Twelve-year follow-up after discontinuation of preseasonal grass pollen immunotherapy in childhood.

BACKGROUND: In a previous controlled study, we demonstrated that preseasonal grass pollen immunotherapy for 3 years was effective in children. Moreover, a significant clinical benefit could still be observed 6 years after discontinuation of specific immunotherapy (SIT). In the current study, we examined the same group of patients again to investigate whether there is a prolonged benefit 12 years after SIT is stopped. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with previous SIT (from 1989 through 1991) or standardized seasonal pharmacotherapy only were prospectively followed during the grass pollen season of 2003. Primary end points were symptom score, medication use, and combined symptom and medication score. In addition, skin prick test reactivity, development of new sensitizations, and prevalence of seasonal asthma were evaluated. RESULTS: Total hay fever symptom score (P < 0.03), use of medication (P < 0.05), and combined symptom and medication score (P < 0.03) remained lower in patients with previous SIT when compared with the control group. Decreased immediate skin response to grass pollen returned 12 years after cessation of SIT. The percentage of new sensitization, however, continued to be significantly smaller in patients with previous SIT (58%) compared with the controls (100%, P < 0.05). There was a tendency for lower prevalence of seasonal asthma in the post-SIT group (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: This prospective controlled prolonged follow-up study demonstrates the ongoing clinical benefit 12 years after discontinuation of SIT. Furthermore, the reduction in onset of new sensitization, which was found 6 years after discontinuation of SIT, is sustained 6 years later.

Long-term efficacy of preseasonal grass pollen immunotherapy in children.

BACKGROUND: In a previous controlled study we demonstrated that preseasonal grass pollen immunotherapy for three years was effective in children. In the current study we examined the same group of patients to see if there is still a benefit six years after discontinuation of treatment. METHODS: Thirteen of 14 patients with previous specific immunotherapy (SIT) and 10 out of 14 patients of the control group were prospectively followed during the grass pollen season. Outcome measures were seasonal symptom scores for eyes, nose and chest, the use of symptomatic medication and visual analog scale. Objective measures included skin prick test reactivity to seasonal and perennial allergens and conjunctival provocation testing. RESULTS: During the 13 week observation time scores for overall hayfever symptoms (P < 0.004) and individual symptoms for eyes (P < 0.02), nose (P < 0.04) and chest (P < 0.01) as well as combined symptom and medication scores (P < 0.002) remained lower in the group with previous SIT. Only 23% of patients with previous pollen-asthma who had received SIT experienced pollen-associated lower respiratory tract symptoms compared to 70% in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the use of pharmacological treatment during the pollen season except for asthma medication. The average visual analog scale was lower in the post-SIT group (P < 0.05). Six years after cessation of SIT the immediate skin response to grass pollen remained decreased compared to the reaction of the controls (P < 0.01). There was also a tendency for higher allergen concentration to provoke a conjunctival response in the post-SIT group but without reaching statistical significance. Eight years after commencement of SIT, 61% of the initially pollen-monosensitized children had developed new sensitization to perennial allergens compared to 100% in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is still a significant clinical benefit six years after discontinuation of preseasonal grass pollen immunotherapy in childhood. SIT in children with pollen-allergy reduces onset of new sensitization and therefore has the potential to modify the natural course of allergic disease.