Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
1.
Neurology ; 90(19): e1692-e1701, 2018 05 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29643084

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with treatment delays in pediatric patients with convulsive refractory status epilepticus (rSE). METHODS: This prospective, observational study was performed from June 2011 to March 2017 on pediatric patients (1 month to 21 years of age) with rSE. We evaluated potential factors associated with increased treatment delays in a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We studied 219 patients (53% males) with a median (25th-75th percentiles [p25-p75]) age of 3.9 (1.2-9.5) years in whom rSE started out of hospital (141 [64.4%]) or in hospital (78 [35.6%]). The median (p25-p75) time from seizure onset to treatment was 16 (5-45) minutes to first benzodiazepine (BZD), 63 (33-146) minutes to first non-BZD antiepileptic drug (AED), and 170 (107-539) minutes to first continuous infusion. Factors associated with more delays to administration of the first BZD were intermittent rSE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.09; p = 0.0467) and out-of-hospital rSE onset (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.11-2.04; p = 0.0467). Factors associated with more delays to administration of the first non-BZD AED were intermittent rSE (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.32-2.4; p = 0.001) and out-of-hospital rSE onset (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.67-3.02; p < 0.0001). None of the studied factors were associated with a delayed administration of continuous infusion. CONCLUSION: Intermittent rSE and out-of-hospital rSE onset are independently associated with longer delays to administration of the first BZD and the first non-BZD AED in pediatric rSE. These factors identify potential targets for intervention to reduce time to treatment.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Estado Epiléptico/tratamento farmacológico , Tempo para o Tratamento , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 47(5): 434-40, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22495970

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine cystic fibrosis (CF) physician adherence to the 2007 CF Foundation (CFF) Pulmonary Guidelines for Chronic Medications. Specifically adherence and barriers to prescribing level A medication recommendations (i.e., inhaled tobramycin and dornase alfa) and level B medication recommendations (i.e., macrolide antibiotics and hypertonic saline) were studied. METHODS: During Spring 2010, the CFF emailed survey invitations to directors of 136 accredited CF care centers treating 50+ CF patients. Directors were asked to forward the invitations to their physician colleagues. One hundred thirty-three surveys were included in the analyses, representing 92 centers. Barriers were conceptualized based on Cabana et al.'s framework for adherence to guidelines. Adherence was assessed via a case vignette. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher outcome expectancy (OR = 1.099, CI 1.010-1.196) and fewer environmental/system barriers (OR = 1.484, CI 1.158-1.902) were significantly associated with Vignette Adherence. A trend for an association between Familiarity and Vignette Adherence (OR = 1.642, CI 0.953-2.828) was evident, while no demographic variables were significantly associated with Vignette Adherence. CONCLUSION: Targeting outcome expectancy and external barriers with multifaceted, ongoing interventions may improve guideline adherence. Pulmonologists are clearly looking for empirical evidence that these medications benefit their patients over the long-term and offset patient treatment burden with improved health.


Assuntos
Fibrose Cística/terapia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Criança , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Desoxirribonuclease I/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tobramicina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 121(3): 149-53, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20055770

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Sparse information on dose-response characteristics for initial antiepileptic drug monotherapy in children with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) is available. The aim of this study is to characterize the therapeutic dose of valproate in children with newly diagnosed IGE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Effect of initial valproate monotherapy and doses associated with seizure freedom were examined in consecutive children with IGE identified from a New Onset Seizure Clinic. RESULTS: Of 84 patients identified, 48 (57%) became seizure-free on valproate monotherapy and another 10 patients became seizure-free but discontinued VPA because of adverse effects. The mean dose in seizure-free children was 15.7 mg/kg/day and over 95% of IGE patients will respond below 25 mg/kg/day. CONCLUSIONS: Half of children became seizure-free on valproate monotherapy and did so at modest doses.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Neurology ; 73(9): 658-64, 2009 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19474413

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the frequency and factors associated with obesity in a cohort of children and adolescents with newly diagnosed untreated epilepsy. METHODS: Body mass index (BMI) Z-scores and percentiles, both adjusted for age, were used as measures for obesity. Potential covariates associated with these BMI measures included age, etiology (cryptogenic, idiopathic, symptomatic), seizure type (generalized, partial, unclear), concomitant medications (stimulants, nonstimulants, none), and insurance status (privately insured, Medicaid). The primary analysis compared the epilepsy patients' BMI Z-scores to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data for healthy children. The secondary analysis compared the epilepsy patients' BMI Z-scores to those of a regional healthy control group. Additional analyses incorporated the secondary outcome measure BMI percentiles indexed for age. RESULTS: Children with newly diagnosed untreated epilepsy had higher BMI Z-scores compared to standard CDC growth charts (p < 0.0001) and the healthy control cohort (p = 0.0002) specifically at both of the 2 tail ends of the distribution. Overall, 38.6% of the epilepsy cohort were overweight or obese (BMI > or =85th percentile for age). Differences in age, etiology, and concomitant nonepilepsy medications were significantly associated with variability in age-adjusted BMI Z-score. Patients in adolescence had higher adjusted BMI Z-scores than younger patients. Patients with symptomatic epilepsy had lower adjusted BMI Z-scores than patients with idiopathic epilepsy. Patients on stimulant psychotropics exhibited lower adjusted BMI Z-scores than patients on no medication. CONCLUSION: Obesity is a common comorbidity in children with newly diagnosed untreated epilepsy and correlates with increasing age, idiopathic etiology, and absence of concomitant medication.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/fisiopatologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Desenvolvimento do Adolescente/fisiologia , Distribuição por Idade , Fatores Etários , Antropometria , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Índice de Massa Corporal , Peso Corporal/fisiologia , Encéfalo/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Criança , Desenvolvimento Infantil/fisiologia , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade/metabolismo , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos
5.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 118(1): 29-41, 2008 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18205880

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Genomic analysis using microarray tools has the potential benefit of enhancing our understanding of neurological diseases. The analysis of these data is complex due to the large amount of data generated. Many tools have been developed to assist with this, but standard methods of analysis of these tools have not been established. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of different analytical methods for gene identification and presents a standardized approach. METHODS: Affymetrix HG-U133 plus 2.0 microarray datasets from two neurological diseases - chronic migraine and new-onset epilepsy - were used as source data and methods of analysis for normalization of data and identification of gene changes were compared. Housekeeping genes were used to identify non-specific changes and gender related genes were used to identify specific changes. RESULTS: Initial normalization of data revealed that 5-10% of the microarray were potential outliers due to technical errors. Two separate methods of analysis (dChip and Bioconductor) identified the same microarray chips as outliers. For specificity and sensitivity testing, performing a per-gene normalization was found to be inferior to standard preprocessing procedures using robust multichip average analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Technical variation in microarray preprocessing may account for chip-to-chip and batch-to-batch variations and outliers need to be removed prior to analysis. Specificity and sensitivity of the final results are best achieved following this identification and removal with standard genomic analysis techniques. Future tools may benefit from the use of standard tools of measurement.


Assuntos
Epilepsia/genética , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/genética , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos/métodos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Criança , Bases de Dados Genéticas , Epilepsia/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/metabolismo , Modelos Genéticos , Controle de Qualidade , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
6.
Neurology ; 66(11): 1654-60, 2006 Jun 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16641323

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) as adjunctive therapy in children (4 to 16 years) with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisted of an 8-week baseline period followed by a 14-week double-blind treatment period. During the treatment period, patients received either placebo or LEV add-on therapy and were up-titrated to a target dose of 60 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-eight patients (intent-to-treat population) provided evaluable data. The reduction in partial-onset seizure frequency per week for LEV adjunctive therapy over placebo adjunctive therapy was significant (26.8%; p = 0.0002; 95% CI 14.0% to 37.6%). A 50% or greater reduction of partial seizure frequency per week was attained in 44.6% of the LEV group (45/101 patients), compared with 19.6% (19/97 patients) receiving placebo (p = 0.0002). Seven (6.9%) LEV-treated patients were seizure-free during the entire double-blind treatment period, compared with one (1.0%) placebo-treated patient. One or more adverse events were reported by 88.1% of LEV-treated patients and 91.8% of placebo patients. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were somnolence, accidental injury, vomiting, anorexia, hostility, nervousness, rhinitis, cough, and pharyngitis. A similar number of patients in each group required a dose reduction or withdrew from the study as a result of an adverse event. CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam adjunctive therapy administered at 60 mg/kg/day is efficacious and well tolerated in children with treatment-resistant partial seizures.


Assuntos
Epilepsias Parciais/diagnóstico , Epilepsias Parciais/tratamento farmacológico , Piracetam/análogos & derivados , Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Levetiracetam , Masculino , Pediatria/métodos , Piracetam/administração & dosagem , Piracetam/efeitos adversos , Efeito Placebo , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 112(4): 214-22, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16146489

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate as monotherapy, using a dose-controlled study design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multinational, randomized, double-blind trial in adults and children (> or =6 years old) with epilepsy that was not being treated when randomized to 400 or 50 mg/day topiramate as target maintenance dosages. In addition to > or =2 lifetime unprovoked seizures, patients had to have one or two partial-onset seizures or generalized-onset tonic-clonic seizures in the 3-month retrospective baseline. The primary efficacy end point was time to first seizure; a secondary efficacy measure was the seizure-free rate at 6 months and 1 year. Double-blind treatment continued until 6 months after the last patient was randomized. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analyses for time to first seizure (intent-to-treat, n = 470) favored 400 mg/day over 50 mg/day (P = 0.0002) as a target maintenance dosage. The first evaluation point with a significant difference (P = 0.046) favoring the higher dose was at day 14 when patients were receiving 100 or 25 mg/day. The probability of being seizure-free at 6 months was 83% in patients randomized to 400 mg/day and 71% in those randomized to 50 mg/day (P = 0.005). Seizure-free rates at 12 months were 76% and 59%, respectively (P = 0.001). Differences favoring the higher dose were significant in patients with partial-onset seizures (P = 0.009) and in those with generalized-onset tonic-clonic seizures (P = 0.005). The most common dose-related adverse events were paresthesia, weight loss, and decreased appetite. Discontinuations due to cognitive-related adverse events were 2% in the 50-mg group and 7% in the 400-mg group. Overall, 7% and 19%, respectively, discontinued with adverse events during the median treatment duration of 9 months. CONCLUSION: Topiramate is effective as monotherapy in adults and children. Because a therapeutic effect emerges during titration, clinicians should adjust dosages in step-wise fashion with intermediate stopping points, e.g., 100 mg/day, to evaluate patient response and achieve the optimal maintenance dosage.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Frutose/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Frutose/administração & dosagem , Frutose/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Topiramato , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Neurology ; 62(8): 1252-60, 2004 Apr 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15111659

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide-reviewed in the order in which these agents received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration) in the treatment of children and adults with newly diagnosed partial and generalized epilepsies. METHODS: A 23-member committee, including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy, evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until September 2002, with selected manual searches up until 2003. RESULTS: There is evidence either from comparative or dose-controlled trials that gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine have efficacy as monotherapy in newly diagnosed adolescents and adults with either partial or mixed seizure disorders. There is also evidence that lamotrigine is effective for newly diagnosed absence seizures in children. Evidence for effectiveness of the new AEDs in newly diagnosed patients with other generalized epilepsy syndromes is lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.


Assuntos
Aminas , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Cicloexanocarboxílicos , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Frutose/análogos & derivados , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico , Acetatos/efeitos adversos , Acetatos/farmacocinética , Acetatos/uso terapêutico , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Carbamazepina/efeitos adversos , Carbamazepina/análogos & derivados , Carbamazepina/farmacocinética , Carbamazepina/uso terapêutico , Criança , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Interações Medicamentosas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/estatística & dados numéricos , Frutose/efeitos adversos , Frutose/farmacocinética , Frutose/uso terapêutico , Gabapentina , Humanos , Lamotrigina , Oxcarbazepina , Topiramato , Resultado do Tratamento , Triazinas/efeitos adversos , Triazinas/farmacocinética , Triazinas/uso terapêutico
9.
Neurology ; 62(8): 1261-73, 2004 Apr 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15111660

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide) in the treatment of children and adults with refractory partial and generalized epilepsies. METHODS: A 23-member committee including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until March 2003. RESULTS: All of the new AEDs were found to be appropriate for adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in adults. Gabapentin can be effective for the treatment of mixed seizure disorders, and gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate for the treatment of refractory partial seizures in children. Limited evidence suggests that lamotrigine and topiramate are also effective for adjunctive treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy in adults and children, as well as treatment of the Lennox Gastaut syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of AED depends upon seizure and/or syndrome type, patient age, concomitant medications, AED tolerability, safety, and efficacy. The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with refractory epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.


Assuntos
Aminas , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Cicloexanocarboxílicos , Epilepsias Parciais/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamento farmacológico , Frutose/análogos & derivados , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico , Acetatos/efeitos adversos , Acetatos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Carbamazepina/efeitos adversos , Carbamazepina/análogos & derivados , Carbamazepina/uso terapêutico , Criança , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Resistência a Medicamentos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/estatística & dados numéricos , Frutose/efeitos adversos , Frutose/uso terapêutico , Gabapentina , Humanos , Isoxazóis/efeitos adversos , Isoxazóis/uso terapêutico , Lamotrigina , Levetiracetam , Ácidos Nipecóticos/efeitos adversos , Ácidos Nipecóticos/uso terapêutico , Oxcarbazepina , Piracetam/efeitos adversos , Piracetam/análogos & derivados , Piracetam/uso terapêutico , Tiagabina , Topiramato , Resultado do Tratamento , Triazinas/efeitos adversos , Triazinas/uso terapêutico , Zonisamida
10.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 109(3): 159-68, 2004 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14763951

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Valproic acid (VPA) is a commonly used anticonvulsant with multiple systemic effects. The purpose of this pilot study is to examine the blood genomic expression pattern associated with VPA therapy in general and secondly VPA efficacy in children with epilepsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using oligonucleotide microarrays, gene expression in whole blood was assessed in pediatric epilepsy patients following treatment with VPA compared with children with epilepsy prior to initiation of anticonvulsant therapy (drug free patients). RESULTS: The expression of 461 genes was altered in VPA patients (n = 11) compared with drug free patients (n = 7), among which a significant number of serine threonine kinases were down-regulated. Expression patterns in children seizure free on VPA therapy (n = 8) demonstrated 434 up-regulated genes, many in mitochondria, compared with VPA children with continuing seizures (n = 3) and drug free seizure patients (n = 7). CONCLUSION: VPA therapy is associated with two significant and unique blood gene expression patterns: chronic VPA monotherapy in general and a separate blood genomic profile correlated with seizure freedom. These expression patterns provide new insight into previously undetected mechanisms of VPA anticonvulsant activity.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , DNA Mitocondrial/genética , Resistência a Medicamentos/genética , Epilepsias Parciais/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsias Parciais/genética , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases/genética , Ácido Valproico/farmacocinética , Ácido Valproico/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Encéfalo/enzimologia , Carbamazepina/farmacocinética , Carbamazepina/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Regulação para Baixo/efeitos dos fármacos , Epilepsias Parciais/enzimologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Transcrição Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Transcrição Gênica/genética , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Pharmacotherapy ; 21(8): 904-19, 2001 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11718497

RESUMO

Oxcarbazepine is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that has been registered in more than 50 countries worldwide since 1990 and recently received approval in the United States and the European Union. Oxcarbazepine is a keto analog of carbamazepine and has a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile. It is rapidly absorbed after oral administration and undergoes rapid and almost complete reductive metabolism to form the pharmacologically active 10-monohydroxy derivative. Oxcarbazepine exhibits linear pharmacokinetics, no autoinduction, and minimal interaction with other AEDs. Ten controlled trials demonstrated that oxcarbazepine is safe and efficacious in the treatment of partial seizures across a wide range of ages (children to adults), situations (recent onset to treatment-resistant epilepsy), and uses (monotherapy and adjunctive therapy). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events are related to the central nervous system. Treatment-emergent hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium level < 125 mEq/L) occurred in 3% of patients treated with oxcarbazepine in clinical trials. According to the efficacy and safety profile established in the controlled trials, oxcarbazepine represents an important new treatment option indicated for monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in adults with partial seizures and as adjunctive therapy in children aged 4 years or older with partial seizures. Although structurally similar to carbamazepine, significant differences exist in the pharmacokinetics, drug interaction potential, adverse-effect profile, and dosage and titration between these two agents, and they should be considered distinct therapeutic agents.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Carbamazepina/análogos & derivados , Carbamazepina/uso terapêutico , Epilepsias Parciais/tratamento farmacológico , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacologia , Carbamazepina/efeitos adversos , Carbamazepina/farmacologia , Interações Medicamentosas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Oxcarbazepina , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
12.
Epilepsia ; 42(12): 1574-9, 2001 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11879369

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetics of the novel antiepileptic drug (AED) levetiracetam and its major metabolite, ucb L057, were studied in children with partial seizures in a multicenter, open-label, single-dose study. METHODS: Twenty-four children (15 boys, nine girls), 6 to 12 years old, received a single dose of levetiracetam (20 mg/kg) as an adjunct to their stable regimen of a single concomitant AED, followed by a 24-h pharmacokinetic evaluation. RESULTS: In children, the half-lives of levetiracetam and its metabolite ucb L057 were 6.0 +/- 1.1 and 8.1 +/-2.7 hours, respectively. The Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) of levetiracetam equated for a 1-mg/kg dose were lower in children (Cmax, norm=1.33 plus minus 0.35 microg/ml; AUCnorm=12.4 +/- 3.5 microg/h/ml) than in adults (Cmax, norm=1.38 +/- 0.05 microg/ml; AUCnorm=11.48 +/- 0.63 microg/h/ml), whereas the renal clearance was higher. The apparent body clearance (1.43 +/- 0.36 ml/min/kg) was approximately 30-40% higher in children than in adults. Levetiracetam was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these data, a daily maintenance dose equivalent to 130-140% of the usual daily adult maintenance dosage (1,000-3,000 mg/day) in two divided doses, on a weight-normalized level (mg/kg/day) is initially recommended. Clinical efficacy trials in children are ongoing with dosages of 20 to 60 mg/kg/day.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Piracetam/análogos & derivados , Piracetam/farmacocinética , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Criança , Creatina/metabolismo , Epilepsia/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Levetiracetam , Masculino , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piracetam/uso terapêutico
13.
Epilepsia ; 41 Suppl 8: S6-15, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11092608

RESUMO

This article reexamines the role of blood-level monitoring (therapeutic drug monitoring, TDM) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the current treatment of epilepsy and identifies situations in which TDM can be useful. Basic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles are reviewed, with specific emphasis on kinetics of absorption/distribution/metabolism, elimination half-life, time to steady state, and plasma drug concentrations. The relationship between AED intensity of effect (pharmacodynamics) and plasma concentration (pharmacokinetics) is expressed mathematically, examined in the context of the major old and new AEDs, and integrated with a historical look at the role of TDM. Situations in which TDM can be useful in the modern treatment of epilepsy are presented and discussed. For both older and newer AEDs, TDM is useful in six clinical situations: establishing "baseline" effective concentrations, evaluating potential causes for lack of efficacy, evaluating potential causes for toxicity, evaluating potential causes for loss of efficacy, judging "room to move" or when to change AEDs, and minimizing predictable problems. TDM remains a valuable tool in the modern treatment of epilepsy. It can be selectively and appropriately utilized to help maximize seizure control and minimize side effects if levels are obtained in response to a patient-specific pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic issue or problem.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/sangue , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/normas , Epilepsia/sangue , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Epilepsia/metabolismo , Humanos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Qualidade de Vida
14.
Epilepsia ; 41 Suppl 8: S16-29, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11092609

RESUMO

This article describes the mechanisms of idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) and provides an analysis of potential methods for identifying patients at high risk for antiepileptic idiosyncratic drug reactions. IDRs may be caused by toxic metabolites, either directly or indirectly (by way of an immunologic response or a free radical-mediated process). Four methods to potentially identify patients at high risk for AED IDRs are discussed: development of an "at-risk" clinical profile for a particular AED: identification of biomarkers that measure the formation of a toxic metabolite by a previously unrecognized bioactivation pathway for a particular AED; identification of biomarkers indicating deficient detoxification abilities [e.g., deficient free radical scavenging enzyme activities or low calculated oxidative protection (COP) ratios 1 and 2]; and identification of at-risk genetic markers. Clinical profiles for patients receiving valproic acid (VPA), felbamate (FBM), and lamotrigine (LTG) and who are at risk for development of AED IDRs are presented. Patients with VPA IDRs have deficient erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity, low plasma selenium concentrations, low COP1 ratios, and low COP2 ratios compared with age-matched controls. Patients with FBM-associated aplastic anemia have deficient erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione reductase activities compared with age-matched controls. Use of at-risk clinical profiles (for VPA, FBM, and LTG) and measurement of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity, erythrocyte SOD activity, and calculation of COP1 and COP2 ratios (for VPA and FBM) are inexpensive, simple methods of identifying high-risk patients for IDRs. Research is needed to further characterize the mechanism of IDRs, to investigate the clinical utility of free radical-scavenging enzyme activity measurement and calculation of COP ratios for other AED IDRs, and to develop additional methods of identifying patients at high risk for AED IDRs.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Epilepsia/enzimologia , Epilepsia/metabolismo , Epóxido Hidrolases/metabolismo , Felbamato , Sequestradores de Radicais Livres/análise , Sequestradores de Radicais Livres/sangue , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Lamotrigina , Fenilcarbamatos , Propilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Triazinas/efeitos adversos , Ácido Valproico/efeitos adversos
15.
Neurology ; 54(12): 2237-44, 2000 Jun 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10881246

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxcarbazepine (OXC) as adjunctive therapy in children with inadequately controlled partial seizures on one or two concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). BACKGROUND: OXC has shown antiepileptic activity in several comparative monotherapy trials in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy, and in a placebo-controlled monotherapy trial in hospitalized patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery. DESIGN: A total of 267 patients were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisting of three phases: 1) a 56-day baseline phase (patients maintained on their current AEDs); 2) a 112-day double-blind treatment phase (patients received either OXC 30-46 mg/kg/day orally or placebo); and 3) an open-label extension phase. Data are reported only from the double-blind treatment phase; the open-label extension phase is ongoing. METHODS: Children (3 to 17 years old) with inadequately controlled partial seizures (simple, complex, and partial seizures evolving to secondarily generalized seizures) were enrolled. RESULTS: Patients treated with OXC experienced a significantly greater median percent reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency than patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0001; 35% versus 9%, respectively). Forty-one percent of patients treated with OXC experienced a > or =50% reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency per 28 days compared with 22% of patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0005). Ninety-one percent of the group treated with OXC and 82% of the group treated with placebo reported > or =1 adverse event; vomiting, somnolence, dizziness, and nausea occurred more frequently (twofold or greater) in the group treated with OXC. CONCLUSION: OXC adjunctive therapy administered in a dose range of 6 to 51 mg/kg/day (median 31.4 mg/kg/day) is safe, effective, and well tolerated in children with partial seizures.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Carbamazepina/análogos & derivados , Carbamazepina/uso terapêutico , Epilepsias Parciais/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Carbamazepina/efeitos adversos , Carbamazepina/sangue , Carbamazepina/farmacocinética , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Eletroencefalografia , Epilepsias Parciais/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Oxcarbazepina , Análise de Regressão , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Ther Drug Monit ; 22(2): 195-201, 2000 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10774633

RESUMO

An improved micromethod involving capillary gas chromatographic assay with liquid-liquid extraction and nitrogen phosphorus detection (GC/NPD) was developed and validated for the determination of topiramate (TPM) in human body fluids. The galactopyranose analog of TPM was used as the internal standard. Capillary gas chromatographic conditions yielded typical retention times of 6.8 min for TPM and 7.2 min for the internal standard. Calibrations were linear between 1.0 and 32 microg/mL. Between-day precision (n = 17) for three serum controls (3.0, 10, and 24.5 microg/mL) resulted in coefficients of variation of 6.9%, 7.3%, and 4.9%, respectively. The limit of detection was 0.42 microg/mL. There was an excellent linear correlation between the fluorescence-polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and GC/NPD determinations of 56 patient specimens (r2 = 0.981). Chromatograms showed no interfering peaks with the respective blank human samples or from many commonly prescribed drugs. Because of improved specificity and decreased sample volume requirements, this micromethod should be particularly useful for monitoring TPM therapy in pediatric patients, for patients with impaired renal function, and for research studies.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/análise , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Frutose/análogos & derivados , Criança , Cromatografia Gasosa , Polarização de Fluorescência , Frutose/análise , Humanos , Imunoensaio , Topiramato
17.
Epilepsia ; 41(S1): 91-4, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10768309

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The long-term effectiveness of topiramate (TPM) was evaluated in children with West syndrome previously refractory to antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. METHODS: Children with infantile spasms who completed a pilot study were eligible to enter a long-term extension phase in which the dosages of TPM and other AEDs could be adjusted to optimal response (maximum, 50 mg/kg/day TPM). The mean duration of long-term therapy was 18 months in the 11 children who were followed; the mean TPM dosage was 29 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: Eight (73%) children were continuing TPM therapy at the time data were analyzed; four (50%) children were spasm free, seven (88%) had experienced a > or =50% reduction in spasms, and three (38%) were able to achieve TPM monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: TPM was well tolerated in that no patients discontinued because of adverse events. The response achieved with TPM during the pilot study was maintained in most children.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Frutose/análogos & derivados , Espasmos Infantis/tratamento farmacológico , Idade de Início , Pré-Escolar , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Eletroencefalografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Frutose/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Espasmos Infantis/diagnóstico , Topiramato , Resultado do Tratamento , Gravação em Vídeo , Aumento de Peso
18.
Epilepsia ; 41(S1): 82-5, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10768307

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Children with partial-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization, participating in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of topiramate (TPM) as adjunctive therapy were eligible to participate in an open-label, long-term extension study. METHODS: A total of 83 children (mean age, 9 years) continued long-term open-label TPM therapy in which the dosages of TPM and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were adjusted according to clinical response (mean TPM dosage, 9 mg/kg/day). RESULTS: Seizure frequency over the last 3 months of therapy was reduced > or =50% in 57% of children; 14% of children were seizure-free > or =6 months at the last visit. During treatment periods up to 2 1/2 years (mean, 15 months), 6% of children discontinued because of treatment-emergent adverse events; 13% discontinued because of inadequate seizure control. CONCLUSIONS: From these findings, TPM is well tolerated and provides long-term seizure control in children with partial-onset seizures.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Epilepsias Parciais/tratamento farmacológico , Frutose/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Epilepsias Parciais/diagnóstico , Frutose/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Placebos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Topiramato , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Epilepsia ; 41(S1): 86-90, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10768308

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The response to topiramate (TPM) as long-term adjunctive therapy was evaluated in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) in a long-term, open-label extension to a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: In 97 patients with LGS (mean age, 11 years), dosages of TPM and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were adjusted to optimal clinical response (mean TPM dosage, 10 mg/kg/day). RESULTS: For those patients who had completed 6 months of TPM therapy, drop attacks were reduced > or =50% in 55% of patients; 15% of patients had no drop attacks for > or =6 months at the last visit. After treatment up to 3+ years, 71% of patients who started open-label TPM were continuing therapy at the last visit. CONCLUSIONS: During long-term therapy, TPM is effective and well tolerated in controlling the treatment-resistant drop attacks and seizures associated with LGS.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Frutose/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Frutose/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Placebos , Topiramato , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Neurology ; 54(5): 1185-8, 2000 Mar 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10720296

RESUMO

Angelman's syndrome, a genetic disorder involving a defect in the DNA coding for subunits of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptor, often is associated with intractable epilepsy. Topiramate is a novel anticonvulsant that enhances GABAergic neurotransmission. Five children with Angelman's syndrome and epilepsy were treated with topiramate for clinical indications. The drug was effective and well tolerated, possibly because of its GABAergic properties. Further studies are necessary to confirm and elucidate this observation.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Angelman/complicações , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia/etiologia , Frutose/análogos & derivados , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Frutose/efeitos adversos , Frutose/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Topiramato
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...