RESUMO
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a recently described form of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma now formally recognized by the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. The aim of this paper is to report the first case of BIA-ALCL diagnosed in a pregnant patient. It is well known that BIA-ALCL appears as an indolent lymphoma with a good prognosis when diag-nosed at early stages and clinical guidelines for its management have been clearly published. Nevertheless, they lack a standardized approach for BIA-ALCL during pregnancy. With limited experience in our case, treatment has been safely postponed after term without affecting patient’s overall prognosis and without fetal complication. The fact that the disease was diagnosed at an early stage (stage I) undoubtedly influenced the course of treatment. A multidisciplinary approach weighing the risks and benefits of treatment is of paramount importance in order to ensure the best possible outcome for both the mother and her child and clinical update guidelines should be issued.
RESUMO
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a recently described form of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma now formally recognized by the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. The aim of this paper is to report the first case of BIA-ALCL diagnosed in a pregnant patient. It is well known that BIA-ALCL appears as an indolent lymphoma with a good prognosis when diag-nosed at early stages and clinical guidelines for its management have been clearly published. Nevertheless, they lack a standardized approach for BIA-ALCL during pregnancy. With limited experience in our case, treatment has been safely postponed after term without affecting patient’s overall prognosis and without fetal complication. The fact that the disease was diagnosed at an early stage (stage I) undoubtedly influenced the course of treatment. A multidisciplinary approach weighing the risks and benefits of treatment is of paramount importance in order to ensure the best possible outcome for both the mother and her child and clinical update guidelines should be issued.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lymph node ratio (LNR)-the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) over the number of excised LNs after lymphadenectomy-is a prognostic factor for many solid tumors, but controversies still exist for skin melanoma. We investigated the prognostic relevance of LNR in melanoma patients and formulated a proposal for considering the LNR in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N staging system. METHODS: Retrospective data of 2,526 melanoma patients with LN metastasis from nine Italian institutions were collected in a multicenter database. The prognostic value of the LNR (categorized as A, ≤0.1; B, 0.11-0.25; and C, >0.25) was assessed by multivariable survival analysis. RESULTS: LNR was a significant independent prognostic factor for melanoma-specific survival (LNR B vs. A: hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95 % CI 1.16-1.87, p = 0.002; LNR C vs. A: HR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.29-2.61, p = 0.001). The LNR had prognostic value in patients with AJCC N1a (one positive LN after sentinel LN biopsy [SLNB], HR 2.33, 95 % CI 1.49-3.63, p < 0.001) and N2a (two to three positive LNs after SLNB, HR 1.62, 95 % CI 1.09-2.40, p = 0.016) substages, but not in those with N1b (one clinically positive LN, p = 0.765), N2b (two to three clinically positive LNs, p = 0.165), and N3 (≥ four positive LNs, p = 0.084) substages. CONCLUSION: The LNR is a prognostic factor in melanoma patients with one (AJCC N1a) and two to three (AJCC N2a) positive LNs after SLNB. This easy-to-obtain parameter should be considered for the staging of melanoma patients with LN metastasis, along with the number of positive LNs.
