Total Arterial Revascularization: Evaluating the Length of the Radial Artery in a Composite Graft Configuration.

PURPOSE: Reimplanting the radial artery in the left internal thoracic artery as a composite graft allows total arterial revascularization (TAR) without aortic manipulation. The limitation of this strategy is the length of the radial artery required to reach distal right coronary artery (RCA) branches. Our analysis focuses on the feasibility of this strategy. METHODS: A total of 169 patients underwent TAR using the radial artery in a composite grafting configuration. Length of the radial artery, number of sequential anastomoses, heart size, target location, length of the arm, patient height, body surface area, and flow in the composite graft were prospectively collected. RESULTS: The mean length of the radial artery was 18.02 cm. Patients with a mean length of the radial artery of 15.9 cm needed an extension of the radial artery with another conduit to reach the RCA distal branches. When T-configuration is used, the length of the radial artery should be 0.53 cm per sequential anastomosis to reach the RCA distal branches. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that an average length of 18.02 cm of radial artery is needed to reach targets on the RCA distal branches in composite grafting. In T-configuration, we need 0.53 cm more length per anastomosis to achieve TAR.

Long-term survival, cardiovascular, and functional outcomes after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting in 566 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Sternotomy has been the gold standard incision for surgical revascularization but may be associated with chronic pain and sternal malunion. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting allows for complete surgical revascularization through a small thoracotomy in selected patients. There is a paucity of long-term data, particularly functional outcomes, for patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Patients (N = 566) who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution over a 17-year period were prospectively followed. The primary outcome was survival. At late follow-up, patients were contacted for a questionnaire on functional outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model identified correlates of the primary outcome. RESULTS: Clinical follow-up was complete for 100% of patients (mean 7.0 ± 4.4 years); a follow-up questionnaire was also completed for 83.9% (N = 427) of live patients. Fifty percent of patients (N = 283) had undergone multivessel grafting. At 12 years, survival for the entire cohort was 82.2% ± 2.6%. On late follow-up questionnaire, 12 patients (2.8%) had greater than Canadian Cardiovascular Score Class II angina and 19 patients (4.5%) had greater than New York Heart Association Class II symptoms. More than 98% of patients did not have pain related to the incision site. Cox proportional hazards analysis identified older age, peripheral vascular disease, prior myocardial infarction, left ventricular dysfunction, cancer in the past 5 years, intraoperative transfusion, and hybrid revascularization as correlates of mortality during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is a safe and durable alternative to sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting in selected patients, with excellent short- and long-term outcomes, including for multivessel coronary disease. At long-term follow-up, the proportion of patients with significant symptoms and incisional pain was low.

Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Without Saphenous Vein Grafting: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Approximately 95% of patients of any age undergoing contemporary, coronary bypass surgery will receive at least 1 saphenous vein graft (SVG). It is recognized that SVG will develop progressive and accelerated atherosclerosis, resulting in a stenosis, and in occlusion that occurs in 50% by 10 years postoperatively. For arterial conduits, there is little evidence of progressive failure as for SVG. Could avoidance of SVG (total arterial revascularization [TAR]) lead to a different late (>5 year) survival? A literature review of 23 studies (N = 100,314 matched patients) at a mean 8.8 years postoperative found reduced all-cause mortality for TAR (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.71-0.84; P < 0.001). An expanded analysis with a new unpublished data set (N = 63,288 matched patients) was combined with the literature review (N = 127,565). It found reduced all-cause mortality for TAR (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.72-0.85; P < 0.001). Additional Bayesian analysis found a very high probability of a TAR-associated reduction all-cause mortality.

Extended Myectomy for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Early Outcomes From a Nascent Centre of Excellence in Canada.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is one of the commonest inherited cardiac abnormalities. The disorder is clinically and genetically heterogeneous and is characterized by left ventricular wall thickening that is not explained by abnormal loading conditions. HCM is estimated to affect between 1 in 200 and 1 in 500 people in the general population. In the majority of cases, HCM patients have a relatively benign course; however, if left untreated, this abnormality can lead to sudden cardiac death, especially in young adults and athletes. Therefore, early diagnosis is crucial to help implement the proper management for patients with HCM. In response to the growing need for more HCM centres of excellence in Canada, we developed one such centre at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute from the start of 2018. This centre will help in the early diagnosis and management of HCM patients, especially those with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction who might benefit from myectomy surgery. This paper describes our early experience with surgical myectomy in adult HCM patients between January 2018 and December 2020. We report the results of 27 patients with HCM who underwent myectomy surgery during the study period. All 27 patients survived to discharge, and all were still alive at 6 months postdischarge. Our experience highlights the crucial role that preoperative and perioperative imaging play in the management of this condition, in addition to the vital role of having a committed "heart team" of cardiologists, surgeons, and anesthesiologists.

La cardiomyopathie hypertrophique (CMH) est l'une des plus fréquentes anomalies cardiaques héréditaires. L'anomalie qui est cliniquement et génétiquement hétérogène est caractérisée par l'épaississement de la paroi du ventricule gauche qui n'est pas expliqué par des conditions de charge anormales. On estime que la CMH touche entre une personne sur 200 et une personne sur 500 dans la population générale. Dans la plupart des cas de CMH, l'évolution de la maladie est relativement bénigne. Toutefois, si cette anomalie n'est pas traitée, elle peut mener à la mort subite d'origine cardiaque, particulièrement chez les jeunes adultes et les athlètes. Par conséquent, le diagnostic précoce est crucial à la mise en œuvre d'une prise en charge adéquate des patients atteints de CMH. Pour répondre à la nécessité croissante d'un plus grand nombre de centres d'excellence sur la CMH au Canada, nous avons mis en place l'un de ces centres à l'Institut de cardiologie de l'Université d'Ottawa dès le début de 2018. Ce centre contribuera au diagnostic précoce et à la prise en charge des patients atteints de CMH, particulièrement des patients, dont la CMH est associée à une obstruction de la chambre de chasse du ventricule gauche, qui pourraient bénéficier d'une myectomie. Le présent article décrit nos premières expériences de myectomie chez les patients adultes atteints de CMH entre janvier 2018 et décembre 2020. Nous présentons les résultats de 27 patients atteints de CMH qui ont subi une myectomie durant la période étudiée. Les 27 patients ont survécu jusqu'à la sortie de l'hôpital, et étaient tous encore en vie six mois après. Notre expérience démontre le rôle crucial que joue l'imagerie en phase préopératoire et en phase périopératoire lors de la prise en charge de cette maladie, en plus du rôle essentiel de l'« équipe de cardiologie ¼ dévouée qui est composée de cardiologues, de chirurgiens et d'anesthésistes.

Preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension predicts occurrence of aortic insufficiency following aortic valve preservation and repair surgery.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative left ventricular (LV) end-systolic dimension (LVESD) ≥5.0 cm is a class IIa indication for surgical intervention for aortic insufficiency (AI); however, the effect of LV dilatation on the longevity of the aortic valve (AV) has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to assess the impact of preoperative LV dimension on the long-term outcome of AV preservation surgery. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, 256 patients underwent AV preservation surgery at a single center. The median duration of follow-up was 5 years. The primary outcome was the development of >1+ AI at 6 years; secondary outcomes include long-term mortality, freedom from >2+ AI, and freedom from AV reoperation. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify predictors of AV deterioration. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 0.8%, and mean survival at 8 years was 85.5 ± 3.4%. Mean freedom from >1+ AI at 6 years was 71.1 ± 3.4%. Patients with preoperative indexed LVESD (LVESDi) ≥2.0 cm/m2 were at greater risk of developing >1+ AI at 6 years compared with patients with preoperative LVESDi of 1.5 to 1.9 cm/m2 and ≤1.4 cm/m2 (50.3 ± 0.1% vs 80.9 ± 0.1% vs 92.2 ± 0.1%, respectively; P < .01). On risk-adjusted multivariable analysis, preoperative LVESDi was an independent predictor for recurrence of >1+ AI (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.4). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative LVESDi ≥2 cm/m2 is associated with increased risk of recurrent >1+ AI following AV preservation surgery. Further investigation of the appropriate operative threshold for AI may be warranted.

The Use of Intraoperative Transit Time Flow Measurement for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Systematic Review of the Evidence and Expert Opinion Statements.

Transit time flow measurement (TTFM) allows quality control in coronary artery bypass grafting but remains largely underused, probably because of limited information and the lack of standardization. We performed a systematic review of the evidence on TTFM and other methods for quality control in coronary artery bypass grafting following PRISMA standards and elaborated expert recommendations by using a structured process. A panel of 19 experts took part in the consensus process using a 3-step modified Delphi method that consisted of 2 rounds of electronic voting and a final face-to-face virtual meeting. Eighty percent agreement was required for acceptance of the statements. A 2-level scale (strong, moderate) was used to grade the statements based on the perceived likelihood of a clinical benefit. The existing evidence supports an association between TTFM readings and graft patency and postoperative clinical outcomes, although there is high methodological heterogeneity among the published series. The evidence is more robust for arterial, rather than venous, grafts and for grafts to the left anterior descending artery. Although TTFM use increases the duration and the cost of surgery, there are no data to quantify this effect. Based on the systematic review, 10 expert statements for TTFM use in clinical practice were formulated. Six were approved at the first round of voting, 3 at the second round, and 1 at the virtual meeting. In conclusion, although TTFM use may increase the costs and duration of the procedure and requires a learning curve, its cost/benefit ratio seems largely favorable, in view of the potential clinical consequences of graft dysfunction. These consensus statements will help to standardize the use of TTFM in clinical practice and provide guidance in clinical decision-making.

Comparative Analysis Following Implementation of Two Types of Y-Composite Multiarterial Revascularization Strategies at a Single Academic Institution.

Background We compared early outcomes, at a single academic institution, of implementing full coronary revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting using multiarterial Y-composite grafts with multiple sequential anastomoses. Methods and Results Clinical records of 425 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting using Y-grafting with left internal mammary artery and radial artery (Y-RA group) or right internal mammary artery (Y-RIMA group) from 2015 to 2019, were reviewed. These were compared with the institutional experience of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting cases (in situ on pump/off pump) for the same period of time. When comparing the 4 groups, the Y-RIMA/RA groups revealed a higher number of distal anastomosis than the in situ on- or off-pump groups. When the number of distal arterial anastomosis was analyzed, there was a superiority of using the Y-configuration compared with the in situ approach. Moreover, there were no significant differences among groups for mortality and/or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in hospital or at 30-day follow-up. A subanalysis comparing the Y-RIMA group with the Y-RA group showed that complementary grafts to the Y-construct were required to accomplish full revascularization more frequently in the Y-RIMA group. Full-arterial revascularization was achieved in 92.2% of the Y-RA group and 72.0% of the Y-RIMA group (P<0.001). In 82.8% of the Y-RA group and 30.8% of the Y-RIMA group, revascularization was completed as an anaortic procedure (P<0.001). Conclusions The 2 types of arterial Y-composite grafting were able to be introduced in the routine practice of our institution showing comparable results to the established institutional practice. This procedure allowed for more arterial distal anastomosis to be performed safely without compromising outcomes.

Moderate to Severe Acute Kidney Injury Leads to Worse Outcomes in Complex Thoracic Aortic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The impact of acute kidney injury (AKI) in thoracic aortic surgery is not well defined. This study aimed to examine the impact of varying severity of AKI on in-hospital and long-term outcome in these patients. METHODS: From 2004 to 2018, 1142 patients underwent thoracic aortic surgery at a single institution (University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada) and were stratified into 4 groups on the basis of the severity of postoperative AKI: no AKI (n = 705), Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) stage 1 (n = 261), AKIN stage 2 (n = 72), and AKIN stage 3 (n = 104). Outcomes include in-hospital mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of AKI. Propensity score matching was performed to identify pairs of patients without postoperative AKI or with AKIN stage 1 AKI, as well as pairs of patients without postoperative AKI and those with AKIN stage 2 or higher AKI. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for late survival. RESULTS: In the propensity-matched cohort, patients with postoperative AKIN stage I AKI had worse in-hospital mortality but comparable long-term survival when compared with patients without postoperative AKI. Patients with AKIN stage 2 or higher AKI experienced significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared with patients without postoperative AKI (15.9% vs 4.6%; P < .01) and worse 8-year survival (65.9% ± 34.1% vs 80.1% ± 20.0%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe AKI is a serious complication and is associated with significantly worse short- and long-term outcomes; targeting mild AKI with therapeutic intervention is an important step in improving patient outcomes.

Presentation and outcomes of mitral valve surgery in France in the recent era: a nationwide perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Unbiased information regarding the surgical management of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) at the nationwide level are scarce and mainly US-based. The Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information, a mandatory national database, offers the unique opportunity to assess the presentation and outcomes of all consecutive mitral valve (MV) surgeries performed in France in the contemporary era. METHODS: We collected all MV surgeries performed for MR in France in 2014-2016. MR aetiology was classified as degenerative (DMR), secondary (SMR) or Other (rheumatic or congenital disease and infective endocarditis). RESULTS: During the 3-year period, 18 167 MV surgeries were performed in France (55% repair and 45% replacement; 52% isolated). Age was 66±12 years and 59% were male. Aetiology was DMR in 42%, SMR in 16% and other in 42% including 19% with uncertain aetiologies. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 6.5% and increased with age, female gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, type of surgery (replacement vs repair), associated surgery (combined vs isolated) and MR aetiology (all p<0.01). In-hospital mortality and rate of death/readmission for heart failure (HF) at 1 year were 3.4% and 13%, respectively for DMR (2.4% and 11% for isolated DMR) and 7.8% and 27%, respectively for SMR (5.5% and 23% for isolated SMR). Repair rate was 55% overall, 68% in DMR and 72% for isolated DMR surgery (70% of all DMR). Repair rates decreased with age, Charlson Comorbidity Index and female sex (all p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional contemporary prospective nationwide database, in-hospital mortality and 1 year rate of death and HF readmission were considerable overall and in all subsets. Repair rates were suboptimal overall especially in the elderly and women subsets. These results underline the need to develop strategies to improve management and outcomes of patients with both DMR and SMR.

Dismal Outcomes and High Societal Burden of Mitral Valve Regurgitation in France in the Recent Era: A Nationwide Perspective.

Background Although US recent data suggest that mitral regurgitation (MR) is severely undertreated and carries a poor outcome, population-based views on outcome and management are limited. We aimed to define the current treatment standards, clinical outcomes, and costs related to MR at the nationwide level. Methods and Results In total, 107 412 patients with MR were admitted in France in 2014 to 2015. Within 1 year, 8% were operated and 92% were conservatively managed and constituted our study population (68% primary MR and 32% secondary MR). The mean age was 77±15 years; most patients presented with comorbidities. In-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were 4.1% and 14.3%, respectively. Readmissions were common (63% at least once and 37% readmitted ≥2 times). Rates of 1-year mortality or all-cause readmission and 1-year mortality or heart failure readmission were 67% and 34%, respectively, and increased with age, Charlson index, heart failure at admission, and secondary MR etiology; however, the event rate remained notably high in the primary MR subset (64% and 28%, respectively). The mean costs of hospital admissions and of readmissions were 5345±6432 and 10 080±10 847 euros, respectively. Conclusions At the nationwide level, MR was a common reason for admission and affected an elderly population with frequent comorbidities. Less than 10% of patients underwent a valve intervention. All subsets of patients who were conservatively managed incurred high mortality and readmissions rates, and MR represented a major societal burden with an extrapolated annual cost of 350 to 550 million euros (390-615 million US dollars). New strategies to improve the management and outcomes of patients with both primary and secondary MR are critical and warranted.

Optimal Configuration for Bypass of the Left Anterior Descending Artery During Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting.

BACKGROUND: The left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to left anterior descending (LAD) artery bypass remains the reference standard for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. With the advent of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting, optimal bypass configuration to the LAD is unclear. The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between LITA-LAD and right internal thoracic artery (RITA)-LAD configurations in BITA grafting. METHODS: The primary outcome was the need for percutaneous or surgical reintervention of the LAD. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. Cox proportional hazard and competing risk models were used with entropy weighting. RESULTS: Among BITA patients, 1527 had LITA-LAD grafts, and 523 RITA-LAD. Before entropy weighting, RITA-LAD patients were older with more diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and left ventricular dysfunction, more urgent status (P < .05), and more frequently performed off-pump (P < .001). Need for repeat revascularization of the LAD territory at 10 years was 2.8% in the LITA-LAD group and 1.8% in the RITA-LAD group (subhazard ratio = 0.686; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.296-1.589; P = .38). Adjusted survival at 10 years was 97.2% in the LITA-LAD group and 98.2% in the RITA-LAD group (hazard ratio = 1.056; 95% CI, 0.677-1.647; P = .81). There was no difference in cardiac mortality (subhazard ratio = 1.063; 95% CI, 0.502-2.251; P = .87). CONCLUSIONS: Use of either LITA or RITA for LAD grafting during BITA revascularization has no effect on long-term all-cause or cardiac mortality or need for repeat revascularization of the LAD. Cardiac surgeons should be confident in using a RITA-LAD bypass during BITA grafting.

Fractional Flow Reserve-Based Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) provides an objective measurement of the severity of ischemia caused by coronary stenoses in downstream myocardial regions. Data from the interventional cardiology realm have suggested benefits of a FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy. Limited evidence is available on the use of FFR to guide coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The most recent data have shown that FFR might simplify CABG procedures and optimize patency of arterial grafts without any clear impact on clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to summarize the available data on FFR-based CABG and discuss the rationale and potential consequences of a switch toward FFR-based surgical revascularization strategy.