Effectiveness of generic direct-acting agents for the treatment of hepatitis C: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of generic direct-acting agents and brand-name medicines for treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched online databases for studies that reported sustained virological responses 12 weeks after the end of HCV treatment with generic direct-acting agents. We derived pooled proportions of treated patients with a sustained virological response from intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. In addition, we calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) of a sustained virological response brand-name versus generic direct-acting agents using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird) from the data available. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. FINDINGS: We identified 19 studies involving a total of 57 433 individuals from eight territories or regions. The pooled overall proportions of patients with a sustained virological response were 98% (95% confidence interval, CI: 97-99; 18 studies; I2 = 94.1%) in per-protocol analyses and 96% (95% CI: 93-98; 8 studies; I2 = 68.1%) in intention-to-treat analyses. The likelihood of a sustained virological response with brand-name medicines was similar to that with generic direct-acting agents (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.98-1.02; I2 = 0.0%). The likelihood of a sustained virological response was significantly higher in patients without than with cirrhosis (RR:1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06; 7 studies) but was not significantly affected by either previous treatment (3 studies) or human immunodeficiency virus coinfection (3 studies). CONCLUSION: Generic direct-acting agents are highly effective for treating hepatitis C. Generic agents should be considered in resource-constrained settings for decreasing the burden of liver disease in HCV-infected patients.

Effectiveness of direct-acting agents for hepatitis C and liver stiffness changing after sustained virological response.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Few studies have evaluated sustained virological response (SVR) rates by direct-acting agents (DAAs) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) changing post-SVR in limited-resource settings. We aimed to describe the effectiveness of DAAs for hepatitis C virus treatment and to assess the changing of LSM post-SVR. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data of consecutive hepatitis C virus-infected patients treated by DAAs from 2015 to 2017 in two tertiary centers in Brazil. SVR rates were reported by intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. LSM by transient elastography performed before treatment and post-SVR was compared, and logistic regression models were performed. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-one patients (63% female, 62 years [55-68], 89% genotype 1, 8% HIV co-infected, and 64% with cirrhosis) were included. Most patients were treated by sofosbuvir/daclatasvir ± ribavirin (74%) and sofosbuvir/simeprevir ± ribavirin (21%). SVR rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 94.6% (92.7-96.1) and 97.8% (96.4-98.7) for intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively. The leading adverse event was anemia (9.6% [95% CI 7.6-12.1]). Pretreatment and post-SVR12 LSM were available in 400 patients. LSM had significantly decreased after SVR (13.6 kPa [interquartile range, 10.0-21.6] vs 10.2 kPa [7.0-17.6], P < 0.001). A total of 167 patients (42%) decreased at least 30% of LSM post-SVR. The absence of type 2 diabetes (odds ratio = 1.52 [95% CI 1.05-2.21], P = 0.028) and presence of platelet count ≥ 150 × 109 /mm3 (odds ratio = 1.75 [1.23-2.50], P = 0.002) were independently associated with a significant LSM regression (≥ 30%) post-SVR. CONCLUSION: DAAs were highly effective and safe, and LSM significantly decreased after SVR in a real-life cohort in Brazil. The absence of type 2 diabetes and presence of high platelet count were independently associated with LSM decrease post-SVR.