Normalized Subendocardial Myocardial Attenuation on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Postoperative Adverse Cardiovascular Events: Coronary CTA VISION Substudy.

BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in computed tomography myocardial perfusion has been associated with coronary artery disease and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We sought to investigate if subendocardial attenuation using coronary computed tomography angiography predicts MACE 30 days postelective noncardiac surgery. METHODS: Using a 17-segment model, coronary computed tomography angiography images were analyzed for subendocardial and transmural attenuation and the corresponding blood pool. The segment with the lowest subendocardial attenuation and transmural attenuation were normalized to the segment with the highest subendocardial and transmural attenuation, respectively (SUBnormalized, and TRANSnormalized, respectively). We evaluated the independent and incremental value of myocardial attenuation to predict the composite of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Of a total of 995 coronary CTA VISION (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography and Vascular Events in Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation Study) patients, 735 had available images and complete data for these analyses. Among these patients, 60 had MACE. Based on Revised Cardiovascular Risk Index, 257, 302, 138, and 38 patients had scores of 0, 1, 2, and ≥3, respectively. On coronary computed tomography angiography, 75 patients had normal coronary arteries, 297 patients had nonobstructive coronary artery disease, 264 patients had obstructive disease, and 99 patients had extensive obstructive coronary artery disease. SUBnormalized was an independent and incremental predictor of events in the model that included Revised Cardiovascular Risk Index and coronary artery disease severity. Compared with patients in the highest tertile of SUBnormalized, patients in the second and first tertiles had an increased hazards ratio for events (2.23 [95% CI, 1.091-4.551] and 2.36 [95% CI, 1.16-4.81], respectively). TRANSnormalized, as a continuous variable, was also found to be a predictor of MACE (P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that SUBnormalized and TRANSnormalized are independent and incremental predictors of MACE 30 days after elective noncardiac surgery. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01635309.

Comparison of intra and post-operative complication rates among surgical approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Various surgical approaches exist for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), but approach specific complication rates remain unknown. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare rates of common complications between surgical approaches. METHODS: Four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, AMED, Ovid Healthstar) were searched from inception to June 2019. Three pairs of reviewers were involved in determining eligibility, rating internal and external validity, and data extraction. Pooled estimates were generated using a random-effects model and relative risk (RR) was calculated for dislocation, intraoperative and early postoperative fracture, early infection, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), wound complication, and failure of implant ingrowth between four approaches (posterior, anterior, direct lateral, and anterolateral). RESULTS: Sixty-nine studies (n = 283,036) were included with nineteen randomized control trials, fourteen prospective cohort, and thirty-six retrospective cohort studies (included studies ranged from 1987 to 2019). When compared to the posterior approach, the risk for dislocation was significantly lower in the anterior (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.77, p < 0.01), anterolateral (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.77, p = 0.03) and lateral (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.96, p = 0.02). When compared to the posterior approach, we found higher risk of loosening in the anterolateral (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.59-2.25, p < 0.01) and lateral (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.44, p = 0.03). Overall, evidence was deemed very low and low-quality following GRADE assessment. CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal that the posterior approach was associated with a higher risk of dislocation (compared to the anterior, lateral, and anterolateral) but lower risk of loosening (compared to the lateral and anterolateral approach). However, the large number of cohorts and imprecision due to low sample size for most pooled comparisons was still insufficient to confidently conclude that one approach is superior to another. Each approach has its own strengths and weaknesses, and surgeons can use the approach they are most comfortable with.