Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF25-75%) as a Clinical Endpoint in Children and Adolescents with Symptomatic Asthma Receiving Tiotropium: A Post Hoc Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In pediatric patients with asthma, measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) may be normal or may not correlate with symptom severity. Forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of the vital capacity (FEF25-75%) is a potentially more sensitive parameter for assessing peripheral airway function. This post hoc analysis compared FEF25-75% with FEV1 as an endpoint to assess bronchodilator responsiveness in children with asthma. METHODS: Change from baseline in trough FEF25-75% and trough FEV1 following treatment with either tiotropium (5 µg or 2.5 µg) or placebo Respimat® was analyzed in four phase III trials in children (aged 6-11 years) and adolescents (aged 12-17 years) with symptomatic moderate (VivaTinA-asthma® and PensieTinA-asthma®) and mild (CanoTinA-asthma® and RubaTinA-asthma®) asthma. Data from all treatment arms were pooled and correlations between FEF25-75% and FEV1 were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1590 patients were included in the analysis. Tiotropium Respimat® consistently improved FEF25-75% and FEV1 versus placebo, although in adolescents with severe asthma, the observed improvements were not statistically significant. Improvements in FEF25-75% response with tiotropium versus placebo were largely more pronounced than improvements in FEV1. Statistical assessment of the correlation of FEV1 and FEF25-75% showed moderate-to-high correlations (Pearson's correlation coefficients 0.73-0.80). CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients, FEF25-75% may be a more sensitive measure to detect treatment response, certainly to tiotropium, than FEV1 and should be evaluated as an additional lung function measurement.

Prospective, open-label evaluation of a new albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler with integrated dose counter.

BACKGROUND: Albuterol multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) with an integrated dose counter allows patients to track the number of remaining doses and to simplify dosing by eliminating the need to coordinate inhalation with actuation associated with metered-dose inhalers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functionality, reliability, and accuracy of the albuterol MDPI integrated dose counter in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: This open-label, phase III study enrolled patients ages ≥4 years with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients who demonstrated adequate MDPI inhaler technique and ≥90% compliance with dosing and diary completion during a run-in period qualified for treatment with albuterol MDPI with a dose counter (2 inhalations/dose; 90 µg/inhalation) twice daily for up to 50 days. Patient-reported counter readings and patient-reported actuations were recorded in daily diaries and were used to assess dose counter accuracy. An ease-of-use and satisfaction questionnaire was given at the final visit. RESULTS: A total of 317 patients were enrolled in the study. The dose-cycle undercount (i.e., actuation occurred, but the counter display did not count down) was 2.05 per 200 actuations. The estimated mean ± standard error absolute value of the total discrepancy size after 200 actuations was 2.07 ± 0.140. Most patients (83%) were somewhat or very satisfied, and >90% were satisfied with ease of holding and/or handling, using and taking, and inhaling a dose from the device. The albuterol MDPI was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The albuterol MDPI dose counter functioned reliably and accurately. Albuterol MDPI was well tolerated, with a high degree of patient satisfaction in a real-world setting. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01857323.

Prospective, open-label assessment of albuterol sulfate hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler with new integrated dose counter.

Metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) allow patients who require therapy for various respiratory diseases to deliver these therapies directly to the airways via inhalation. MDIs are designed to contain more propellant than required for administration of the labeled number of actuations; therefore, the amount of active medication/actuation remaining after administration of the labeled number of actuations may result in a lower than therapeutic dose of active medication. An MDI with an integrated dose counter provides the only reliable means by which a patient can track the amount of medication remaining in the MDI. This study evaluated the functionality, reliability, accuracy, and patient satisfaction with albuterol sulfate hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) MDI with a new integrated dose counter in the clinical setting. Patients aged ≥4 years with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or both, participated in this phase 4, prospective, open-label study. Treatment was twice-daily dosing with albuterol HFA MDI at 90 micrograms with dose counter for either 5 or 7 weeks. Concordance/agreement between daily patient recordings of actuations and counter readings was assessed with five discrepancy types: fire not count (undercount; primary end point), count not fire (overcount), fire count up within a dose (counter reading increased, instead of decreased, after MDI was actuated), count unknown fire (counter number at the beginning of a dosing session was less than counter number at the end of the previous session), and count up unknown fire (counter number at the beginning of a dosing session was greater than counter number at the end of the previous session). Responses to twelve questions designed to evaluate confidence, ease of use, and patient satisfaction were also analyzed. Overall discrepancy rate was 1.87 per 200 actuations. Primary end point (fire not count rate) was 0.30 per 200 actuations. Overall, ~95-97% of patients were "very satisfied" or "somewhat satisfied" with the albuterol HFA MDI with dose counter, its ease of use, and the ability to tell when it should be replaced. The albuterol HFA MDI with new integrated dose counter functioned reliably and accurately in the clinical setting. Overall patient satisfaction was high with the albuterol HFA MDI with new integrated dose counter and the device was shown to function reliably and accurately. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01302587.

Fluticasone furoate nasal spray is effective and well tolerated for perennial allergic rhinitis in adolescents and adults.

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS), an intranasal corticosteroid, has been shown to be effective in perennial allergic rhinitis in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies but has been less extensively studied in perennial allergic rhinitis than seasonal allergic rhinitis. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FFNS in perennial allergic rhinitis in adolescents and adults ≥12 years of age. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study (FFU111439), patients ≥12 years old with perennial allergic rhinitis received FFNS, 110 micrograms (n = 160), or placebo (n = 155) q.d. for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Over the entire treatment period, FFNS was significantly (p < 0.05) more effective than placebo with respect to mean changes from baseline in daily reflective total nasal symptoms (primary end point), morning and evening reflective total nasal symptoms, daily reflective individual nasal symptoms, morning predose instantaneous total and individual nasal symptoms, and morning and evening peak nasal inspiratory flow. FFNS did not show a statistically significant difference from placebo in comparisons of ocular symptom measures. Clinically meaningful improvement versus placebo was observed on the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardised Activities overall score. Adverse events reported in >3% of patients in a treatment group and reported more frequently with FFNS than placebo were epistaxis (15% FFNS, 8% placebo) and nasopharyngitis (5% FFNS, 1% placebo). CONCLUSION: Once-daily FFNS was well tolerated and more effective than placebo at improving nasal symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis in adolescents and adults ≥12 years of age.

Fluticasone furoate nasal spray: a single treatment option for the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone furoate (USAN-approved name) is a novel, enhanced-affinity glucocorticoid administered in a unique side-actuated device for the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily fluticasone furoate nasal spray, 110 microg, in patients aged 12 years or older with fall SAR. METHODS: Patients (n = 299) received fluticasone furoate or placebo for 2 weeks in this double-blind, parallel-group randomized study. Patients evaluated nasal and ocular symptoms using a 4-point categoric scale. Efficacy was assessed on the basis of the mean change from baseline in reflective and instantaneous total nasal symptom scores and reflective total ocular symptom scores. RESULTS: Fluticasone furoate produced significantly greater improvements than placebo in daily reflective total nasal symptom score (-1.473, P < .001; primary end point), morning predose instantaneous total nasal symptom score (-1.375, P < .001), daily reflective total ocular symptom score (-0.600, P = .004), and patient-rated overall response to therapy (P < .001). The onset of therapeutic effect occurred at 8 hours after initial administration. Fluticasone furoate was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Fluticasone furoate, 110 microg once daily, was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of nasal symptoms of SAR in patients aged 12 years and older. Treatment also produced significant improvements in ocular symptoms. Fluticasone furoate was fast acting, as indicated by an 8-hour onset of action, and provided 24-hour symptom control. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: New treatments for the bothersome symptoms of SAR are needed. One such treatment, fluticasone furoate nasal spray, provides effective relief of the symptom profile of SAR.