RESUMO
Introduction: Carotid artery dissection (CAD) and atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion (ACAO) are major causes of a tandem occlusion in patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO). Presence of tandem occlusions may hamper intracranial access and potentially increases the risk of procedural complications of endovascular treatment (EVT). Our aim was to assess neurological, functional and technical outcome and complications of EVT for intracranial LVO in patients with CAD in comparison to patients with ACAO and to patients without CAD or ACAO. Methods: We analyzed data of the MR CLEAN trial intervention arm and MR CLEAN Registry, acquired in 16 Dutch EVT-centers. Primary outcome was the change in stroke severity by comparing the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 24-48 h after treatment vs. baseline. Secondary outcomes included reperfusion rate and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We compared outcomes and complications between patients with CAD vs. patients with ACAO and patients without CAD or ACAO. Results: In total, we identified 74 (4.7%) patients with CAD, 92 (5.9%) patients with ACAO and 1398 (89.4%) patients without CAD or ACAO. Neurological improvement at short-term after EVT in patients with CAD was significantly better compared to ACAO (resp. mean -5 vs. mean -1 NIHSS point; p = 0.03) and did not differ compared to patients without CAD or ACAO (-4 NIHSS points; p = 0.62). Rates of successful reperfusion in patients with CAD (47%) was comparable to patients with ACAO (47%; p = 1.00), but was less often achieved compared to patients without CAD or ACAO (58%; p = 0.08). Occurrence of sICH did not differ significantly between CAD patients (5%) and ACAO (11%; p = 0.33) or without CAD/ACAO (6%; p = 1.00). Conclusion: EVT in patients with intracranial LVO due to CAD results in neurological improvement comparable to patients without tandem occlusions. Therefore, carotid artery dissection by itself should not be a contraindication for endovascular treatment in stroke patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion. Although more challenging endovascular procedures are to be suspected in both patients with CAD or ACAO, accurate distinction between CAD and ACAO might influence clinical decision making as better clinical outcome can be expected in patients with CAD.
RESUMO
GOAL: Insufficient data is available about safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with minor stroke symptoms because these patients were excluded from most randomized trials. We aimed to compare characteristics, functional outcome, and complications in patients with minor ischemic stroke National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤5 (NIHSS score ≤5) and moderate to severe ischemic stroke (NIHSS score ≥6) due to intracranial proximal artery occlusion of the anterior circulation who underwent EVT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report patients with an anterior circulation occlusion who were included between March 2014 and June 2016 in the multicenter randomized clinical trial of EVT of acute ischemic stroke in the Netherlands Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational study for stroke centers that perform EVT in the Netherlands. Minor ischemic stroke was defined as baseline NIHSS score of 5 or less. Primary outcome is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. FINDINGS: Seventy-one (5.5%) patients had a NIHSS score of 5 or less. Functional independence (mRS 0-2 at 90 days) was reached in 75% of these patients, compared to 40% of patients with NIHSS score of 6 or more. sICH occurred in 4% of patients, of which 1% occurred peri-interventionally. Death occurred in 6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with minor ischemic stroke with an intracranial proximal arterial occlusion of the anterior circulation who underwent EVT have a high chance of favorable outcome and appear to have low occurrence of treatment-related sICH. Therefore, our results encourage the use of EVT for minor ischemic stroke in the absence of effect estimates from controlled studies.