New fluorescence polarization immunoassays for analysis of barbiturates and benzodiazepines in serum and urine: performance characteristics.

The performance of the new fluorescence polarization immunoassay reagents Cassette COBAS INTEGRA Serum Benzodiazepines assay (SBENZ) and Cassette Serum Barbiturates assay (SBARB) was evaluated as compared to other immunoassays (Abbott TDx Serum Benzodiazepines, Abbott TDx Urine Benzodiazepines, Behring EMIT Serum Benzodiazepines, Abbott ADx Serum Barbiturates, Behring EMIT Serum Barbiturates, and the COBAS INTEGRA Barbiturates (BARB) urine assay) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Recoveries of nordiazepam and secobarbital using the SBENZ and SBARB assays, respectively, were equivalent for serum, plasma, and urine. Cross-reactivities of structurally related benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and their metabolites were very similar in serum and urine for the SBENZ and SBARB assays. Precision was within 5.4% for SBENZ serum and within 11% from 10 to 100 ng/mL for urine. Precision was within 5% for SBARB serum and within 7% from 136 to 277 ng/mL for the urine application. The standard curves for SBENZ and SBARB were stable for at least 16 weeks with the reagents stored open on the COBAS INTEGRA analyzer. Clinical comparison of the SBENZ serum assay indicated an increased pickup rate, as confirmed by GC-MS, compared to TDx and EMIT. The diagnostic sensitivities of the SBENZ serum application, TDx, and EMIT versus GC-MS were 100%, 89%, and 36%, respectively. The diagnostic specificities were 71%, 79%, and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivities of the SBENZ urine application and TDx versus GC-MS were 100% and the diagnostic specificities were 88%. The increased positive pick-up of the SBENZ assay compared to the other immunoassays is most probably due to the difference in the limit of detection (LOD) and the increased cross-reactivity for the low-dose benzodiazepines. Clinical comparison of the SBARB serum assay indicated an increased positive pick-up rate, as confirmed by GC-MS. The diagnostic sensitivities of the SBARB serum application, ADx, and EMIT versus GC-MS were 96%, 65%, and 35%, respectively. The diagnostic specificities were all 100%. The diagnostic sensitivities for the SBARB urine application and BARB versus GC-MS were all 100%, and the diagnostic specificities were all 91%. The SBENZ and SBARB kits demonstrated increased sensitivity for the detection of benzodiazepines and barbiturates in both serum and urine compared to the other immunoassays.

Comparison of the serum barbiturate fluorescence polarization immunoassay by the COBAS INTEGRA to a GC/MS method.

The authors evaluated a new Cassette Serum Barbiturates fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) on the COBAS INTEGRA. The assay was calibrated with secobarbital standards at 0, 0.5, and 4.0 microg/mL. The assay range was 0.030 to 80 microg/mL using an automatic 1/20 postdilution feature. Precision was established for two COBAS INTEGRA instruments for ten days by assaying secobarbital target concentrations ranging from 0.125 to 2.2 microg/mL. The coefficients of variation (CV) for the above target concentrations for the first instrument ranged from 2.7% to 8.3%, and for a second instrument, 3.8 to 8.3%. Seven clinically elevated bilirubin samples were spiked with 0.46 and 1.77 microg/mL secobarbital. Bilirubin interference was less than 10.9 and less than 7.9%, respectively. The average recovery ranged from 85% to 94%. The mean difference in recovery in serum versus plasma was < or = 3%. Fifty-two clinical samples were analyzed for butalbital, pentobarbital, secobarbital, and phenobarbital by GC/MS, and the results were compared to the new Cassette Serum Barbiturates FPIA. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 95% and 100%, respectively. Both FPIA and GC/MS assays are clinically efficacious for monitoring serum barbiturates.

Acute zolpidem overdose--report of two cases.

This report describes two cases of acute zolpidem overdose. The decedent in the first case was a 36-year-old female found dead in bed in her secured home. She had a history of psychiatric illness, including paranoid disorder, depression with panic episodes, and post-traumatic stress disorder. She was treated with risperidone and sertraline. Nine months prior to her death, the decedent was also prescribed zolpidem (Ambien). The postmortem examination revealed white foam within the larynx and upper trachea, which is indicative of pulmonary edema. Toxicological analyses of the urine showed the presence of caffeine, risperidone, and zolpidem. Subsequent quantitation of postmortem iliac serum revealed 5.6 microg/L of 9-hydroxyrisperidone and the following zolpidem concentrations: blood (subclavian), 4.5 mg/L; blood (iliac), 7.7 mg/L; vitreous humor, 1.6 mg/L; bile, 8.9 mg/L; urine, 1.2 mg/L; liver, 22.6 mg/kg; and gastric contents, 42 mg. The second case involved a 58-year old female, also found dead in bed, with white foam around her mouth. The decedent had a 25-year history of hypertension and mental illness--manic depression and schizophrenia. She was medicated with carbamazepine, naproxen, risperidone, and zolpidem. The postmortem examination revealed cardiomegaly, pulmonary edema, hepatomegaly, mild coronary atherosclerosis, and no signs of trauma. Toxicological analyses of the urine showed the presence of zolpidem and carbamazepine and metabolite. Zolpidem concentrations were as follows: blood (iliac), 1.6 mg/L; vitreous humor, 0.52 mg/L; bile, 2.6 mg/L; liver, 12 mg/kg; and gastric contents, 0.9 mg. The zolpidem blood concentrations of these cases are consistent with those of the previously published fatalities. The blood/vitreous humor ratios of zolpidem were 2.81 (subclavian) and 4.81 (iliac) in the first case and 3.08 (iliac) in the second case. These ratios, along with the sampling times of blood and vitreous humor for both cases, are not conclusive to indicate a definitive presence or absence of postmortem drug redistribution of zolpidem. The cause of death for both cases was determined to be acute zolpidem overdose, and manner of death was suicide.

Self-intoxication with morphine obtained from an infusion pump.

A 36-year-old Caucasian male was found unresponsive by his wife. He had white foam around his mouth and was pronounced dead shortly thereafter. He had a history of back pain and was treated with intrathecal morphine because of his previous addiction to oral opiate medications. Because of crimping of the pump catheter, it was replaced 4 days before his death. Toxicological findings included urine screen positive for amitriptyline, nortriptyline, opiates, hydrocodone metabolites, ibuprofen, acetaminophen, caffeine, nicotine, and metabolite. Drug concentrations were as follows: blood, 0.260 mg/L amitriptyline, 0.160 mg/L nortriptyline, 0.460 mg/L unconjugated morphine, and 0.624 mg/L total morphine; vitreous humor, 0.034 mg/L unconjugated morphine and 0.080 mg/L total morphine; and cerebrospinal fluid, 0.099 mg/L unconjugated morphine and 0.095 mg/L total morphine. Shortly after death, the volume of the residual pump reservoir was only 8 mL instead of the expected 17 mL. Testing by the FDA showed that the pump was functional. The residual content of the pump accounted for only 230 mg instead of the expected 488 mg. The high blood-morphine concentrations did not correlate with the intrathecal infusion dose. The symptoms were consistent with opiate overdose, possibly by injection of morphine withdrawn from the pump reservoir. The cause of death was determined to be fatal morphine self-intoxication, and the manner of death was accidental. This case is intended to alert regulatory agencies, pain management health professionals, pathologists, and toxicologists to the abuse potential of one of the newer analgesic-delivery systems.