Managing Small Joint Septic Arthritis of the Hand.

Background: Current guidance for the management of septic arthritis is limited to large joints and, therefore, unspecific to the small joints of the hand, which may present differently, require different diagnostic approaches, and have different complications. The aim of this article was to review current treatment trends for the management of small joint septic arthritis (SJSA) of the hand and offer guidelines for its management. Methods: A systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines and a survey distributed to Fellows of the British Society for Surgery of the Hand to establish expert opinion. The review and survey were combined to present a set of specific SJSA of the hand infection guidelines. Results: All 20 included studies recommended physical drainage of infected joint fluid; subsequent lavage and early antibiotic therapy, with physiotherapist-guided joint mobilisation. Statistical analysis of the 77 responses to our survey revealed that (in order of preference) the diagnosis was made by history and examination, blood tests, joint aspiration and vital signs; and for interventions: joint elevation and intravenous antibiotics; then joint washout repeated within 48 hours, if necessary. Conclusions: Small joint infection differs from large joint infection because it is difficult to obtain joint aspirate without damaging or opening the joint. We, therefore, recommend utilising exclusion blood tests, imaging and the clinical picture to establish the diagnosis and implement early treatment and rehabilitation. Level of Evidence: Level III.

The helpful twin: Skin graft donation in a challenging burn case.

OBJECTIVES: This is the first report of a successful skin grafting between monozygotic twins in the United Kingdom (UK). We discuss the process of assessing the suitability of the patients for the procedure, gaining approval and extraordinary funding from the relevant bodies, developing a new protocol within the trust and the logistics of carrying out the procedure safely. METHODS: We describe the case of a 61-year-old paraplegic woman with insensate legs who presented with a 5-week old 2% TBSA deep dermal to full-thickness scald burn which was sustained accidentally in the shower. In view of the prolonged healing time and the risk of burn wound infection, skin grafting of the wound was the recommended treatment. However, given the high risk of impaired wound healing in denervated skin of quadriplegic individuals, the patient was warned of potential donor site wound healing problems. This, along with concerns over the donor site area interfering with the use of her mobility aids prompted her homozygotic twin sister to donate the necessary skin. The process was risk assessed and approval was sought from the Trust's Caldicott Guardian, NHS Specialist Commissioners and the Trust's Human Tissue Authority (HTA) Designated Individual (DI). A new protocol for the pathway in line with HTA guidance was developed. Specific patient information documents were written, psychological assessments performed and specific consent for skin donation undertaken. One week prior to and again on the day of the procedure, the donor was serologically screened for communicable diseases. A donor medical and social history assessment was also carried out. RESULTS: There was 100% graft take at day 5 post-surgery. The sister's donor site healed well by day 13. At 3 months, there were no signs of hypertrophic scarring. No additional outpatient or dressing clinic appointment were required. DISCUSSION: This is the first case of successful skin homografting between monozygotic twins in the United Kingdom. Donation of skin grafts between such patients, however, requires clinical justification, twin zygosity DNA testing, approval from the HTA and NHS commissioners with appropriate protocols and procedures in place to ensure patient safety. Liaising with the local Tissue Bank can facilitate this process. CONCLUSION: Skin grafting between identical twins is a feasible and successful procedure and offers an alternative treatment modality when wound healing in the recipient twin is suboptimal or when severely burnt. This principle should also be considered, in appropriate cases, for composite tissue transfer in situations where complex reconstructions are required.

Breast reconstruction with Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator free flap: 8 years of experience.

INTRODUCTION: The SGAP flap represents an alternative for autologous breast reconstruction when DIEP is not available. In this article, we report eight years of experience in breast reconstruction using SGAP free flap and discuss our results, how our procedures have evolved, the outcomes and complications rates and how to perform this procedure efficiently while managing the challenges inherent to this type of flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from June 2009 and June 2017. Patients requiring SGAP flap breast reconstruction were enrolled. Donor site availability was categorised into 4 classes according to the availability of tissue. An ad hoc outcome scale was created to standardise the results and ensure data comparability. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were enrolled in the study. We recorded 18 cases of excellent results, 57 good, 30 moderate and 14 poor. Our results show that donor site class impacts complications and patient outcome. The odds ratio analysis demonstrated that the third class donor site has a protective impact on complications and has a direct correlation with good patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: SGAP flap can provide very good outcomes, and it should be considered as another option when DIEP is not available. Patient selection and efficiency are the keys to achieve optimal results and minimise complications. Although this flap is available for patients with a low BMI, the donor site has to provide enough tissue to achieve symmetry with the contralateral breast and allow a tension-free closure without contour deformity.

Management of a Complex, Multioperated Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fracture.

Background Intra-articular distal radius fractures can have many complications, including radiocarpal osteoarthritis and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) dysfunction leading to pain and restricted wrist function. Case Description We describe the case of a 38-year-old patient who sustained a left distal radius intra-articular fracture, which was treated with volar plating. She developed pain from the radiocarpal joint as a result of intra-articular malunion and was listed for total wrist fusion. On the day of surgery this was converted to a Darrach procedure for minor DRUJ symptoms. This resulted in pain from the DRUJ as a result of instability, in addition to persisting radiocarpal arthritis pain. Due to her subsequent poor wrist function, she presented to the authors and underwent DRUJ arthroplasty with a proximally placed Scheker prosthesis to deal with her DRUJ symptoms and, later, a KinematX radiocarpal hemiarthroplasty for her radiocarpal symptoms. She remains happy with her outcome at 36-month follow-up. Literature Review The complications of the Darrach procedure include painful radioulnar convergence and wrist instability. The Scheker prosthesis allows restoration of stability of the DRUJ with good outcomes and 100% 5-year survival in one series. Sparing the midcarpal joint, the KinematX hemiarthroplasty allows preservation of the dart thrower's motion arc, which is key in many complex wrist movements and functions. Clinical Relevance This case highlights the negative consequences of distal ulna resection and shows both the Scheker and KinematX prostheses as viable, effective means to restore function to young, active patients with posttraumatic radiocarpal arthritis and/or instability.