Optimal timing for plastic surgical procedures for common congenital anomalies: A review.

Apart from listening to the cry of a healthy newborn, it is the declaration by the attending paediatrician in the labour room that the child is normal which brings utmost joy to parents. The global incidence of children born with congenital anomalies has been reported to be 3%-6% with more than 90% of these occurring in low- and middle-income group countries. The exact percentages/total numbers of children requiring surgical treatment cannot be estimated for several reasons. These children are operated under several surgical disciplines, viz, paediatric-, plastic reconstructive, neuro-, cardiothoracic-, orthopaedic surgery etc. These conditions may be life-threatening, e.g., trachea-oesophageal fistula, critical pulmonary stenosis, etc. and require immediate surgical intervention. Some, e.g., hydrocephalus, may need intervention as soon as the patient is fit for surgery. Some, e.g., patent ductus arteriosus need 'wait and watch' policy up to a certain age in the hope of spontaneous recovery. Another extremely important category is that of patients where the operative intervention is done based on their age. Almost all the congenital anomalies coming under care of a plastic surgeon are operated as elective surgery (many as multiple stages of correction) at appropriate ages. There are advantages and disadvantages of intervention at different ages. In this article, we present a review of optimal timings, along with reasoning, for surgery of many of the common congenital anomalies which are treated by plastic surgeons. Obstetricians, paediatricians and general practitioners/family physicians, who most often are the first ones to come across such children, must know to guide the parents appropriately and convincingly impress upon the them as to why their child should not be operated immediately and also the consequences of too soon or too late.

Nasal Measurements in Indian Population of North-East Region: Angular Parameters with Literature Review.

Background: Just like linear nasal parameters, angular nasal parameters form the basis of any rhinoplasty, especially in various ethnic groups to maintain the specific racial characteristics while creating an aesthetic nose. The objective of this study was to measure and study the outcomes of angular nasal parameters in north-east Indians and to contrast them with available literature on Oriental, Caucasian and Indian population in general. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in 150 young adults from north-east region of India. Surface landmarks were marked, and standard photographs were taken. Nine angular parameters were measured from the left lateral and basal view photographs of the face using computer software. Data were analysed by Student's 't'-test for parametric data and Mann-Whitney U-test for non-parametric data using SPSS v.25. Results: All the angular measurements were found to be greater in females except nasofacial angle, columella tip angle and interaxial angle. Differences in nasofrontal angle, columella labial angle, nasofacial angle and columella tip angle between males and females were statistically significant. Nasofrontal and columella labial angles were more acute in the study population compared to Caucasians, Orientals and other Indians while nasofacial, interaxial and interalar angles were larger. Conclusion: The north-east Indian nose is dissimilar to that of rest of the country as well as that of Caucasians and Orientals with respect to angular parameters.

Protective Diversion Stoma in Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: With the establishment of the oncological safety and due to the potential of low anterior resection (LAR) with sphincter salvage in improving the quality of life of patients with low and mid rectal cancers, it has become a popular treatment modality. A potential complication of the procedure is anastomotic dehiscence which results in a significant increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the role of protective diversion stoma with no stoma in LAR of the rectum was performed in PubMed. The effect size for dichotomous and continuous data was displayed as relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD), respectively, with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. A fixed effect or random effects model was used to pool the data according to the result of a statistical heterogeneity test. RESULTS: Five RCTs were identified and included in the analysis. These yielded 390 patients who had undergone a protective diversion ileostomy at the time of the surgery (LAR) and 378 who had not, resulting in a total of 768 patients, all of whom were included in the meta-analysis. The fashioning of an ileostomy significantly decreased the anastomotic leak (AL) rates (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.51, p < 0.000) and the reoperation rates (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.45, p < 0.000). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found that a protective diversion ileostomy in LAR for rectal cancer decreases the AL rates by one third and the reoperation rates by one fourth. Thus, we conclude that fashioning such a stoma is beneficial.

Milky Mesentery: Acute Abdomen with Chylous Ascites.

BACKGROUND: Clinical presentations of intestinal lymphangiectasia include pitting edema, chylous ascites, pleural effusion, diarrhea, malabsorption and intestinal obstruction. CASE CHARACTERISTICS: An 8-year-old male child presented to the emergency department with clinical features of peritonitis, raising suspicion of appendicular or small bowel perforation. INTERVENTION/OUTCOME: Diagnosis of chylous ascites with primary intestinal lymphangiectasia made on laparotomy. MESSAGE: Acute peritonitis may be a presentation of primary intestinal lymphangiectasia and chylous ascites.

The Role of Surgery in Palliative Care of Cancer: A Review.

It is often said 'what cannot be cured has to be endured'. However, the endurance of suffering can at least be minimized by a surgeon. Traditionally, healthcare research has mainly centered over treatment approaches which increased the longevity of patients with incurable cancer. However, in addition, the focus is now also on the role of surgical intervention in palliation of symptoms of these patients, in order to provide them with comfort and dignity along with end-of-life medical care. Any surgical procedure undertaken to relieve symptoms and to enhance quality of life, with little or no bearing on overall survival of the patient, constitute a part of 'Palliative Surgery'. Surgery comprises a potentially viable option of palliation. However, it should not prove to be an unfavorable treatment to the patients. An effective and quality palliative surgery requires assessment of optimal timing and selection of suitable operative procedure(s) with a minimal perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Palliative Surgery for Metastatic Fungating Phyllodes Tumors: A Series of Two Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Local treatment of metastatic cystosarcoma phyllodes is classically viewed with skepticism because it does not provide survival benefit. When these advanced tumors ulcerate, they reduce quality of life dramatically because of associated pain, infection, malodor, massive discharge, and bleeding. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Two patients with metastatic cystosarcoma phyllodes presented to our hospital with recurrent disease featuring foul-smelling, ulcerated chest wall masses that caused physical pain and social exclusion. The first patient underwent radical chest wall resection with pedicled lattisimus dorsi flap reconstruction. The second patient underwent wide local excision with split-thickness skin grafting. There was significant improvement in the quality of life for these patients after the operations. DISCUSSION: Though both patients finally succumbed to progressive metastatic disease, palliative resection allowed them to have good social and family support to the end. Palliative surgery plays an important role in alleviating suffering of patients with metastatic fungating cystosarcoma phyllodes and has the potential to improve their quality of life significantly.

Preoperative therapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive malignancy associated with dismal treatment outcomes. Presence of two distinct histopathological types distinguishes it from other gastrointestinal tract malignancies. Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment in locally advanced esophageal cancer (T2 or greater or node positive); however, a high rate of disease recurrence (systemic and loco-regional) and poor survival justifies a continued search for optimal therapy. Various combinations of multimodality treatment (preoperative/perioperative, or postoperative; radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy) are being explored to lower disease recurrence and improve survival. Preoperative therapy followed by surgery is presently considered the standard of care in resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer as postoperative treatment may not be feasible for all the patients due to the morbidity of esophagectomy and prolonged recovery time limiting the tolerance of patient. There are wide variations in the preoperative therapy practiced across the centres depending upon the institutional practices, availability of facilities and personal experiences. There is paucity of literature to standardize the preoperative therapy. Broadly, chemoradiotherapy is the preferred neo-adjuvant modality in western countries whereas chemotherapy alone is considered optimal in the far East. The present review highlights the significant studies to assist in opting for the best evidence based preoperative therapy (radiotherapy, chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) for locally advanced esophageal cancer.