Factors associated with conversion to open reduction of type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures in children.

Background: The US News and World report utilizes the number of supracondylar humerus fractures treated in an open procedure, excluding open fractures and vascular exploration, as a metric in assessing Pediatric Orthopedic trauma care. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that increase the likelihood of a patient needing open reduction for Gartland Type 3 SCH fractures. Methods: All pediatric patients who underwent surgical management of closed, Type 3 SCH fractures at our Pediatric Level 1 Trauma Center between 2011 and 2017 were considered for inclusion. Patient age greater than 16 years, patients with closed physes and open fractures were excluded. Electronic medical records and radiographic imaging were reviewed. Student's t- and chi-squared tests were used, and logistic regression was performed comparing closed v open reduction. Results: 362 subjects were included in this study. 318/362 (87.8%) were treated with closed reduction. 44/362 (12.2%) required open reduction. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, BMI, concomitant ipsilateral extremity fractures, Type 4 unstable fracture or patients that underwent hospital transfer. The mechanisms of injury with the greatest percentage requiring open reduction were fall from furniture and trampoline. Of those patients that underwent open reduction, 65.9% had posterolateral displacement of the fracture. Those with displacement >4 mm had 3.14 higher odds of requiring an open reduction (p = 0.002). The anterior spike fracture pattern had the highest rate of failed closed reduction of 66.7%. Of those patients that had an open reduction, 13/44 (29.5%) had a neuropraxia and 5/44 (11.4%) had vascular compromise. Those with neuropraxia had 3.26 higher odds of requiring an open reduction (p = 0.005). Time to operating room was significantly shorter in patients that underwent open reduction (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our rate of open reduction for Type 3 SCH fractures, 12.2%, is consistent with previously described rates. Posterolateral displacement of fractures, displacement >4 mm, fractures with an anterior spike and fractures associated with neurovascular compromise are more likely to undergo open reduction. Transfer status, BMI and patient age were not associated with open reduction. Open reduction was associated with shorter time to the operating room, likely representing the urgent care of significantly displaced fractures associated with neurovascular compromise. Level of evidence: Level III.

Perioperative Interventions to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Review.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) contribute to increased health care costs and morbidity after procedures as well as prolonged length of stay. Perioperative personnel can use a variety of interventions to help reduce SSI incidence; however, all strategies are not effective for all patients (eg, antibiotic prophylaxis). Results of randomized controlled trials show that some SSI reduction strategies are generally effective, including preoperative skin antisepsis with an alcohol-based agent, closing surgical wounds with triclosan-coated suture, and applying a negative pressure wound therapy device to open and closed wounds. Study results do not show that irrigating clean wounds with crystalloid solutions containing antibiotics or routinely using plastic drapes with or without impregnated iodophor or silver nylon-impregnated dressings significantly reduces SSI incidence. Perioperative leaders should support the implementation of strategies to prevent SSIs and work with interdisciplinary team members to develop an SSI prevention bundle that will meet the needs of their patients.

Shared decision-making during surgical consultation for gallstones at a safety-net hospital.

BACKGROUND: Understanding patient perspectives regarding shared decision-making is crucial to providing informed, patient-centered care. Little is known about perceptions of vulnerable patients regarding shared decision-making during surgical consultation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a validated tool reflects perceptions of shared decision-making accurately among patients seeking surgical consultation for gallstones at a safety-net hospital. METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted in a sample of adult patients with gallstones evaluated at a safety-net surgery clinic between May to July 2016. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after their initial surgical consultation and analyzed for emerging themes. Patients were administered the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and Autonomy Preference Scale. Univariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with shared decision-making and to compare the results of the surveys to those of the interviews. RESULTS: The majority of patients (N = 30) were female (90%), Hispanic (80%), Spanish-speaking (70%), and middle-aged (45.7 ± 16 years). The proportion of patients who perceived shared decision-making was greater in the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire versus the interviews (83% vs 27%, P < .01). Age, sex, race/ethnicity, primary language, diagnosis, Autonomy Preference Scale score, and decision for operation was not associated with shared decision-making. Contributory factors to this discordance include patient unfamiliarity with shared decision-making, deference to surgeon authority, lack of discussion about different treatments, and confusion between aligned versus shared decisions. CONCLUSION: Available questionnaires may overestimate shared decision-making in vulnerable patients suggesting the need for alternative or modifications to existing methods. Furthermore, such metrics should be assessed for correlation with patient-reported outcomes, such as satisfaction with decisions and health status.