Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Pharm ; 372(1-2): 147-53, 2009 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19429274

RESUMO

Here we demonstrate the use of a colloidal probe atomic force microscope (AFM) to compare the interactions between a model protein microsphere (insulin) and a set of common device polymers (polytetrafluoroethylene, polyethylene and polypropylene) with and without antistatic additive. For inhalation-based delivery devices the solid protein microspheres will interact with the device surfaces under ambient atmospheric conditions, and as such we studied the particle device interaction at a range of relative humidities. The results clearly discriminate between the five different polymer choices, and the impact of the antistatic additive. Although the mechanistic understanding is incomplete, it is evident that the polypropylene with antistatic additive gives consistent and relatively small interaction forces over the entire humidity range. The other polymer surfaces have humidity ranges where the pull-off forces are substantially greater. At 80% relative humidity, the insulin-polymer adhesion forces were similar for all the polymers probably due to the dominance of static charge mitigation and surface hydration effects. Overall, direct measurement of adhesion forces between pharmaceutical microspheres and container substrates can help direct rational choice of plastics/coatings for medical devices.


Assuntos
Insulina/química , Microesferas , Polímeros/química , Administração por Inalação , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Polímeros/administração & dosagem , Propriedades de Superfície
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...