RESUMO
BACKGROUND: End Stage Ankle Arthritis (ESAA) causes pain and dysfunction. It is treated effectively with Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) or Ankle Arthrodesis (AA). Currently there is no consensus on which surgical procedure is superior. This paper will provide a systematic review of all published high-quality studies directly comparing TAA and AA for the surgical treatment of ESAA to determine superiority. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of the highest quality studies published that directly compare clinical outcomes of TAA and AA for surgical treatment of ESAA was conducted. Each study was assigned a Level of Evidence (LOE) rating (I-III) and then summarized to assign a grade of recommendation (A-C, I). Superiority was determined for the clinical outcomes of pain, activity, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL), readmission to hospital, revision surgery and general complications. RESULTS: There is fair evidence (GOR B) that supports both TAA and AA for the surgical treatment of ESAA. However, TAA trended to be superior for pain relief (GOR B), activity (GOR B), health related quality of life (GOR B) and readmission rate (GOR B) while AA trended to be superior for revision rates (GOR B). Conflicting evidence was presented for general complications (GOR C) CONCLUSION: Due to the lack of level I papers and the findings from the papers reviewed not being consistent, no definitive conclusion on which procedure is better can be made. However, there is enough evidence to provide a basis for which procedure is more effective in each of the outcomes reviewed. This should be considered when deciding on which procedure is best suited for a patient on a case-by-case basis. To allow for a stronger recommendation, further studies-ideally, high-quality level I randomized control trials directly comparing Ankle Arthrodesis and Total Ankle Arthroplasty are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review.
