Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 16(4): 509-17, 1985 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4066562

RESUMO

Thirty-five children with a history of vesicoureteric reflux or with recurrent urinary tract infections were randomly allocated to low-dose prophylactic treatment with pivmecillinam or nitrofurantoin. After 6-10 months they were crossed over to the alternate drug for another 6 months, but only 24 completed the study because of lack of compliance or intolerance to nitrofurantoin. There was no significant difference in the long-term prophylactic effect between the two drugs, the overall infection rate being 0.7/patient-year. Pivmecillinam was significantly better tolerated than nitrofurantoin (P = 0.01). Nitrofurantoin effected no major change in the faecal flora, and nearly all urinary infections occurring during long-term treatment were caused by Escherichia coli. In contrast, a marked reduction of E. coli and a marked increase in Gram-positive cocci were found in the faecal flora during treatment with pivmecillinam. Seventy per cent of infections were caused by Streptococcus faecalis and only 20% by E. coli during pivmecillinam treatment (P = 0.001).


Assuntos
Andinocilina Pivoxil/uso terapêutico , Andinocilina/uso terapêutico , Nitrofurantoína/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Andinocilina Pivoxil/administração & dosagem , Andinocilina Pivoxil/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Tolerância a Medicamentos , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Nitrofurantoína/administração & dosagem , Nitrofurantoína/efeitos adversos , Distribuição Aleatória , Recidiva , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA