RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Cogan's syndrome is a rare form of vasculitis mainly affecting young subjects of whatever gender, associating cochleovestibular and ophthalmological damage. Despite medical treatment, auditory prognosis is uncertain, with 50-60% of patients showing irreversible severe to profound hearing loss, thus being candidates for cochlear implantation. Following CARE guidelines, we report 10 cases of cochlear implantation in Cogan's syndrome, with assessment of speech reception threshold and maximum intelligibility after a minimum 1 year's experience with the implant. CASE SERIES: Ten patients from 4 centers received cochlear implants (14 implants) for Cogan's syndrome between 2005 and 2020. After 1 year's experience, there was significant improvement in speech reception threshold (P=0.0002) and maximum intelligibility (P=0.0002). CONCLUSION-DISCUSSION: Audiovestibular signs associated with ophthalmological manifestations should suggest Cogan's syndrome. Hearing impairment is usually irreversible. Cochlear implantation may be necessary and improves hearing performance.
Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Síndrome de Cogan , Humanos , Síndrome de Cogan/complicações , Síndrome de Cogan/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Cogan/terapia , FalaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate predictive factors for revision surgery in otosclerosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicentre study in four tertiary centres. The primary objective was to investigate factors that were predictive of the need for revision stapes surgery. RESULTS: The 'revision' group included 145 patients, and the 'control' group included 143 patients. This study identified statistically significant predictive factors for the need for revision surgery: younger age, active smoking status, dyslipidaemia and high blood pressure. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of surgical technique or stapedotomy technique. CONCLUSION: This study showed that patients who are candidates for primary stapes surgery with younger age, active smoking status, dyslipidaemia and high blood pressure are at higher risk of needing revision surgery. A holistic approach prior to stapes surgery with multidisciplinary assessment is recommended. These results are important for better patient counselling on expected outcomes and risks.
Assuntos
Otosclerose , Cirurgia do Estribo , Humanos , Otosclerose/cirurgia , Reoperação , Cirurgia do Estribo/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Multi-centre study of the National French Registry (EPIIC) of patients with cochlear implants, focusing on infants who were operated-on under the age of 24 months between 2012 and 2016. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 615 profoundly deaf infants, who received cochlear implants (CIs) before their second birthday, were included in the registry by different CI centers. Epidemiological, surgical, speech therapy and school, follow-up data were included in the registry, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months thereafter. The following parameters were studied: type of implantation (uni- or bilateral), complications, cause of deafness, category of auditory perception (CAP), Open-set word recognition score (OSW), speech intelligibility rating, lexical comprehension with EVIP (Peabody), communication mode and type of schooling. Bilateral simultaneous CI (BiCI) and unilateral CI (UniCI) groups were compared. RESULTS: There were 744 implantations. The explantation-reimplantation rate, within the four-year follow-up, was just 3.6%. Mean implantation age was 16.0 months, and similar in the two groups (BiCI/UniCI). A total of 51% of children had their first implant between 12 and 18 months, and 15% before 12 months. Implantation was unilateral in 52% of cases. Fifty-six percent of the bilateral procedures were sequential, with a mean delay of 16.8 months for the second implantation. The cause of deafness was unknown in 52% of cases. Of the 48% (297/615) of attributed cases, 32% had clear genetic causes. The remaining deafness was due to cytomegalovirus (CMV, 8%), inner-ear malformation (5%) and meningitis (3%). The main complications were from infections (47%) and internal device failure (25%). Four years post-operation, 84% of the UniCI and 75% of BiCl groups had a CAP≥5, and 83% of UniCl and 100% BiCI had OSW≥80%. Furthermore 74% of UniCI and 77% of BiCI communicated orally and 85% of UniCI and 90% of BiCI integrated into mainstream schooling. CONCLUSION: The French Registry of cochlear implants (EPIIC) is the only such national registry in the world. Our analysis illustrates the immediate benefits of, either single or double, cochlear implantation for language, perception skills and schooling.
Assuntos
Percepção Auditiva , Linguagem Infantil , Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Surdez/reabilitação , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implante Coclear/métodos , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Comunicação , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/instrumentação , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Surdez/etiologia , Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/métodos , Educação de Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguimentos , França , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Inclusão Escolar/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições Acadêmicas , Inteligibilidade da Fala , Fonoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Cochlear and brainstem implants have been included on the list of reimbursable products (LPPR) in France since March of 2009. The implants were initially inscribed for 5 years, after which an application for renewal with the French National Commission for the Evaluation of Medical Devices and Health Technologies (Commission Nationale d'évaluation des dispositifs médicaux et des technologies de santé - CNEDiMTS) was required [Haute Autorité de santé, 2009]. Upon registration to the list of reimbursable products, the companies and the reference centers for cochlear and brainstem implants were asked to set up a post-registration registry called EPIIC. This article reports the evolution in the EPIIC registry of the general indicators for 5051 patients over the five years from 2012-2016.
Assuntos
Implantes Auditivos de Tronco Encefálico/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Comitês Consultivos/organização & administração , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Implantes Auditivos de Tronco Encefálico/economia , Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/economia , Segurança Computacional , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Aprovação de Equipamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , França , Guias como Assunto/normas , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/economia , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Controle de Qualidade , Padrões de Referência , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
This study aims to determine the frequency and causes of cochlear explants with re-implantation (ERI) after 5 years' follow up of the patients included in the French national EPIIC (étude post-inscription des implants cochléaires) registry tracking patients with cochlear implantation. This multicenter, descriptive prospective study was conducted on 5051 patients enrolled in the EPIIC database between January 2012 and December 2016. Ninety-five patients (1.9%) received a primary implant and an ERI during the study. Of these, four benefitted from two ERIs. The number of ERIs was significantly higher in the pediatric population than among adults. The explantation and reimplantation were performed simultaneously in 86% of cases. The reasons for explantation were: in 46.4% of cases linked to a malfunction of the implant, and in 39.3% of cases for medical or surgical reasons. The number of electrodes inserted was significantly higher after the ERI than after the first implantation. There was just one post-ERI infection for these 95 explanted and re-implanted patients. As well as explantation with reimplantation rarely being necessary, it generally presents no major surgical difficulty and in most cases it allows a better integration than in the first implantation.
Assuntos
Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , França , Humanos , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Falha de Prótese , Reimplante/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate peri- and post-operative complications related to cochlear implantations. We searched for risk factors predicting these complications and analyzed the complications in the youngest and most elderly. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of cochlear implant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent cochlear implantation in France between January 2012 and December 2016 were anonymized and registered in the EPIIC database. This population included 3483 adults and 2245 children. Their demographic and surgical data and their incidence of peri- or post-operative complications, including their severity, whether major or minor, were all indicated. RESULTS: The global complication rate was 6.84%. The risk of complication was higher in initial implantation versus reimplantation (P<0.0001). The risk was also higher for bilateral implantation versus unilateral (P<0.0001). Complications were more frequent for patients with cochlear malformation (P=0.002). There was no difference in complication rates across age groups; babies under 1 year old, and the elderly over 80 and even over 90, did not have more complications than the rest of the population. Patients treated in the daily care unit had no more complications than those who were hospitalized for one night or more (P=0.64). CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation is a safe technique with a low incidence of complications. The absence of increased risk in patients at the extremes of the age spectrum justifies offering this solution to all, without age limitation.
Assuntos
Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cóclea/anormalidades , Implante Coclear/métodos , Hospital Dia/estatística & dados numéricos , França/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate in France the outcomes of cochlear implantation outside the selection criteria, off-label. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study including adults and children having received a cochlear implant (CI) in an off-label indication, that is outside the criteria established by the "Haute Autorité de santé (HAS)" in 2012. The data was collected from the "EPIIC" registry on recipients who received CIs in France between 2011 and 2014. Speech audiometry was performed at 60dB preimplantation and after one year of CI use, as well as an evaluation of the scores of the quality of life with the APHAB questionnaire, the scores for CAP and the professional/academic status in pre- and post-implantation conditions. Major and minor complications at surgery have been recorded. RESULTS: In total, 590 patients (447 adults and 143 children) with an off-label indication for CIs were included in this study from the EPIIC registry (11.7% of the whole cohort of EPIIC). For adults, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 41% in preimplantation condition versus 53% after one year of CI use (P<0.001) and 60% versus 71% in dissyllabic word lists (P<0.001). The CAP scores were 5 versus 6 in pre- and post-implantation conditions respectively (P<0.001) and the APHAB scores were statistically lower after implantation (P<0.001). In the children cohort, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 51% in preimplantation condition and 65% after CI (P<0.001), and 48% versus 82% (P<0.001) for dissyllabic word lists. The CAP scores were 5 versus 7 respectively in pre- and post-CI conditions (P<0.001). Thirty-two minor complications (5.4%) and 17 major complications (2.8%) were reported in our panel of off-label indication patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a revision of the cochlear implantation candidacy criteria is necessary to allow more patients with severe or asymmetric hearing loss to benefit from a CI when there is an impact on quality of life despite the use of an optimal hearing aid.
Assuntos
Implante Auditivo de Tronco Encefálico/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação , Seleção de Pacientes , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Audiometria da Fala/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Uso Off-Label/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the performance of cochlear implants in French patients aged 65 and over, implanted between 2012 and 2016, using data from the French national registry for cochlear implants (EPIIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The French national registry incorporates patient data from before implantation and for three years after implantation, stratified in different age groups (18-39, 40-64years, 65-74years and>75years). Here, we assessed the latter two categories. Hearing was assessed using mono- and disyllabic words in a silent background. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) scale was also implemented and subjects took the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (Aphab) questionnaire. RESULTS: The population aged over 65 accounted for 38% (n=1193) of the 3178 adult implanted patients. The performance for mono- and disyllabic words in silence, the CAP scores and the APHAB questionnaire answers for ease of communication, background noise and reverberation were dramatically improved at one year post-implantation (P<0.0001 for each score) and remained stable between one and three years thereafter. The percentage improvement was similar across all age groups. The scores for loud-noise intolerance did not change after cochlear implantation in any age group. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implants improve hearing and communication in subjects aged 65 and over, with comparable efficiency to that achieved in younger subjects. Cochlear implantation should thus be proposed whenever hearing aids provide only limited benefit. However, between 2012 and 2016, cochlear implantation was given to less than 1% of the French population aged 65 and over with profound deafness.
Assuntos
Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Percepção Auditiva , Implante Coclear/métodos , Comunicação , Feminino , França , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Testes Auditivos/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ruído/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the incidence and results of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults and children in France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of data in the French national registry of cochlear implantations from January 1st 2012 to December 31st 2016. Functional results from CAP (Category of Auditory Performance) questionnaires and speech audiometry tests, with mono- and di-syllabic word-lists, were compared before and after implantation. Speech audiometry tests were carried out against a noisy background, except before simultaneous implantations. RESULTS: Nine hundred and forty two bilateral cochlear implantations were performed during this period, that is, 16.4% of all cochlear implantations. Five hundred and eighty eight bilateral implantations were performed sequentially. 59% of the bilateral implantations were performed in children. Bilateral implants significantly improved CAP scores in all cases (P<0.001). Auditory performance, with the two types of word-list, were significantly improved after simultaneous implantation (P<0.01). After sequential implantation, the speech discrimination score, already very good with the first implant, reached 63±26% [0-100] with monosyllabic word lists, and 72±28% [0-100] with dissyllabic words. There were more complications due to surgery in bilateral cases than in the entire population of cochlear recipients (9.1% vs 6.4%, P<0.02). CONCLUSION: Hearing is significantly improved by simultaneous cochlear implantation. For sequential implantation, at one year, when auditory results were already excellent from the first implant, in the bimodal condition CAP scores were significantly improved, although there was no further change in speech audiometry in noise.
Assuntos
Implante Coclear/métodos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Surdez/reabilitação , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Audiometria da Fala/métodos , Percepção Auditiva , Criança , Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Surdez/etiologia , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Testes de Discriminação da Fala/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
This study concerns the results of cochlear implantation in children and adults from French cochlear implantation centers, monitored at one, two and three years by the Cochlear Implant French Registry EPIIC. This multicenter study enrolled 2603 subjects (1667 adults and 936 children) implanted in one ear. The following parameters were studied: hearing overall performances, monosyllabic or dissyllabic word perception, speech intelligibility, self-assessment questionnaire of Cochlear Implant (CI) benefits (Abbreviated profile of Hearing aid Benefit); professional activity and schooling. This study confirms the ceiling effect in adults' performances after the 1st year and the progressive growth in children's performances. It also shows that the contralateral hearing aid enhances performances compared to the CI alone condition, in all follow-up sessions. The French register of CIs is the only worldwide register of systematic follow-up on a period of three years and more of all adults and children implanted in a country.
Assuntos
Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Surdez/reabilitação , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Percepção Auditiva , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Educação , Emprego , Seguimentos , França , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Inteligibilidade da Fala , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The authors present the guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (Société française d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie de la face et du cou - SFORL) on the indications for cochlear implantation in children. METHODS: A multidisciplinary work group was entrusted with a review of the scientific literature on the above topic. Guidelines were drawn up, based on the articles retrieved and the group members' individual experience. They were then read over by an editorial group independent of the work group. The guidelines were graded as A, B, C or expert opinion, by decreasing level of evidence. RESULTS: The SFORL recommends that children with bilateral severe/profound hearing loss be offered bilateral cochlear implantation, with surgery before 12months of age. In sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with severe/profound hearing loss, it is recommended to reduce the interval between the two implants, preferably to less than 18months. The SFORL recommends encouraging children with unilateral cochlear implants to wear contralateral hearing aids when residual hearing is present, and recommends assessing perception with hearing-in-noise tests. It is recommended that the surgical technique should try to preserve the residual functional structures of the inner ear as much as possible.
Assuntos
Implantes Cocleares , Fatores Etários , Percepção Auditiva , Transtorno do Espectro Autista , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Surdez/cirurgia , França , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Auxiliares de Audição , Humanos , Lactente , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Qualidade de Vida , Sociedades Médicas , Testes de Função VestibularRESUMO
The authors present the guidelines of the French Society of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL) regarding indications for cochlear implantation in adults. After a literature review by a multidisciplinary workgroup, guidelines were drawn up based on retrieved articles and group-members' experience, then read over by an independent reading group to edit the final version. Guidelines were graded A, B, C or "expert opinion" according to decreasing level of evidence. There is no upper age limit to cochlear implantation in the absence of proven dementia and if autonomy is at least partial. Bilateral implantation may be proposed if unilateral implantation fails to provide sufficiently good spatial localization, speech perception in noise and quality of life, and should be preceded by binaural hearing assessment. Rehabilitation by acoustic and electrical stimulation may be proposed when low-frequency hearing persists. Quality of life should be assessed before and after implantation.
Assuntos
Implante Coclear/normas , Otolaringologia/normas , Idoso , Implante Coclear/métodos , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/reabilitação , França , Perda Auditiva/complicações , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new transcutaneous bone-conduction implant (BCI BB) in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss or with single-sided deafness (SSD), 1 year after surgical implantation. The study design is multicentric prospective, intra-subject measurements. Each subject is his/her own control. The setting is nine university hospitals: 7 French and 2 Belgian. Sixteen subjects with conductive or mixed hearing loss with bone-conduction hearing thresholds under the upper limit of 45 dB HL for each frequency from 500 to 4000 Hz, and 12 subjects with SSD (contralateral hearing within normal range) were enrolled in the study. All subjects were older than 18 years. The intervention is rehabilitative. The main outcome measure is the evaluation of skin safety, audiological measurements, benefit, and satisfaction questionnaires with a 1-year follow up. Skin safety was rated as good or very good. For the mixed or conductive hearing loss groups, the average functional gain (at 500 Hz, 1, 2, 4 kHz) was 26.1 dB HL (SD 13.7), and mean percentage of speech recognition in quiet at 65 dB was 95 % (vs 74 % unaided). In 5/6 SSD subjects, values of SRT in noise were lower with BB. Questionnaires revealed patient benefit and satisfaction. The transcutaneous BCI is very well tolerated at 1-year follow up, improves audiometric thresholds and intelligibility for speech in quiet and noise, and gives satisfaction to both patients with mixed and conductive hearing loss and patients with SSD.
Assuntos
Condução Óssea , Perda Auditiva Condutiva/cirurgia , Satisfação do Paciente , Próteses e Implantes , Adulto , Audiometria , Feminino , Auxiliares de Audição , Perda Auditiva Condutiva-Neurossensorial Mista/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Percepção da Fala , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implantation is mostly performed under general anaesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate cochlear implantation performed under local anaesthesia and sedation. METHOD: Twenty patients had a cochlear implant fitted under combined local anaesthesia (local anaesthesia group) and 41 patients had one fitted under general anaesthesia (general anaesthesia group) for bilateral profound hearing loss, from 2011 to 2014. Surgical duration, period of post-operative hospitalisation and early post-operative symptoms were compared. In the local anaesthesia group, operative symptoms reported during the surgery and by questionnaire were analysed. RESULTS: Mean surgical duration was significantly shorter in the local anaesthesia group: 87 versus 122 minutes (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the local anaesthesia and general anaesthesia groups regarding mean post-operative hospitalisation and early post-operative symptoms. Under local anaesthesia, patients had no particular symptoms in 60 per cent of cases. The remaining patients in this group experienced vertigo (10 per cent), pain (20 per cent) and pain-related movement (10 per cent) during the intervention. These symptoms can be controlled with symptomatic treatment. CONCLUSION: Combined local anaesthesia for cochlear implantation is a good alternative to general anaesthesia for co-operating patients.
Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Anestesia Local , Implante Coclear , Sedação Consciente , Perda Auditiva/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Implantes Cocleares , Feminino , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
CONCLUSION: The comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system presented in this paper is suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. If adopted as a universal reporting standard, as it was designed to be, it should prove highly beneficial by enabling future studies to quickly and easily compare the results of previous studies and meta-analyze their data. OBJECTIVES: To develop a comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. METHODS: The HEARRING group discussed and reviewed a number of different propositions of a HP classification systems and reviewed critical appraisals to develop a qualitative system in accordance with the prerequisites. RESULTS: The Hearing Preservation Classification System proposed herein fulfills the following necessary criteria: 1) classification is independent from users' initial hearing, 2) it is appropriate for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing, 3) it covers the whole range of pure tone average from 0 to 120 dB; 4) it is easy to use and easy to understand.
Assuntos
Audiometria de Tons Puros , Limiar Auditivo , Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Consenso , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe an optimized 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography (3D TR-CE-MRA) at 3T in diagnosing head and neck paragangliomas and assessing their morphology and relation to neighboring vessels. METHODS: In a prospective study, eight consecutive patients presenting cranial cervical masses suspected to be 10 paragangliomas were examined with 3D TR-CE-MRA at 3T. Two neuroradiologists evaluated the overall image quality, the presence of a paraganglioma, the maximum diameter, as well as the vessel invasion. RESULTS: In all of the cases, the overall image quality was scored as good. The tumors (n=10) were all visualized and localized. The mean maximum diameter was 32.7mm [range 7-80]. Vessel invasion was assessed as uncertain in one case and improbable in nine cases. CONCLUSION: 3D TR-CE-MRA at 3T associated with conventional sequences facilitates a comprehensive investigation of paragangliomas, thus providing the anatomical and functional information.
Assuntos
Angiografia Cerebral/métodos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Paraganglioma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Artérias/patologia , Angiografia Cerebral/instrumentação , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/irrigação sanguínea , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional/instrumentação , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética/instrumentação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tamanho do Órgão , Paraganglioma/irrigação sanguínea , Paraganglioma/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo , Veias/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Parapharyngeal space tumors are rare and usually benign. Their treatment is surgical and many approaches have been described. We report our experience in managing these neoplasms. Two points are developed more fully: the correlation between imaging and surgical observation and the reliability of the cervical approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of primary parapharyngeal space tumors treated at the Rennes University Hospital between 1992 and 2004 is presented. Nine patients were included, all treated surgically with a cervical approach without parotidectomy. RESULTS: Eight MR imaging and seven CT scans were done. Two retrostyloid tumors and six prestyloid tumors, all independent of the deep lobe of the parotid gland, were found. They were benign in all cases (five salivary tumors and four schwannomas). Two patients treated for a pleomorphic adenoma presented recurrence and were reoperated successfully. The average follow-up was 66 months. None of the patients died. Definitive postoperative complications occurred only for neurogenic tumors. CONCLUSION: The cervical approach is safe and allows the surgical excision of retrostyloid and prestyloid tumors, independent of the deep lobe of the parotid gland. Large tumor (8cm in our study) excision can be done with few complications. An attentive study of preoperative imaging is necessary to choose the best surgical approach.