Standing versus supine pelvic incidence in adult spinal deformity patients.

PURPOSE: Pelvic incidence (PI) is commonly used to determine sagittal alignment. Historically, PI was believed to be a fixed anatomic parameter. However, recent studies have suggested that there is positionally-dependent motion that occurs through the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) resulting in changes in PI. METHODS: We reviewed 100 consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients seen at our academic tertiary referral center. Two reviewers measured pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and lumbar lordosis (LL) on standing radiographs and scout computed tomography scans (CT). Unilateral, bilateral, or absent SIJ vacuum sign (VS) was determined using CTs. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients (42 M:44 F) were included with an average age of 64.1 years and BMI of 28.8 kg/m2. Standing PI was low (< 50°) in 35 patients (40.7%), average (50°-60°) in 22 (25.6%), and high (> 60°) in 29 (33.7%). Average and high PI patients had significant PI changes of 3.0° (p = 0.037) and 4.6° (p = 0.005), respectively. Bilateral SIJ VS was seen in 68 patients, unilateral VS in 9, and VS was absent in 9. The average change in PI between standing and supine was 2.1° in bilateral SIJ VS patients (p = 0.045), 2.2° in unilateral SIJ VS (p = 0.23), and - 0.1° in patients without SIJ VS (p = 0.93). The average absolute difference in PI between supine and standing was 5.5° ±5.5° (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a change in PI from supine to standing. In patients with high PI and bilateral VS on CT, the change from supine to standing is significant, perhaps representing instability of the SIJ.

Perioperative Management in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A successful reverse total shoulder arthroplasty requires careful preoperative planning and perioperative management. Preoperative comorbidity risks, perioperative pain management, and postoperative rehabilitation are all critical components of this arthroplasty. The current review examines available literature to guide the perioperative care of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patient. RECENT FINDINGS: One of the most important advances for shoulder arthroplasty in recent years has been heightened awareness of various modalities for perioperative pain management. A number of recent studies have focused on the options for regional blockade as a critical tool for postoperative pain relief and the use of either continuous interscalene blocks or single shot blocks are supported. Additional studies are necessary to define the best local anesthetic agent and delivery mechanism to provide appropriate pain relief with a low side effect profile. Management of the patient throughout the perioperative course is a critical component in achieving better patient outcomes delivering high quality patient care. An orthopedic surgery team focused on perioperative management is better positioned to decrease adverse events and improve patient outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.