Objective Methodology to Assess Meaningful Research Productivity by Orthopaedic Residency Departments: Validation Against Widely Distributed Ranking Metrics and Published Surrogates.

The mission of any academic orthopaedic training program can be divided into 3 general areas of focus: clinical care, academic performance, and research. Clinical care is evaluated on clinical volume, patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and becoming increasingly focused on data-driven quality metrics. Academic performance of a department can be used to motivate individual surgeons, but objective measures are used to define a residency program. Annual in-service examinations serve as a marker of resident knowledge base, and board pass rates are clearly scrutinized. Research productivity, however, has proven harder to objectively quantify. In an effort to improve transparency and better account for conflicts of interest, bias, and self-citation, multiple bibliometric measures have been developed. Rather than using individuals' research productivity as a surrogate for departmental research, we sought to establish an objective methodology to better assess a residency program's ability to conduct meaningful research. In this study, we describe a process to assess the number and quality of publications produced by an orthopaedic residency department. This would allow chairmen and program directors to benchmark their current production and make measurable goals for future research investment. The main goal of the benchmarking system is to create an "h-index" for residency programs. To do this, we needed to create a list of relevant articles in the orthopaedic literature. We used the Journal Citation Reports. This publication lists all orthopaedic journals that are given an impact factor rating every year. When we accessed the Journal Citation Reports database, there were 72 journals included in the orthopaedic literature section. To ensure only relevant, impactful journals were included, we selected journals with an impact factor greater than 0.95 and an Eigenfactor Score greater than 0.00095. After excluding journals not meeting these criteria, we were left with 45 journals. We performed a Scopus search over a 10-year period of these journals and created a database of articles and their affiliated institutions. We performed several iterations of this to maximize the capture of articles attributed to institutions with multiple names. Based off of this extensive database, we were able to analyze all allopathic US residency programs based on their quality research productivity. We believe this as a novel methodology to create a system by which residency program chairmen and directors can assess progress over time and accurate comparison with other programs.

Examining long-term outcomes of bladder exstrophy: a 20-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To examine long-term quality-of-life, urinary continence and sexual function outcomes in patients diagnosed with bladder exstrophy (BE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 65 patients with BE and follow-up of at least 20 years were identified. After informed consent for inclusion in the study, the patients were asked to complete three validated questionnaires, the Short-Form 36 quality-of-life questionnaire (SF-36), the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), to assess quality of life, perceived urinary continence and sexual function. RESULTS: In all, 21 patients responded to the questionnaires, yielding a 32% response rate. High scores in each of the eight dimensions of the SF-36 reflected a positive perception of quality of life by respondents; calculated scores were compared with those of a normal control group. The only significant difference found between the groups was that the study population perceived their general health to be poorer than those in the control group. High scores on the ICIQ indicate high levels of subjective incontinence in patients, with scores ranging from 0 to 21. Reporting scores of 0 (continent), 12/21 patients perceived their continence to be normal, 9/21 patients had scores >2 (mild), with one patient scoring a 16, and 11 (severe incontinence), patients reported no identifiable leakage during normal activities. There was a 29% response rate for the IIEF (15 patients completed this). IIEF scores were broken down into five dimensions and mean scores were calculated. The mean scores showed mild to moderate dysfunction in each category, including overall satisfaction with sexual experience. CONCLUSIONS: The patient-reported quality of life in patients with BE was normal in all dimensions, with the exception of perception of general health. Half of the patients reported normal continence and had no complaints of urinary leakage. Sexual function in males was significantly affected across all dimensions, with mild to moderate dysfunction.

Radial forearm free flap phalloplasty for penile inadequacy in patients with exstrophy.

PURPOSE: Male patients with bladder and cloacal exstrophy are born with demure genitalia and often desire phalloplasty during late adolescence or early adulthood. Radial forearm free flap phalloplasty was used successfully for congenital aphallia in a few small series. We present a series of patients treated with phalloplasty using a radial forearm free flap after the repair of bladder and cloacal exstrophy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 10 patients who underwent radial forearm free flap phalloplasty between 2007 and 2012. Indications for phalloplasty were classic bladder exstrophy in 8 cases and cloacal exstrophy in 2. Nine patients underwent prior urinary diversion and 1 underwent urethroplasty at phalloplasty. In each case we reviewed the details of prior exstrophy repair, flap size, donor and recipient vessels, complications, need for subsequent surgeries and self-reported sensation. RESULTS: The graft survived in all 10 patients. Short-term complications requiring surgical intervention developed in 2 patients. Five patients subsequently underwent placement of a penile prosthesis and 2 devices were removed secondary to erosion. All 10 patients reported protective sensation and erogenous sensation with ability to achieve orgasm at last followup. CONCLUSIONS: Radial forearm free flap phalloplasty results in a sensate, cosmetic neophallus. No patient had long-term complications related to phalloplasty but complications related to penile prostheses continue to be a challenging aspect of phalloplasty. The long-term results of the forearm free flap are encouraging in this series of patients with bladder and cloacal exstrophy who desired phalloplasty.