The Extent and Scope of Prosthodontic Practice in Iowa.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this questionnaire was to ask general dentists in private practice in the state of Iowa about the extent and scope of their prosthodontic practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 22-item questionnaire was developed and tested on 5 general dentists. The Iowa Dental Association agreed to electronically distribute the survey to all general practice dentists in their database. After three rounds, a total of 289 responses were received from the 996 general dentists in the database. RESULTS: The average age of the respondents was 50.3 ± 13.2 years (range 28 to 78 years), and 56.3% were in solo practice. The respondents stated that 68.1% had made at least one set of complete dentures and 88.9% had made a removable partial denture (RPD) in the last 3 months, while 76.4% had restored a least one implant in the last 3 months and 11.6% had surgically placed one. Nearly 20% of the respondents had a digital impression scanner in their office. There was a statistically significant difference between the dentists who had made complete dentures in the past 3 months and those who had not with regard to age, gender, and years in practice (p < 0.05 for all instances). No significant difference was found between the general dentists who had made an RPD in the past 3 months and those who had not. Compared to their counterparts, general dentists who had an AEGD or GPR training (p = 0.0312), whose primary practices were in cities of 50,000+ (p = 0.0065), or had a digital scanner (p = 0.0062) and a CAD/CAM milling machine (p = 0.0504) in their office were more likely to have restored an implant in the last 3 months. Furthermore, the general dentists who had surgically placed an implant in the last 3 months were more likely to be male (p = 0.0301) or have a digital impression scanner (p < 0.0001) and/or a CAD/CAM milling machine (p = 0.0007) in their office. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of general dentists in this survey are still making complete and partial removable dentures, and a majority is using implants, while only a minority is surgically placing them. PRACTICAL  IMPLICATIONS: Although Iowa general dentists are carrying out sophisticated procedures such as implant placement and restoring implants, as well as using digital technology, there is still a need for removable prosthodontic services in their practices. Therefore, these skills will still need to be taught in dental school.

Curriculum content in geriatric dentistry in USA dental schools.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to re-examine the teaching of geriatric dentistry in the USA dental schools, to identify curriculum content and compare the findings to previous reports. METHODS: All dental schools in the United States were contacted via email with a questionnaire to assess the teaching of geriatric dentistry. Non-responding schools were sent a minimum of three reminder emails to complete the survey. A statistical analysis was performed. Descriptive statistics were conducted to profile the variables of interest. Bivariate analysis was performed to explore if any of the variables were related using Fisher's exact test, non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Fifty-six of the 67 dental schools completed the questionnaire. Geriatric dentistry was taught in all dental schools; for 92.8%, the course was compulsory. We found that 62.5% were teaching it as an independent course, 25% as an organised series of lectures and 8.9% as occasional lectures in parts of other courses. Clinically, 84.2% have some form of compulsory education in geriatric dentistry. Public schools were marginally associated with an increased interest in expanding the geriatric dentistry curriculum (P = .078). No differences were found between these variables and school location. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric dentistry is now required in 92.8% of dental schools. The teaching of traditional topics has not changed much; however, the number of gerontological topics has increased. Clinical teaching needs to be expanded, as in only 57.1% of schools was it a requirement. The ageing imperative will require research to determine the impact of teaching on services to the geriatric community.

Postdoctoral Teaching of Geriatric Dentistry in U.S. Dental Schools.

The aim of this study was to determine the number and size of postdoctoral teaching programs in geriatric dentistry in U.S. dental schools and other health professions educational institutions and those programs with Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) funding. In 2015, all 67 U.S. dental schools were contacted via email with a questionnaire to ask if they had a postdoctoral program in geriatric dentistry; if they did, they were asked to report the length and size of the program. Directors of all 16 HRSA-funded geriatric fellowships were also invited to participate in the survey. Fifty-six of the 67 (83.6%) dental schools and 15 of the 16 (93.8%) HRSA-funded programs completed the questionnaire. Postdoctoral geriatric dentistry programs were reported in 12 dental schools and six medical institutions, although only six programs were currently accepting fellows. The length of the programs was 12-36 months. The maximum number of residents in any program was ten. The oldest program was in Minnesota; it began in 1981. The newest program was beginning in 2017 at Boston University as a revised version of its previous HRSA-funded program. The loss of HRSA funding has had a major negative impact on the number of training programs. Future research is needed to determine how the loss of HRSA-funded programs has affected the availability of educators in geriatric dentistry for dental schools and the services provided to the geriatric community.

Predoctoral Teaching of Geriatric Dentistry in U.S. Dental Schools.

The aim of this study was to assess the current teaching of geriatric dentistry in U.S. dental schools and compare the findings to previous reports. Academic deans at all 67 U.S. dental schools were contacted in November 2015 via email, asking them to complete a questionnaire about the teaching of geriatric dentistry or gerodontology at their institution. Questionnaires were received from 56 of the 67 schools (84% response rate). The results showed that geriatric dentistry was taught in all responding schools; for 92.8% of the respondents, the instruction was compulsory. Among the responding schools, 62.5% were teaching it as an independent course, 25% as an organized series of lectures, and 8.9% as occasional lectures in parts of other courses. In addition, 57.1% had some form of compulsory clinical education in geriatric dentistry. Public schools, as opposed to private schools, were marginally associated with an increased interest in expanding geriatric dentistry teaching (p=0.078). No differences were found between any teaching variables and school location. This study found that the form of education in geriatric dentistry in U.S. dental schools differed in many ways, but the teaching of geriatric dentistry had increased among all respondents and had been increasing for over 30 years. Future research is needed to determine the impact of this teaching on services to the geriatric community.

NaF rinse and dentifrice concentrations on enamel lesion demineralization.

PURPOSE: To compare the in vitro effectiveness of two mouthrinses containing different concentrations of NaF to reduce enamel lesion demineralization. METHODS: Nine extracted caries-free molars were selected and cleaned. The teeth were painted with acid resistant varnish, leaving a 1 mm × 4 mm window exposed. The teeth were cycled in a demineralizing solution at pH 4.5 for a total for 96 hours. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally through the unpainted window using a hard-tissue microtome, producing 96 sections. The sections were measured and photographed under polarized light microscopy using water and Thoulet's 1.47 as imbibing mediums. Six treatment groups were randomly created: (A) water control group, (B) 0.05% rinse group once a day (C) 0.02% rinse group twice a day, (D) 1,500 ppm paste group used twice a day, (E) combination group containing 0.05% rinse once a day, and 1,500 ppm paste twice a day, and (F) combination group containing 0.02% rinse and 1,500 ppm paste twice a day. A 10-day cycling protocol was carried out. All sections were then re-measured and re-photographed. A statistical analysis was performed to detect any differences between pre- and post-treatment groups. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in lesion depth between the water control group and the 1,500 ppm paste group as well as the 0.05% rinse in combination with 1,500 ppm paste group (P= 0.0184). No statistically significant differences were found between the control group and any other groups. A statistically significant difference was found in lesion area between the two rinse groups alone and the 1,500 ppm paste group, as well as the 0.05% rinse in combination with the 1,500 ppm paste group (P= 0.0002). An analysis of the results suggested that both rinse concentrations performed equally well in reducing lesion demineralization when used alone. However, only the 0.05% rinse used in combination with 1,500 ppm paste decreased lesion demineralization as compared to the water control group, and was equally as effective as the 1,500 ppm paste alone. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was found that a fluoride containing dentifrice (1,500 ppm) and a combination of a fluoride containing dentifrice (1,500 ppm) and a 0.05% (210 ppm) fluoride rinse were more effective at reducing demineralization of enamel lesions than sodium fluoride rinses at concentrations of 0.02% and 0.05% alone or the combination of 0.02% NaF rinse with fluoride toothpaste.

In vitro assessment of 3 dentifrices containing fluoride in preventing demineralization of overdenture abutments and root surfaces.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Caries development under overdentures has been a continuing problem and requires the daily use of fluoride to prevent demineralization. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of dentifrices containing tricalcium phosphate or calcium phosphosilicate in combination with fluoride to prevent the demineralization of overdenture abutments and root surfaces. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 56 caries-free extracted teeth were prepared as overdenture abutments. The teeth were painted with acid-resistant varnish, leaving one 1×4-mm window on occlusal and root surfaces. The teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups: a control group treated with distilled/deionized water only, a group treated with ClinPro 5000, a group treated with ReNew, and a group treated with Prevident 5000 gel. Each tooth was subjected to a demineralizing/remineralizing cycling protocol for 12 days with the appropriate treatment products. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally through both windows. Photomicrographs were made of 3 representative sections from each tooth. A representative section was defined as one that included both windows and was cut from the part of the tooth that had the flattest surface to reduce the edge effect. The depths of the lesions were measured on representative sections from each group. A 1-way MANOVA and a 1-way ANOVA with the post hoc Tukey-Kramer test were used to evaluate the treatment effects on the criterion variables (α=.05). RESULTS: The total lesion depths of the control teeth on the occlusal surface were not statistically significantly deeper than for the 3 dentifrices (P=.7705). However, all 3 dentifrices had narrower cavitation depths than the control (mean cavitation band depth, 43.59 [ReNew] versus 37.99 [Prevident 5000 gel] versus 36.70 [ClinPro 5000] versus 246.86 [control]) (P<.001). The mean remineralization band depth for ClinPro 5000 was significantly greater than for the other 2 treatment groups (118.03 [ClinPro 5000] versus 107.80 [ReNew] versus 102.28 [Prevident 5000 gel]) (P<.001). On root surfaces, the total lesion depth for the control group was statistically significantly deeper than for the 3 dentifrices (mean total lesion depth, 150.31 [control] versus 82.05 [ReNew] versus 68.10 [ClinPro 5000] versus 56.97 [Prevident 5000 gel]) (P<.001). The data indicated that teeth treated with Prevident 5000 gel had the shallowest total lesion depth and were statistically significantly different from those treated with ReNew and ClinPro 5000. Moreover, teeth treated with ReNew were found to have the largest remineralization band depth, which was statistically significantly different compared with ClinPro 5000 and Prevident 5000 gel (mean remineralization band depth, 49.66 [ReNew] versus 36.14 [ClinPro 5000] versus 23.27 [Prevident 5000 gel]) (P<.001), but no difference was found in cavitation depth of the root lesions between the 3 dentifrices. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of tricalcium phosphate or calcium phosphosilicate to fluoride-containing dentifrices (5000 ppm) does not significantly improve their ability to prevent demineralization of the cut dentin surface of overdenture abutments. However, on root surfaces, ReNew, which contains calcium phosphosilicate, was found to improve remineralization of the lesions compared with Prevident 5000 gel or ClinPro 5000.