Homeless status documentation at a metropolitan hospital emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the prevalence of homelessness in consecutive patients presenting to a metropolitan hospital ED measured via a prospective housing screen with the prevalence of homelessness determined via retrospective audit of hospital data. Factors that altered the odds of patients being homeless and service outcomes that differed were examined for screened patients. METHODS: All patients presenting to the ED during a 7 day period in 2017 were invited to complete a housing screen. A retrospective audit of all ED presentations during the same period also occurred. Demographic (e.g. age, gender), clinical (e.g. reason for presentation, ED presentation history) and arrival mode (e.g. time, how arrived) predictors of homeless status were examined alongside care outcomes (e.g. ED length of stay, admission and 28 day re-presentation). RESULTS: Of 1208 presenting patients, 504 were prospectively screened and 7.9% were homeless. This compared with 0.8% of ED presentations coded as homeless in the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset and 2.3% of the 704 non-screened patients identified as homeless using Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset Usual Accommodation alongside primary diagnosis and registration address. Within the screened sample, homeless patients were more likely to be male, arrive by emergency ambulance/with police, have a psychosocial diagnosis, and be frequent presenters. Re-presentation within 28 days occurred for 43% of homeless and 15% of not-homeless patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital ED administrative data substantially under-recognises the prevalence of homelessness in presenting patients. Standardised use of brief housing screens could improve identification of and provision of support to this often highly vulnerable population.

Review article: Workplace violence in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta analysis.

Patient or visitor perpetrated workplace violence (WPV) has been reported to be a common occurrence within the ED. No universal definition of violence or recording of such events exists. In addition ED staff are often reluctant to report violent incidents. The true incidence of WPV is therefore unclear. This systematic review aimed to quantify WPV in EDs. The association of WPV to drug and alcohol exposure was explored. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo and the Cochrane Library were searched from their commencement to 10 March 2016. MeSH terms and text words for ED, violence and aggression were combined. A meta-analysis was conducted on the primary outcome variable-proportion of violent patients among total ED presentations. A secondary meta-analysis used studies reporting on proportion of drug and alcohol affected patients occurring within the violent population. The search yielded a total of 8720 records. A total of 7235 were unique and underwent abstract screening. A total of 22 studies were deemed relevant according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Retrospective study design predominated, analysing mainly security records and incident reports. The rates of violence from individual studies ranged from 1 incident to 172 incidents per 10 000 presentations. The pooled incidence suggests there are 36 violent patients for every 10 000 presentations to the ED (95% confidence interval 0.0030-0.0043). WPV in the ED was commonly reported. There is wide heterogeneity across the study methodology, definitions and rates. More standardised recording and reporting may inform preventive measures and highlight effective management strategies.