Does the use of Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the UK. Reconstruction - of which implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most common - forms a core part of surgical management of breast cancer. More recently, pre-pectoral IBBR has become common as technology and operative techniques have evolved. Many surgeons use acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in reconstruction however there is little evidence in literature that this improves surgical outcomes. This review will assess available evidence for surgical outcomes for breast reconstructions using ADM versus non-use of ADM. METHODS: A database search was performed of Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2012-2022). Studies were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Risk of Bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale and ROBIS tools. Analysis and meta-analysis were performed. RESULTS: This review included 22 studies (3822 breast reconstructions). No significant difference between overall complications and failure rates between ADM and non-ADM use was demonstrated. Capsular contracture, wound dehiscence and implant rippling had significant differences however these results demonstrated high heterogeneity thus wider generalisation may be inaccurate. Patient quality of life scores were not recorded consistently or comparably between papers. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests a lack of significant differences in most complications between ADM use and non-use for pre-pectoral IBBR. If no increase in complications exists between groups, this has significant implications for surgical and legislative decision-making. There is, however, inadequate evidence available on the topic and further research is required.

A systematic review of generative adversarial networks (GANs) in plastic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are a form of deep learning architecture based on the zero-sum game theory, which uses real data to generate realistic fake data. GANs use two opposing neural networks working: a generator and a discriminator. They represent a powerful tool for generating realistic synthetic patient data sets and can potentially revolutionize research. This systematic literature review evaluated the scale and scope of GANs within plastic surgery, constructing a framework for its use and evaluation within subspecialties. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review was performed for applications of GANs in plastic surgery from 2014 to 2022. Three independent reviewers screened from databases: PubMed, Embase, PsychInfo, Scopus, and Google Scholar. RESULTS: A total of 70 studies were captured by the search, of which seven studies met our criteria. The most common subspecialty was craniofacial (n = 4). Proposed uses of GANs included facial recognition, burn estimation, scar prediction, and post-breast cancer reconstruction anomaly scoring. GANs were conditional, trained on data sets averaging 54,652 ± 112,180 samples, with some sourced publicly and others being primary. CONCLUSION: GANs hold promise for advancing plastic surgery, backed by diverse applications in the literature. Studies should follow a standardized reporting structure for consistency and transparency, as outlined, especially regarding the data sets used to ensure appropriate representation from an ethnic and cultural diversity perspective. Although GANs require specialist computational expertise to create, surgeons need to understand their development by leveraging the full potential of GANs within the emerging field of computational plastic surgery and beyond.