Accurate preoperative prediction of unplanned 30-day postoperative readmission using 8 predictor variables.

BACKGROUND: Unplanned postoperative readmissions are associated with high costs, may indicate poor care quality, and present a substantial opportunity for healthcare quality improvement. Patients want to know their risk of unplanned readmission, and surgeons need to know the risk to adequately counsel their patients. The Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System tool was developed from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset and is a parsimonious model using 8 predictor variables. Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System is applicable to >3,000 operations in 9 surgical specialties, predicts 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity, and is incorporated into our electronic health record. METHODS: A Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System model was developed using logistic regression. It was compared to the 28 nonlaboratory variables model from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012 to 2017 dataset using the c-index as a measure of discrimination, the Hosmer-Lemeshow observed-to-expected plots testing calibration, and the Brier score, a combined metric of discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: Of 4,861,370 patients, 188,150 (3.98%) experienced unplanned readmission related to the index operation. The Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System model's c-index, 0.728, was 99.3% of that of the full model's, 0.733; the Hosmer-Lemeshow plots indicated good calibration; and the Brier score was 0.0372 for Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System and 0.0371 for the full model. CONCLUSION: The 8 variable Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System model detects patients at risk for postoperative unplanned, related readmission as accurately as the full model developed from all 28 nonlaboratory preoperative variables in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset. Therefore, unplanned readmission can be integrated into the existing Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System tool providing moderately accurate prediction of postoperative readmission.

Claims Variability in Charges and Payments for Common Open and Endovascular Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness in healthcare is being increasingly scrutinized. Data regarding claims variability for vascular operations are lacking. Herein, we aim to describe variability in charges and payments for aortoiliac (AI) and infrainguinal (II) revascularizations. METHODS: We analyzed 2012-2014 claims data from a statewide claims database for procedures grouped by Current Procedural Terminology codes into II-open (II-O), II-endovascular (II-E), AI-open (AI-O), and AI-endovascular interventions (AI-E). We compared charges and payments in urban (≥50,000 people, UAs) versus rural areas (<50,000 people, RAs). Amounts are reported in $US as median with interquartile range. Cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs) as a measure of reimbursement were calculated as the percentage of the charges covered by the payments. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed to determine significant differences. RESULTS: A total of 5,239 persons had complete claims data. There were 7,239 UA and 6,891 RA claims, and 1,057 AI claims (AI-E = 879, AI-O = 178) and 4,182 II claims (II-E = 3,012, II-0 = 1,170). Median charges were $5,357 for AI [$1,846-$27,107] and $2,955 for II [$1,484-$9,338.5] (P < 0.0001). Median plan payment was $454 for AI [$0-$1,380] and $454 for II [$54-$1,060] (P = 0.67). For AI and II, charges were significantly higher for UA than RA (AI: UA $9,875 [$2,489-$34,427], RA $3,732 [$1,450-$20,595], P < 0.0001; II: UA $3,596 [$1,700-$21,664], RA $2,534 [$1,298-$6,169], P < 0.0001). AI-E charges were higher than AI-O (AI-E $7,960 [$1,699-$32,507], AI-O $4,774 [$2,636-$7,147], P < 0.0001), but AI-O payments were higher (AI-E $424 [$0-$1,270], AI-O $869 [$164-$1,435], P = 0.0067). II-E charges were higher (II-E $2,994 [$1,552-$22,164], II-O $2,873 [$1,108-$5,345], P < 0.0001), but II-O payments were higher (II-E $427 [$50-$907], II-O $596 [$73-$1,299], P < 0.0001). CCRs were highest for II operations and UAs. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variability in claim charges and payments exists for vascular operations. AI procedures had higher charges than II, without any difference in payments. UA charged more than RA for both AI and II operations, but RA had higher payments and CCRs. Endovascular procedures had higher charges, while open procedures had higher payments. Charge differences may be related to endovascular device costs, and further research is necessary to determine the reasons behind consistent claims variability between UA and RA.

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Resulting in Perforation and Massive Retroperitoneal Hematoma Presenting as Acute Onset of Lower Extremity Weakness.

Perforation of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter struts is a common incidental finding on postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans that is not associated with bleeding or major complications. However, in rare circumstances, it can be associated with hemorrhage requiring immediate removal. We present a case of a 62-year-old man who developed abdominal pain and right lower extremity weakness 2 weeks after treatment of a pulmonary embolism with IVC filter placement and anticoagulation. A CT scan revealed a large right-sided retroperitoneal hematoma with active extravasation from the IVC filter struts that had perforated the IVC wall. He underwent a hybrid operation with endovascular retrieval of the IVC filter and concomitant IVC primary repair combined with evacuation of the hematoma, causing nerve compression. Postoperatively, he regained normal sensory and motor function. Perforation of IVC filter struts is usually asymptomatic, but in rare circumstances, it can cause hemorrhage requiring immediate removal and IVC repair. Surgical intervention is indicated in the setting of a large hematoma with nerve or vessel compression and may require a combined endovascular and open approach.

Treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic disease in patients with connective tissue disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Aneurysmal degeneration of the entire aorta is common in patients with connective tissue disorders (CTDs). Potential treatment options of these aneurysms include open repair and endovascular repair. Our objective herein was to review available evidence for different approaches to treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic disease in patients with CTDs. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review using PubMed and referenced manuscripts on open and endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms and dissections in patients with CTDs. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies were identified for inclusion in this review, 8 reporting on outcomes after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with CTD, 8 on open branched graft use, and 12 on endovascular aortic repair in this population of patients. Reported outcomes were characterized by low perioperative morbidity and mortality, good branch patency, and low rate of reintervention for open repair and significant rates of endograft-related complications and substantial need for secondary endovascular interventions and open conversions for endovascular repair. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support any particular approach to aortic repair in patients with CTD and a dearth of comparative data between open repair and endovascular repair. There are distinct differences in the published lengths of follow-up between the two repair approaches as well as in the prevalence of their use in an acute vs elective setting. It is evident that endovascular interventions for aortic disease in patients with CTDs are associated with many device- and aorta-related complications both in the short term and in the long term. Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, open repair currently remains the standard approach to treatment of aortic disease due to CTDs. Open branched graft repair in particular is the preferred technique. Endovascular interventions may be cautiously used in patients with CTDs in selective circumstances.

Postoperative Complications Drive Unplanned Readmissions After Esophagectomy for Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions are increasingly viewed as a marker of inferior health care quality and penalized with decreased reimbursement. The timing of, and reasons for, readmissions after esophagectomy for cancer are not well understood. We examined the association of complications to 30-day postoperative-related, unplanned readmission to identify opportunities for improvement in patient care. METHODS: We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2012 to 2015) to characterize 30-day postoperative unplanned readmissions after esophagectomy for cancer using descriptive statistics. Type and timing of readmission after discharge was assessed. A Cox proportional hazards model was developed to identify predictors of readmission. RESULTS: Of 3,723 patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer, 1,419 (38.1%) experienced ≥1 complication within 30 days. A total of 400 patients (10.7%) experienced related, unplanned readmissions within 30 days of the operation, and postoperative complications were documented in 263 (65.8%). Leading causes of readmission were infectious, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal complications. Of these patients, 155 (59%) were readmitted within 7 days and 236 (90%) within 14 days of discharge. The Cox proportional hazards model identified readmission being associated with occurrence of postdischarge infectious, pulmonary, venous thromboembolic, and urinary tract infection complications, in-hospital urinary tract infection complications, and log-transformation of length of stay (representing increasing length of stay) (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative occurrence of common complications and prolonged length of stay are associated with unplanned readmission after esophagectomy. Most patients are readmitted within 1 week of discharge. Earlier follow-up after discharge may identify patients with complications and facilitate outpatient intervention to prevent readmission.

Temporal Trends, Determinants, and Outcomes of Inpatient versus Outpatient Arteriovenous Fistula Operations.

BACKGROUND: As high healthcare costs are increasing scrutinized, a movement toward reducing patient hospital admissions and lengths of stay has emerged, particularly for operations that may be performed safely in the outpatient setting. Our aim is to describe recent temporal trends in the proportion of dialysis access procedures performed on an inpatient versus outpatient basis and to determine the effects of these changes on perioperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The 2005-2008 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all primary arteriovenous fistula (AVF) procedures using current procedural terminology codes. Changes in the proportions of inpatient versus outpatient operations performed by year, as well as the associated 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, were analyzed using univariable statistics and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Two thousand nine hundred fifty AVF procedures were performed over the study period. Overall, 71.7% (n = 2,114) were performed on an outpatient basis. Inpatient procedures were associated with higher 30-day morbidity (10.5% vs. 4.5%) and mortality (2.8% vs. 0.7%) than outpatient procedures (both, P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in the proportion of procedures performed on an outpatient basis over time (2005: 56% vs. 2008: 75%; P < 0.001). There were no changes in postoperative morbidity or mortality for inpatient or outpatient AVF over time (P ≥ 0.36). Independent determinants of having an inpatient procedure included younger age (OR 0.99), increasing ASA class (ASA IV OR 1.56), congestive heart failure (OR 3.32), recent ascites (OR 3.25), poor functional status (OR 3.22), the presence of an open wound (OR 1.91), and recent sepsis (OR 6.06) (all, P < 0.01). Acute renal failure (OR 2.60) and current dialysis (OR 1.44) were also predictive (P < 0.001). After correcting for baseline differences between groups, the adjusted OR for both morbidity (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.38-2.69) and mortality (aOR 2.85, 95% CI 1.36-5.95) remained significantly higher for inpatient versus outpatient AVF. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis access operations are increasingly being performed on an outpatient basis, with stable perioperative outcomes. Inpatient procedures are associated with worse outcomes, likely because they are reserved for patients with acute illnesses, serious comorbidities, and poor functional status. Overall, for appropriately selected patients, the movement toward performing more elective dialysis access operations on an outpatient basis is associated with acceptable outcomes.

Suprageniculate Approach to Release of Popliteal Entrapment without Distal Bypass Despite Preoperative Runoff Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome is an uncommon condition in which anatomic or functional popliteal artery compression causes arterial insufficiency. We present a case of popliteal entrapment with runoff thrombosis treated with suprageniculate release of entrapment without distal bypass. RESULTS: A 15-year old boy with Klinefelter syndrome presented with right leg claudication severely limiting his activity. He had a palpable femoral pulse, but no palpable popliteal or foot pulses on the right. Noninvasive testing showed a partially thrombosed popliteal artery with an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 0.69. Computed tomography scan revealed type III popliteal entrapment with distal thromboses and abnormal insertion of gastrocnemius muscle. Popliteal entrapment release was performed via a medial suprageniculate approach in consideration for distal bypass. The soleus was released first; intraoperative angiography showed continued popliteal compression with forced dorsiflexion. This was followed by release of the gastrocnemius and found caudal and medial to the soleus as a tight band. Repeat angiography showed cessation of popliteal artery compression with dorsiflexion. Bypass was not performed due to improvement of distal flow seen on angiography. Postoperative recovery was unremarkable. On 1-month and 9-month follow-up, he had a normal ABI and arterial duplex, was asymptomatic, and had returned to normal activities. CONCLUSIONS: We describe suprageniculate approach to popliteal release that may be useful if a distal bypass is planned. In this case, bypass was unnecessary despite the abnormal appearance of distal runoff on preoperative imaging, as the child's perfusion improved with entrapment release alone, and arterial remodeling over time resulted in normal perfusion and arterial appearance on duplex imaging.

Current management of infected aortic grafts in patients with connective tissue disorders.

Patients with connective tissue disorder present a particular clinical challenge in the treatment of aortic graft infections. Specific complexities arise in patients with connective tissue disorders when reoperation for aortic graft infection is required. Herein we describe current management of infected aortic grafts in patients with connective tissue disorders using homograft and rifampin-coated graft replacements using in situ replacement therapy, which is associated with improved outcome compared to graft excision and extra-anatomic bypass.

National Analysis of Unplanned Readmissions After Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lung Cancer Resection.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions are viewed as a mark of inferior health care quality and are penalized. Unplanned postoperative readmission reason and timing after lung resection are not well understood. We examine related, unplanned readmissions after thoracoscopic versus open anatomic lung resections to identify opportunities to improve patient care. METHODS: We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) data set, 2012 to 2015, characterizing 30-day related, unplanned postoperative readmissions after anatomic lung resections for primary lung cancer. Risk-adjusted comparison of readmission after thoracoscopic and open resection was performed using propensity matching. RESULTS: Patients (n = 9,510) underwent anatomic lung resections; 4,935 (51.9%) were thoracoscopic resections and 4,575 (48.1%) were open resections. Of the thoracoscopic patients, 10.9% experienced one or more complications, versus 19.4% of patients with open resection (p < 0.0001). Of the thoracoscopic patients 5.5% experienced related, unplanned readmissions versus 7.2% of the patients with open resection (p < 0.001). 24.8% of complications after thoracoscopic approach occurred after discharge, versus 15.5% after open approach (p < 0.0001). Timing of unplanned readmission was similar for both groups. The propensity-matched odds ratio of risk of readmission after thoracoscopic versus open resection was 1.16 (95% confidence interval, 0.949 to 1.411, p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Open anatomic lung resections for primary lung cancer had nearly twice the complication rate but only a slightly higher readmission rate than thoracoscopic resection. More complications occurred after discharge after thoracoscopic than open resections. Most readmissions occurred within 2 weeks after both thoracoscopic and open resections. Risk-adjusted comparison identified no statistically significant difference in risk of related, unplanned readmission after thoracoscopic versus open resections. Future studies should focus on identification of processes of care to decrease complications and unplanned readmissions after lung cancer resection.

Partnerships Between Podiatrists and Vascular Surgeons in Building Effective Wound Care Centers.

This practice memo, a collaborative effort between the Young Physicians' Program of the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) and the Young Surgeons Committee of the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS), is intended to aid podiatrists and vascular surgeons in the early years of their respective careers, especially those involved in the care of patients with chronic wounds. During these formative years, learning how to successfully establish an inter-professional partnership is crucial in order to provide the best possible care to this important patient population.

Partnerships between podiatrists and vascular surgeons in building effective wound care centers.

This practice memo, a collaborative effort between the Young Physicians' Program of the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Young Surgeons Committee of the Society for Vascular Surgery, is intended to aid podiatrists and vascular surgeons in the early years of their respective careers, especially those involved in the care of patients with chronic wounds. During these formative years, learning how to successfully establish an interprofessional partnership is crucial to provide the best possible care to this important population of patients.

A 10-year institutional experience with open branched graft reconstruction of aortic aneurysms in connective tissue disorders versus degenerative disease.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic reconstruction for complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) can be challenging, especially in patients with connective tissue disorders (CTDs) in whom tissue fragility is a major concern. Branched graft reconstruction is a more complex operation compared with inclusion patch repair of the aorta but is frequently necessary in patients with CTDs or other pathologies because of anatomic reasons. We describe our institutional experience with open branched graft reconstruction of aortic aneurysms and compare outcomes for patients with CTDs vs degenerative pathologies. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients undergoing open aortic reconstruction using branched grafts at our institution between July 2006 and December 2015. Postoperative outcomes, including perioperative morbidity and mortality, midterm graft patency, and the development of new aneurysms, were compared for patients with CTD vs degenerative disease. RESULTS: During the 10-year study period, 137 patients (CTD, 29; degenerative, 108) underwent aortic repair with branched graft reconstruction. CTD patients were significantly younger (39 ± 1.9 vs 68 ± 1.0 years; P < .001) and had fewer comorbidities (hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease; P < .05) but a higher prevalence of aortic dissections (55% vs 16%; P < .001) and aneurysms involving the thoracic aorta (90% vs 60%; P = .003) than patients with degenerative disease. Perioperative mortality (CTD: 10% [n = 3] vs degenerative: 6% [n = 6]; P = .40) and any complication (62% vs 55%; P = .47) were similar between groups. At a median follow-up time of 14.5 months (interquartile range: 6.5, 43.9 months), CTD patients were more likely to develop both new aortic (21%) and nonaortic (14%) aneurysms compared with the degenerative group (7% and 4% for aortic and nonaortic aneurysms, respectively; P = .02). Loss of branch graft patency occurred in 0 of 99 grafts (0%) in CTD patients and in 13 of 167 grafts (7.8%) in degenerative disease patients (P = .005). Loss of branch graft patency occurred most commonly in left renal artery bypass grafts (77%) and was clinically asymptomatic (creatinine: 1.77 ± 0.13 mg/dL currently vs 1.41 ± 0.25 preoperatively; P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: CTD patients with aortic aneurysms who undergo open branched graft reconstruction have reasonable outcomes compared with patients with degenerative pathology, including better branched graft patency and a similar risk of perioperative mortality and complications. Open repair of aortic aneurysms with branched graft reconstruction can be performed safely in both populations with low perioperative mortality, but ongoing surveillance is critical for the detection of new aneurysms, especially among patients with CTD.

Choosing Surgery for Neurogenic TOS: The Roles of Physical Exam, Physical Therapy, and Imaging.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is characterized by arm and hand pain, paresthesias, and sometimes weakness resulting from compression of the brachial plexus within the thoracic outlet. While it is the most common subtype of TOS, nTOS can be difficult to diagnose. Furthermore, patient selection for surgical treatment can be challenging as symptoms may be vague and ambiguous, and diagnostic studies may be equivocal. Herein, we describe some approaches to aid in identifying patients who would be expected to benefit from surgical intervention for nTOS. We describe the role of physical examination, physical therapy, and imaging in the evaluation and diagnosis of nTOS.

Medical therapy and intervention do not improve uncomplicated isolated mesenteric artery dissection outcomes over observation alone.

OBJECTIVE: Isolated dissection of the mesenteric vessels is rare but increasingly recognized. This study aimed to evaluate patient characteristics, primary treatment, and subsequent outcomes of mesenteric dissection using multi-institutional data. METHODS: All patients at participant hospitals between January 2003 and December 2015 with dissection of the celiac artery (or its branches) or dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were included. Patients with an aortic dissection were excluded. Demographic, treatment, and follow-up data were collected. The primary outcomes included late vessel thrombosis (LVT) and aneurysmal degeneration (AD). RESULTS: Twelve institutions identified 227 patients (220 with complete treatment records) with a mean age of 55 ± 12.5 years. Median time to last follow up was 15 months (interquartile range, 3.8-32). Most patients were men (82% vs 18% women) and symptomatic at presentation (162 vs 65 asymptomatic). Isolated SMA dissection was more common than celiac artery dissection (n = 158 and 81, respectively). Concomitant dissection of both arteries was rare (n = 12). The mean dissection length was significantly longer in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic patients in both the celiac artery (27 vs 18 mm; P = .01) and the SMA (64 vs 40 mm; P < .001). Primary treatment was medical in 146 patients with oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy (n = 76 and 70, respectively), whereas 56 patients were observed. LVT occurred in six patients, and 16 patients developed AD (3% and 8%, respectively). For symptomatic patients without evidence of ischemia (n = 134), there was no difference in occurrence of LVT with medical therapy compared with observation alone (9% vs 0%; P = .35). No asymptomatic patient (n = 64) had an episode of LVT at 5 years. AD rates did not differ among symptomatic patients without ischemia treated with medical therapy or observed (9% vs 5%; P = .95). Surgical or endovascular intervention was performed in 18 patients (3 ischemia, 13 pain, 1 AD, 1 asymptomatic). Excluding the patients treated for ischemia, there was no difference in LVT with surgical intervention vs medical management (one vs five; P = .57). CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic patients with isolated mesenteric artery dissection may be observed and followed up with intermittent imaging. Symptomatic patients tend to have longer dissections than asymptomatic patients. Symptomatic isolated mesenteric artery dissection without evidence of ischemia does not require anticoagulation and may be treated with antiplatelet therapy or observation alone.

Morbidity of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is directly related to diameter.

OBJECTIVE: Previous randomized controlled trials have defined specific size thresholds to guide surgical decision-making in patients presenting with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). With recent advances in endovascular techniques, the anatomic considerations of AAA repair are rapidly changing. Our specific aims were to evaluate the most recent national population data to compare anatomic differences and perioperative outcomes in patients with AAA. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried from 2011 to 2015 using the targeted vascular public use file. Patients with AAA undergoing elective open or endovascular repair were included. Risk factors and outcomes were stratified by size and divided into quartiles for categorical comparison. A logistic regression model was used to compare the impact of size on morbidity and mortality with each technique. A risk adjustment model used all preoperative criteria to generate observed and expected values for open and endovascular repair. RESULTS: There were 10,026 patients who underwent elective AAA repair, 8182 (81.6%) endovascular and 1844 (18.4%) open. Repairs were divided into density quartiles for a logistic analysis: smallest quartile, 3.5 to 5 cm; second quartile, 5.01 to 5.5 cm; third quartile, 5.51 to 6.2 cm; and largest quartile, >6.2 cm. Patients with larger aneurysms (>6.2 cm) were more likely to be male, to have a dependent functional status, and to have increased blood urea nitrogen concentration and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P < .05). Larger aneurysms had longer operative time (162 vs 135 minutes) and greater extension toward the renal and iliac vessels (all P < .05). Risk adjustment revealed an observed/expected morbidity plot that favored endovascular repair throughout the size range but confirmed lack of size effect within the open repair category. The adjusted increase in morbidity with endovascular repair is 9.7% per centimeter increase in size of AAA. These trends remained true with an infrarenal subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a larger AAA have comorbidities and anatomic factors associated with a more difficult repair. The higher morbidity seen with larger aneurysms represents both anatomic and patient factors but seems to have a greater impact on endovascular repairs. However, endovascular repair still results in fewer near-term complications than open repair across all size strata.

Operative variables are better predictors of postdischarge infections and unplanned readmissions in vascular surgery patients than patient characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: Although postoperative readmissions are frequent in vascular surgery patients, the reasons for these readmissions are not well characterized, and effective approaches to their reduction are unknown. Our aim was to analyze the reasons for vascular surgery readmissions and to report potential areas for focused efforts aimed at readmission reduction. METHODS: The 2012 to 2013 American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) data set was queried for vascular surgery patients. Multivariable models were developed to analyze risk factors for postdischarge infections, the major drivers of unplanned 30-day readmissions. RESULTS: We identified 86,403 vascular surgery patients for analysis. Thirty-day readmission occurred in 8827 (10%), of which 8054 (91%) were unplanned. Of the unplanned readmissions, 61% (n = 4951) were related to the index vascular surgery procedure. Infectious complications were the most common reason for a surgery-related readmission (1940 [39%]), with surgical site infection being the most common type of infection related to unplanned readmission. Multivariable analysis showed the top five preoperative risk factors for postdischarge infections were the presence of a preoperative open wound, inpatient operation, obesity, work relative value unit, and insulin-dependent diabetes (but not diabetes managed with oral medications). Cigarette smoking was a weak predictor and came in tenth in the mode (overall C index, 0.657). When operative and postoperative factors were included in the model, total operative time was the strongest predictor of postdischarge infectious complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.2 for each 1-hour increase in operative time), followed by presence of a preoperative open wound (OR, 1.5), inpatient operation (OR, 2), obesity (OR, 1.8), and discharge to rehabilitation facility (OR, 1.7; P < .001 for all). Insulin-dependent diabetes, cigarette smoking, dialysis dependence, and female gender were also predictive, albeit with smaller effects (OR, 1.1-1.3 for all; P < .001). The overall fit of the multivariable model was fair (C statistic, 0.686). CONCLUSIONS: Infectious complications dominate the reasons for unplanned 30-day readmissions in vascular surgery patients. We have identified preoperative, operative, and postoperative risk factors for these infections with the goal of reducing these complications and thus readmissions. Expected patient risk factors, such as diabetes, obesity, renal insufficiency, and cigarette smoking, were less important in predicting infectious complications compared with operative time, presence of a preoperative open wound, and inpatient operation. Our findings suggest that careful operative planning and expeditious operations may be the most effective approaches to reducing infections and thus readmissions in vascular surgery patients.

A Fourteen-Year Experience with Vascular Anomalies Encountered during Transaxillary Rib Resection for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Transaxillary approach to first rib resection and scalenectomy (TAFRRS) is a well-established technique for treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Although anatomic features encountered during TAFRRS are in general constant, vascular anomalies may be encountered but have not been described to date. Herein we describe vascular abnormalities encountered during TAFRRS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospective practice database of 224 operations for TOS performed in 172 patients from March 2000 to March 2014. We excluded 10 patients with missing operative reports, 3 reoperations on the same patient, and 8 non-transaxillary resections. We recorded vascular anomalies identified in operative reports and reviewed computed tomography imaging to delineate the nature of these abnormalities. RESULTS: The overall incidence of vascular anomalies was 11% (22 of 203 TAFRRS). Most patients with anomalies had venous TOS (vTOS) (9 patients, 41%), followed by 7 (32%) with neurogenic TOS (nTOS). The remainder of the patients had arterial TOS (aTOS) (6 patients, 27%). Seven patients (32%) had an abnormal subclavian artery (SCA) with 5 (23%) having an abnormal arterial course in the anterior scalene muscle (ASM); 6 patients (27%) had an abnormal internal mammary artery (IMA) originating from distal SCA; 4 (18%) had abnormalities in the supreme thoracic artery (bifurcation or duplication); 2 (9%) had an abnormal branch from the SCA with anomalous location in the operative field; and 3 (14%) had an abnormal large venous branch penetrating the ASM. In the 19 patients with arterial anomalies, 8 (42%) were recognized as arterial branches penetrating the ASM, and 11 (58%) were noticed as they had anomalous arterial locations within the operative field. Most arterial anomalies were seen in vTOS (9, 45%), followed by nTOS (7, 35%). No intraoperative vascular complications occurred. Perioperative complications included 1 occurrence of postoperative transfusion for bleeding following axillary drain discontinuation and 2 Horner's syndromes. One aberrant IMA was electively ligated to allow complete thoracic outlet decompression. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial anomalies during TAFRRS are encountered in 11% of operations, and may present with vessel locations in unusual areas within the operative field, or as abnormal vessels penetrating the ASM, thus making scalenectomy precarious. Careful attention must be paid to possible abnormal locations of vessels in the thoracic outlet to avoid bleeding complications.

Nonatherosclerotic limb ischemia: Prompt evaluation and diagnosis.

Limb ischemia is most often associated with atherosclerosis and older age. When a younger patient without risk factors for atherosclerosis presents with symptoms of limb ischemia, vascular occlusion may not be suspected initially, thus delaying diagnosis and treatment. Delayed diagnosis can lead to a poor outcome. Here, we describe several uncommon causes of limb ischemia and their initial presentations, workup, and treatment to help guide the practitioner in making a timely diagnosis in this unusual patient population.