[Development and treatment of cataract in myopic eye with phakic intraocular lens Fyodorov in the posterior chamber].

This is a case report of a female patient who, due to high myopia, had silicone phakic intraocular lens type Fyodorov with plate-haptics implanted in the posterior chamber (PC pIOLs). The anterior subcapsular cataract (ASC) resulted in significant reduction of visual acuity and, therefore, the patient, after 16 years of the first surgery, underwent another surgical intervention. She had the pIOLs explantation, phacoemulsification and implantation of the flexible intraocular lens (IL) in the capsular bag. Explantation of the pIOLs, cataract surgery by phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were carried out through the same clear corneal incision and the intraoperative course was uneventful. The visual acuity of the operated eye was equal to pre-cataract period.

Simultaneous injuries to both eyes in traffic accidents.

BACKGROUND: In traffic accidents, eye injuries occur as isolated or with polytrauma. They may involve just one eye, but simultaneous injuries to both eyes do happen occasionally. The aim of our paper was to reveal the risk factors, in an effort to reduce the number of such accidents and to prevent bilateral ocular damage. METHODS: All patients hospitalized at the Clinic of Eye Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, due to traffic accidents with bilateral eye injuries in a period of 9 years from the beginning of 2000 to the end of 2008 were analyzed. RESULTS: In this 9-year period, a total of 36 patients were hospitalized and treated for bilateral ocular injury (72 eyes). There were 23 males among them, the male-female ratio being 1.8:1. Mean age was 33.9 years. The occupations of injured persons were the following: the most common were workers--15, followed by clerks--seven, while less common were pupils, students, pensioners and housewives-three of each of them, and farmers--two. Front-seat passengers were the most common among the injured--20 (55.6%), then drivers--15 (41.7%), with only one passenger from the back seat on the right side (2.7%). As many as 33 (91.7%) of them failed to fasten their seat belts, while 18 (50.0%) were drunk. Penetrating bulbar injuries or eyeball ruptures were predominant--66.7%, while blunt injuries were found in only two (2.8%) eyes in one single person; but in 22 cases (30.5%) there was adnexal damage, too. Visual acuity at discharge and subsequent controls was as follows: amaurosis in 21 (29.2%), less than 0.3 in nine (5.6%), 0.4 and better in 42 (58.1%), and normal visual acuity of 1.0 in 28 patients (38.3%). CONCLUSION: The major risk factors for getting bilateral eye injuries in traffic accidents proved to be: sitting in the front car seats, not fastening the seat belt and alcohol intoxication. Prevention of these risk factors would result in a decrease in such a large number of bilateral eye injuries.

[Problems in diagnosis and extraction of foreign bodies from the orbit associated with pain]. / Problem dijagnostike i ekstrakcije stranog tela u orbiti pracenog bolovima.

The aim of this study was to present the troubles and significance of a proper diagnosis of a foreign body which caused a double perforation of the eyeball and was retained in the orbit. Another reason for this case report was the intensive pain associated with the existing foreign body in the orbit. A male, 54 years old, had a perforating wound of the eyeball caused by a metal foreign body, which stayed in the orbit close to the scleral wall. X-ray and echographic examinations of the orbit were not conclusive regarding the question whether this foreign body was situated within or outside the eyeball. Only CT imaging showed that foreign body produced a double perforation of the eyeball and was externally close to the sclera. Foreign body was extracted by transconjunctival anterior orbitotomy through the inferior fornix, using the electromagnetic probe. Since the first day of injury and up to the eighth day, the patient had intensive deep orbital pain, which was alleviated only partially by analgetics. It could not be explained by secondary glaucoma because IOP was normal or by an inflammatory process, or in any other way. Only the extraction of foreign body from the orbit led to the complete relief of pain. We believe that the pain was caused by compression of foreign body to some of scleral sensory nerves. X-ray and echographic examinations of the orbit are not always a reliable proof in the proper evaluation whether foreign body is within or outside the eyeball in the orbit. Precise diagnosis can be made only by CT imaging. The pain in the orbit may be caused by compression of foreign body to sensory nerves.