A three-decade review of thermal injuries among the elderly at a regional burn centre.

AIM: To review trends in incidence and treatment of thermal injuries among the elderly. METHOD: A 3-year retrospective review of medical records of people aged 65 years and older admitted to our burn centre over July 2003-June 2006. RESULTS: Elderly people with burns continued to have significant comorbidities. They were often burned because they were inappropriately trying to live alone. Thus discharge was often complicated. CONCLUSIONS: At our burn centre, survival among elderly people with burns has increased, probably as a result of more sophisticated medical, surgical and nursing care, as well as more extensive rehabilitation.

Results of a protocol of transfusion threshold and surgical technique on transfusion requirements in burn patients.

INTRODUCTION: Blood loss and high rates of transfusion in burn centers remains an area of ongoing concern. Blood use brings the risk of infection, adverse reaction, and immunosuppression. METHODS: A protocol to reduce blood loss and blood use was implemented. Analysis included 3-year periods before and after institution of the protocol. All patients were transfused for a hemoglobin below 8.0 gm/dL. RESULTS: Operations per admission did not change during the two time periods (0.78 in each). Overall units transfused per operation decreased from 1.56+/-0.06 to 1.25+/-0.14 units after instituting the protocol (p<0.05). Also, units transfused per admission decreased from 1.21+/-0.15 to 0.96+/-0.06 units of blood (p<0.05). This was noticed particularly in burns of less than 20% surface area, declining from 386 to 46 units after protocol institution, from 0.37 to 0.04 units per admission, and from 0.79 to 0.08 units per operation in this group of smallest burns. There was no change noted in the larger burns. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a defined protocol of hemostasis, technique, and transfusion trigger should be implemented in the process of burn excision and grafting. This will help especially those patients with the smallest burns, essentially eliminating transfusion need in that group.

A prospective, randomized evaluation of intra-abdominal pressures with crystalloid and colloid resuscitation in burn patients.

BACKGROUND: The volume of resuscitation in burn patients has been shown to correlate with intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Limiting volume may reduce consequences of IAP and abdominal compartment syndrome. Colloid resuscitation has been previously shown to limit the volume required initially after burn. METHODS: Thirty-one patients were prospectively followed. Inclusion criteria were a burn of 25% total body surface area with inhalation injury or 40% total body surface area without. Patients received crystalloid (Parkland formula) or plasma resuscitation. IAP was measured by means of urinary bladder transduction. RESULTS: Mean age, area of burn, and baseline IAP were not different. Urine output was maintained. There was a greater increase in IAP with crystalloid (26.5 vs. 10.6 mmHg, p < 0.0001). Two patients in the plasma group developed IAP greater than 25 mmHg; only one patient in the crystalloid group maintained IAP less than 25 mmHg. More fluid volume was required with crystalloid resuscitation, 0.26 L/kg, versus 0.21 L/kg (p < 0.005). Correlation was seen in both groups between volume of fluid and IAP (crystalloid, r = 0.351; plasma, r = 0.657; all patients, r = 0.621). CONCLUSION: Plasma-resuscitated patients maintained an IAP below the threshold of complications of intra-abdominal hypertension. This appears to be a direct result of the decrease in volume required. Lower fluid volume regimens should be given consideration as the incidence and consequences of intra-abdominal hypertension in burn patients continue to be defined.

The use of tourniquets in the excision of unexsanguinated extremity burn wounds.

PURPOSE: Tangential excision of burns is complicated by blood loss. Tourniquet use decreases blood loss, but adequacy of excision has been questioned. An attempt was made to assess the value of not exsanguinating the limb prior to tourniquet inflation to improve visualization of bleeding points and subsequent engraftment. METHODS: Eleven excisions of bilateral extremity wounds were performed. One limb was excised without the benefit of a tourniquet, the other with tourniquet but without exsanguination. Tangential excision was performed, hemostasis achieved, and blood loss quantified. Engraftment of skin was assessed at first dressing change and at initial follow-up after discharge. RESULTS: Area of burn was the same, 4.8% with tourniquet, 5.1% without (P=0.38). Overall blood loss was less with tourniquet control, 100-259 cm(3) (P=0.002); as was blood loss per area, 0.19-0.58 cc/cm(2) (P=0.04). Graft take was similar, 98.2% early and 98.1% later with tourniquet, with 98.2 and 96.8% take without (P>0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Tourniquet use in the unexsanquinated extremity reduced blood loss without affecting engraftment.