72-0.92]), including cardiac disorders (IRR [95% CI]: 0.68 [0.48-0.97]). Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events were similar (HR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.71-1.40]; P=.9677). CONCLUSIONS: TIOSPIR® patients in Latin America had a higher risk of death or moderate-to-severe exacerbation, but a lower risk of severe exacerbation than those in RoW. Geographical differences may impact outcomes in COPD trials.


Assuntos
Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Brometo de Tiotrópio/uso terapêutico , Administração por Inalação , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Broncodilatadores/efeitos adversos , Progressão da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Geografia Médica , Saúde Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Prognóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Fumar/epidemiologia , Brometo de Tiotrópio/efeitos adversos
4.
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed) ; 54(5): 260-269, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29221827

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been studied in Argentina. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and relevant clinical characteristics of COPD in a representative sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in a population of adults aged ≥ 40 years randomly selected by cluster sampling in 6 urban locations. Subjects answered a structured survey and performed pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry (PBD). COPD was defined as FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7 predicted value. The total prevalence was estimated for each cluster with its 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Of 4,599 surveys and 3,999 spirometries, 3,469 were considered of adequate quality (86.8%) for our study. The prevalence of COPD was 14.5% (CI: 13.4-15.7). The distribution of COPD cases according to FEV1 (GOLD 2017) was stage 1: 38% (CI: 34-43); stage 2: 52% (CI: 47-56); stage 3: 10% (CI: 7-13); and stage 4: 1% (CI: 0-2), and according to the refined ABCD (GOLD 2017) assessment: A: 52% (CI: 47-56); B: 43% (CI: 39-48); C: 1% (CI: 0-2); D: 4% (CI: 2-6). The rate of underdiagnosis was 77.4% (CI 73.7-81.1%) and diagnostic error 60.7% (CI 55.1-66.3%). A significant association was found between COPD and age (OR 3.77 in individuals 50-59 years of age and 19.23 in those > 80 years), male gender (OR 1.62; CI 1.31-2), smoking (OR 1.95; CI 1.49-2.54), low socioeconomic status (OR 1.33; CI 1.02-1.73), and previous tuberculosis (OR 3.3; CI 1.43-7.62). CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that more than 2.3 million Argentineans have COPD, with high rates of underdiagnosis and diagnostic error.


Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Argentina/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Erros de Diagnóstico , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Estudos de Amostragem , Distribuição por Sexo , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Tuberculose/epidemiologia , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Capacidade Vital
5.
Medicina (B Aires) ; 63(5): 419-46, 2003.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14628655

RESUMO

Due to the increase in morbidity and mortality from Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), a group of chest physicians updates the basic knowledge on COPD since the last Consensus in 1994 in order to prepare guidelines for its diagnosis, prevention and treatment. The authors review the definition of COPD together with the most recent information on its pathophysiology. The clinical presentation is summarized together with functional evaluation and imaging. Early diagnosis by means of functional testing (i.e., spirometry) is stressed, emphasizing smoking cessation as the only measure that has been shown to alter the outcome of the disease. Smoking cessation strategies are described as well as pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment. In the pharmacological section, the use of inhaled bronchodilators (anticholinergic, beta 2 adrenergic agonists or both) is considered the first option for treatment. Long acting bronchodilators improve patient compliance and treatment effectiveness. Inhaled corticosteroids are indicated for patients with severe airways obstruction and known response to corticosteroids. These agents can diminish the number of exacerbations. Annual influenza vaccination is recommended in all patients. In the non-pharmacological section, surgery for emphysema is suggested in particular cases. Rehabilitation, including exercise training, kinesitherapy and nutrition, is a useful tool for patients who are physically disabled. Long-term oxygen therapy at home improves survival in patients with severe chronic hypoxemia. Other therapeutic interventions such as non-invasive home ventilation have specific indications. Acute exacerbations must be aggressively treated with oxygen, corticosteroids, antibiotics, combination of bronchodilators, and eventually respiratory support. The role of public education of the patients and their families is essential in the prevention and treatment of the disease.


Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Argentina , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Fatores de Risco
6.
Medicina (B.Aires) ; 63(5/1): 419-446, 2003. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-352710

RESUMO

Debido ai aumento de Ia morbi mortalidad de Ia enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC), especialistas en medicina respiratoria actualizan los conocimientos básicos acerca de esta enfermedad desde el último Consenso Ilevado a cabo en 1994 para efectuar recomendaciones para su diagnóstico, prevención y tratamiento. Los autores revisan Ia definición de EPOC, conjuntamente con los últimos conocimìentos de Ia fisiopatología de Ia enfermedad. Se resume Ia presentación clínica, diagnóstico por imágenes y evaluación funcional. Se enfatiza ia importancia dei diagnóstico precoz mediante Ia exploración funcional y Ia prevención a través de Ia cesación dei tabaquismo, única medida capaz de alterar Ia evolución. Se describen Ias estrategias para dejar de fumar, así como el tratamiento farmacológico y no farmacológico. En el primero, Ia administración de broncodilatadores inhalados anticolinérgicos, beta 2 agonistas adrenérgicos o ambos son Ia primera opción. Los broncodilatadores de acción prolongada mejoran Ia adherencia ai tratamiento y su efectìvidad. Los corticoides inhalados se indican en pacientes con marcada obstrucción ai flujo aéreo y respuesta conocida a corticoides. Su uso disminuye Ia frecuencia de Ias exacerbaciones. La vacunación antigripal anual está recomendada en todos los pacientes. Con respecto a Ias intervenciones no farmacológicas, Ia cirugía deienfisema se recomienda en especiales circunstancias. La rehabilitación que incluya ejercicios, kinesioterapia y nutrición, es una herramienta útil en pacientes con limitación en Ia actividad física habitual. La oxigenoterapia domiciliaria prolongada mejora Ia sobrevida de pacientes con hipoxemia crónica severa. Otras intervenciones terapéuticas como Ia ventilación no invasiva domiciliaria tienen indicación muy específica. Las exacerbaciones agudas deben ser tratadas agresivamente con oxigeno, corticoides, antibióticos, asociación de broncodilatadores, y eventualmente asistencia respiratoria. El rol de Ia educación pública, dei paciente y su familia, es fundamen tal en Ia prevención y tratamiento de esta enfermedad.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Argentina , Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Fatores de Risco
7.
Medicina [B.Aires] ; 63(5/1): 419-446, 2003. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | BINACIS | ID: bin-5090

RESUMO

Debido ai aumento de Ia morbi mortalidad de Ia enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC), especialistas en medicina respiratoria actualizan los conocimientos básicos acerca de esta enfermedad desde el último Consenso Ilevado a cabo en 1994 para efectuar recomendaciones para su diagnóstico, prevención y tratamiento. Los autores revisan Ia definición de EPOC, conjuntamente con los últimos conocimýentos de Ia fisiopatología de Ia enfermedad. Se resume Ia presentación clínica, diagnóstico por imágenes y evaluación funcional. Se enfatiza ia importancia dei diagnóstico precoz mediante Ia exploración funcional y Ia prevención a través de Ia cesación dei tabaquismo, única medida capaz de alterar Ia evolución. Se describen Ias estrategias para dejar de fumar, así como el tratamiento farmacológico y no farmacológico. En el primero, Ia administración de broncodilatadores inhalados anticolinérgicos, beta 2 agonistas adrenérgicos o ambos son Ia primera opción. Los broncodilatadores de acción prolongada mejoran Ia adherencia ai tratamiento y su efectývidad. Los corticoides inhalados se indican en pacientes con marcada obstrucción ai flujo aéreo y respuesta conocida a corticoides. Su uso disminuye Ia frecuencia de Ias exacerbaciones. La vacunación antigripal anual está recomendada en todos los pacientes. Con respecto a Ias intervenciones no farmacológicas, Ia cirugía deienfisema se recomienda en especiales circunstancias. La rehabilitación que incluya ejercicios, kinesioterapia y nutrición, es una herramienta útil en pacientes con limitación en Ia actividad física habitual. La oxigenoterapia domiciliaria prolongada mejora Ia sobrevida de pacientes con hipoxemia crónica severa. Otras intervenciones terapéuticas como Ia ventilación no invasiva domiciliaria tienen indicación muy específica. Las exacerbaciones agudas deben ser tratadas agresivamente con oxigeno, corticoides, antibióticos, asociación de broncodilatadores, y eventualmente asistencia respiratoria. El rol de Ia educación pública, dei paciente y su familia, es fundamen tal en Ia prevención y tratamiento de esta enfermedad.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Argentina/epidemiologia , Conferências de Consenso como Assunto
8.
Medicina [B Aires] ; 63(5): 419-46, 2003.
Artigo em Espanhol | BINACIS | ID: bin-38844

RESUMO

Due to the increase in morbidity and mortality from Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), a group of chest physicians updates the basic knowledge on COPD since the last Consensus in 1994 in order to prepare guidelines for its diagnosis, prevention and treatment. The authors review the definition of COPD together with the most recent information on its pathophysiology. The clinical presentation is summarized together with functional evaluation and imaging. Early diagnosis by means of functional testing (i.e., spirometry) is stressed, emphasizing smoking cessation as the only measure that has been shown to alter the outcome of the disease. Smoking cessation strategies are described as well as pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment. In the pharmacological section, the use of inhaled bronchodilators (anticholinergic, beta 2 adrenergic agonists or both) is considered the first option for treatment. Long acting bronchodilators improve patient compliance and treatment effectiveness. Inhaled corticosteroids are indicated for patients with severe airways obstruction and known response to corticosteroids. These agents can diminish the number of exacerbations. Annual influenza vaccination is recommended in all patients. In the non-pharmacological section, surgery for emphysema is suggested in particular cases. Rehabilitation, including exercise training, kinesitherapy and nutrition, is a useful tool for patients who are physically disabled. Long-term oxygen therapy at home improves survival in patients with severe chronic hypoxemia. Other therapeutic interventions such as non-invasive home ventilation have specific indications. Acute exacerbations must be aggressively treated with oxygen, corticosteroids, antibiotics, combination of bronchodilators, and eventually respiratory support. The role of public education of the patients and their families is essential in the prevention and treatment of the disease.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...