Thoracoscopic resection of congenital pulmonary malformations in infants: is the feasibility related to the size of the lesion?

BACKGROUND: The size of congenital pulmonary malformation (CPM) in infants might interfere with the feasibility of thoracoscopic resection. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of the size of CPM on the applicability of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in infants. METHODS: Twenty-two infants were operated on for CPM from November 2000 to June 2009. The intra- and postoperative course was analyzed retrospectively from patient charts. Preoperative scans were evaluated blindly by a radiologist to calculate the relation between the maximum size of the lesion and the thoracic diameter in VATS and open procedures. RESULTS: VATS was performed in 14 (64%) of the 22 patients and thoracotomy in 8. VATS was successfully performed in 11 (79%) of the 14 patients, whereas VATS was converted to thoracotomy due to lack of overview in 3 (21%). The mean relative size of CPM at preoperative imaging was 0.34 ± 0.05 (range: 0.3-0.4) in patients who received successful VATS, 0.57 ± 0.06 (range: 0.5-0.6) in converted cases, and 0.68 ± 0.10 (range: 0.5-0.8) in infants who underwent thoracotomy. The relative CPM size was significantly lower in successful VATS than in cases of conversion (P<0.01) and thoracotomy (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The relative size of CPM at preoperative imaging might be useful information for a decision-making on the use of VATS in infants. A relative CPM size below 0.5, which is less than half of the thoracic diameter, indicates a good feasibility for thoracoscopic resection of CPM. A larger size may indicate that VATS might be technically difficult.

Prior thoracic surgery has a limited impact on the feasibility of consecutive thoracoscopy in children: a prospective study on 228 procedures.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the impact of prior thoracic surgery on consecutive ipsilateral thoracoscopic surgery in children. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 228 thoracic procedures, which were performed in 190 children (99 male,91 female; mean age, 5.1 years; range, 1 day to 18 years) over a 7-year period (January 2000 to August 2007).Of these, 137 were thoracoscopies and 91 conventional operations. A panel of pediatric pulmonologists, anesthetists,and pediatric surgeons decided whether a thoracoscopy or a conventional approach was indicated. The endpoints were conversion rate, intraoperative events, and complications in subsequent thoracoscopies with regard to the type of prior thoracic surgery. In addition, the reasons for exclusion from thorascopy of those patients,who had a previous thoracic operation, should be identified. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (14%) had prior ipsilateral thoracic surgery; 20 of these underwent thoracoscopy,12 after prior thoracotomy and 8 after prior thoracoscopy. The type of initial approach had no significant impact on the conversion rate of subsequent thoracoscopy (1/12 after thoracotomy vs. 0/8 after thoracoscopy; not significant). The conversion rate was not significantly different in patients with or without prior surgery (1/20 vs. 19/117; not significant). However, there was a higher number of reconstructive procedures in patients without prior surgery, which was reflected in conversions due to lack of overview (n 12), bleeding (n 3), tension during reconstruction of a diaphragmatic defect (n 2) and esophageal atresia (n 2), and intraoperative respiratory problems (n 1). Twelve patients with a prior operation underwent thoracotomy due to limited respiratory capacity (n 5), advanced tumor stage, prior sternotomy (n 6), and limited visibility, leading to conversion during initial thoracoscopy (n 1). CONCLUSIONS: Prior thoracic operation has, independent of the initial approach, a limited impact on the feasibility of ipsilateral consecutive thoracoscopic surgery in children. The feasibility of thoracoscopy after prior operation is excellent.

Role of diagnostic and ablative minimally invasive surgery for pediatric malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric cancer is a matter of debate. The diagnostic and ablative roles of MIS were evaluated in a consecutive series of children with malignancies. METHODS: A prospective study, including all patients, who underwent abdominal and thoracic surgery for confirmed or highly suspected pediatric cancer was performed from September, 2000, to December, 2005. An interdisciplinary panel approved the indication for minimally invasive or conventional surgery. RESULTS: At a single institution, 301 operations were performed on 276 children with cancer. A minimally invasive approach was attempted in 90 of these patients (30%) and successfully employed in 69 (77%) of the operations. However, 21 operations (23%) were converted to an open approach. Regarding the abdominal operations attempted laparoscopically, 41 abdominal operations for biopsy or staging purposes were attempted laparoscopically (53%), but 6 were converted. In all, 139 abdominal resections were performed and 24 were attempted laparoscopically. Ten of these (42%) were converted. In 34 thoracic operations requiring biopsy, thoracoscopy was attempted in 14 (41%) and was successful in all but 1 (93%). Fifty-one thoracic tumors were resected and the thoracoscopic approach was attempted in 11 (22%) and successful in 7 (14%). Conversions from a minimally invasive operation to an open procedure occurred mainly due to limited visibility. Three bleeding complications occurred with 1 patient requiring a blood transfusion. In addition, 1 small bowel injury occurred with immediate laparoscopic closure. There were no port site recurrences after a median of 39 months. CONCLUSIONS: MIS is a reliable diagnostic tool for pediatric abdominal and thoracic malignancy. The role of ablative MIS in pediatric cancer remains limited.