RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The mini-fluid challenge (MFC), which assesses the change in stroke volume index (SVI) following the administration of 100 mL of crystalloids, and the short-time low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) challenge (SLPC), which evaluates the temporary reduction in SVI due to a PEEP increment, are two functional hemodynamic tests used to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. However, SLPC has not been assessed in patients undergoing abdominal surgery, and there is no study comparing these two methods during laparotomy. Therefore, we aimed to compare the SLPC and MFC in patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients received a standard hemodynamic management. The study protocol evaluated the percentage change in SVI following the application of an additional 5 cmH2O PEEP (SVIΔ%-SLPC) and the infusion of 100 mL crystalloid (SVIΔ%-MFC). Challenges that resulted in an increase of more than 15% in SVI after the 500 ml of fluid loading were classified as positive challenges (PC). Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC AUCs) were used for the comparison of the methods. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients completed the study with 94 challenges. Fifty-five (58.5%) of them were PCs. The ROC AUC of SVIΔ%-MFC was observed to be significantly higher than that of SVIΔ%-SLPC (0.97 vs. 0.64, p < 0.001). The best cut-off value for SVIΔ%-MFC was 5.6%. If we had stopped the bolus fluid administration when SVIΔ%-MFC ≤ 5% was observed (lower limit of the gray zone), we would have postponed the fluid loading in 35 (89.7%) of 39 negative challenges. The amount of fluid deferred would have corresponded to up to 40% of the total fluid given. CONCLUSIONS: SVIΔ%-MFC predicts fluid responsiveness with high diagnostic performance and is better than SVIΔ%-SLPC in patients undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy. Additionally, the use of SVIΔ%-MFC has the potential to defer up to 40% of the total fluid given. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT05419570.
