A Bundled Payment Model for Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures: Defining an Episode of Care.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures are the most common fracture of childhood, occurring in ∼1 per 100 children annually. Given the high incidence of these fractures, we explored feasibility of a bundled payment model. We determined the total treatment costs for each child and identified components of fracture management that contributed to variations in cost. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all hospital and physician costs related to the treatment of closed distal radius fractures at a large academic children's hospital. We included all children age 2 to 15 years treated by an orthopaedic surgeon for an isolated closed distal radius fracture between 2013 and 2015. We compared total treatment costs by fracture management approach. We then estimated the contribution of each component of fracture management to total treatment costs using linear regression. RESULTS: We identified 5640 children meeting the inclusion criteria, of which 4602 (81.6%) received closed treatment without manipulation, 922 (16.3%) underwent closed reduction in the clinic, emergency department, or radiology procedure suite, and 116 (2.1%) underwent treatment in the operating room. The median cost for closed treatment without manipulation was $1390 [interquartile range (IQR) 1029 to 1801], compared with $4263 (IQR, 3740 to 4832) for closed reduction and $9389 (IQR, 8272 to 11,119) for closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (P<0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, fracture management approach and use of the operating room environment were the largest cost drivers (P<0.001, R=0.88). Closed reduction in the clinic or emergency department added $894 (95% confidence interval, 819-969) to treatment costs, while closed reduction in the operating room added $5568 (95% confidence interval, 5224-6297). Location of the initial clinical evaluation, number of radiographic imaging series obtained, and number of orthopaedic clinic visits also contributed to total costs. CONCLUSIONS: Closed pediatric distal radius fractures treated without manipulation show small variations in treatment costs, making them well suited for bundled payment. Bundled payments for these fractures could reduce costs by encouraging adoption of existing evidence-based practices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

Historical Patterns and Variation in Treatment of Injuries in NFL (National Football League) Players and NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) Division I Football Players.

We conducted a study to identify and contrast patterns in the treatment of common injuries that occur in National Football League (NFL) players and National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football players. Orthopedic team physicians for all 32 NFL and 119 NCAA Division I football teams were asked to complete a survey regarding demographics and preferred treatment of a variety of injuries encountered in football players. Responses were received from 31 (97%) of the 32 NFL and 111 (93%) of the 119 NCAA team physicians. Although patellar tendon autograft was the preferred graft choice for both groups of team physicians, the percentage of NCAA physicians who allowed return to football 6 months or less after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was significantly (P = .03) higher than that of NFL physicians. Prophylactic knee bracing, which may prevent medial collateral ligament injuries, was used at a significantly (P < .0001) higher rate by NCAA teams (89%) than by NFL teams (28%). Ketorolac injections were given by a significantly (P < .01) higher percentage of NFL teams (93%) than of NCAA teams (62%). Understanding the current trends in the management of these injuries is beneficial in designing studies that may help improve the treatment and prevention of injuries in football players.

Comparison of computerized and paper versions of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index.

BACKGROUND: The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) is commonly used in orthopedic research to assess the effect of a rotator cuff injury. Questions in the WORC are presented in a visual analog scale format, which requires patients to place a pencil mark along a 10-cm line indicating their responses. The purpose of our study was to determine if a computerized version of a visual analog scale requiring patients drag a cursor along a line was comparable to data collected using the standard paper version of the WORC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Administration of the WORC was randomized, with the first version given in the waiting room before the office visit, and the second immediately after the office visit, to ensure the participant's shoulder function had not significantly changed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with rotator cuff injury completed the paper and computerized versions of the WORC. There was no significant difference in mean scores for the WORC between the paper (1040.3) and computerized versions (1021.2, P = .488). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the 2 versions was 0.94. Similarly, there were no significant differences in scores between the subset of scores within the WORC (Physical Activity, Work, Sports, Lifestyle, and Emotion, P > .05), and each subset was highly correlated (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.80). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in scores for the WORC index when administered in a computerized format vs a paper format.