Return to Sport Rates in Physically Active Individuals 6 Months After Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

CONTEXT: Six months is the expected time frame to return to sport (RTS) after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). OBJECTIVE: The primary aims of this study were to (1) report the RTS rate of physically active individuals 6 months after arthroscopic surgery for FAIS and (2) compare the self-reported hip function between those who were able to RTS against those who had not. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. PATIENTS: A total of 42 physically active individuals scheduled for hip arthroscopy for FAIS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported function, including preinjury and current activity levels and ability to participate in sport, were collected on 42 individuals with FAIS prior to surgery and at 6-month follow-up. Participants were allocated into 2 groups based on self-reported RTS status at 6-month follow-up. Separate 2-way analyses of variance were used to test the interaction of groups (those who did/did not RTS). Main effects were reported in the absence of statistically significant interactions (P ≤ .05). RESULTS: Altogether, 28 of 42 participants (66%) returned for 6-month follow-up; 5 of the 14 participants (35.7%) lost to follow-up underwent contralateral hip surgery within the study time frame. At the 6-month follow-up, 16 of the remaining 28 participants (57.1%) reported that they had returned to sport, 5 of whom returned at their prior level of participation. There was no statistically significant interaction of group and time for either hip outcome score subscale (P ≥ .20). Self-reported hip function improved over time, regardless of group (P ≤ .001). Participants in the yRTS group demonstrated higher hip outcome score-sport scores than did the nRTS group, regardless of time (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Though just over half of participants returned to sport 6 months after hip arthroscopy for FAIS, only 18% returned to their previous level of sports participation. Participants who returned to sport reported better function than those who did not, but self-reported hip function improved over time regardless of group. The most commonly reported reasons for not returning to sport were weakness (69.6%), fear (65.2%), and pain (56.5%).

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the selective functional movement assessment (sfma).

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The Selective Functional Movement Assessment (SFMA) is a clinical assessment system designed to identify musculoskeletal dysfunction by evaluation of fundamental movements for limitations or symptom provocation. The purpose of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the ten fundamental movement patterns of the SFMA in a healthy population using the SFMA categorical and criterion checklist scoring tools. METHODS: 35 healthy subjects (22.9 years +/- 1.9) were recorded with two digital video cameras (1-frontal view/1-sagittal view) while they performed the ten fundamental movements patterns that comprise the SFMA. Evaluators with varying experience with the SFMA (rater A, > 100 hours; rater B, 25 hours; and rater C, 16 hours) and not present at the initial data collection evaluated each video using categorical and criterion checklist scoring tools. Evaluators repeated this process at least one week later. The evaluators' composite results were compared between and within raters using the kappa coefficient and ICC's for categorical scoring and criterion checklist scoring, respectively. RESULTS: Substantial to almost perfect intra-rater reliability of the SFMA (kappa, % agreement) was observed for all raters using the categorical scoring tool (rater A: .83, .91; rater B: .78, .88; and rater C: .72, .85). The criterion checklist scoring tool yielded intra-rater ICCs (3,1; 95% confidence interval) ranging from good to poor with rater A demonstrating the highest reliability (ICC [SEM]) (.52 [2.36]) and rater C the lowest reliability (.26 [3.42]). Inter-rater reliability of the categorical scoring tool was slight to substantial (.41-.61, .69-.79) while the criterion checklist tool (ICC 2,1) demonstrated unacceptable inter-rater reliability when assessed in all raters together (.43 [2.7]). CONCLUSIONS: As hypothesized, intra-and inter-rater reliability of categorical scoring and criterion checklist scoring of the ten fundamental movements of the SFMA was higher in raters with greater experience.