RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Increased medicalization of childbirth in Mexico has not always translated into more satisfactory childbirth experiences for women. In developed countries, pregnant women often prepare written birth plans, outlining how they would like their childbirth experiences to proceed. The notion of expressing childbirth desires with a birth plan is novel in the developing world. We conducted an exploratory study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of introducing birth plans in a hospital serving low-socioeconomic status Mexicans and to document women's and health practitioners' perspectives on the advantages and barriers in implementing a birth plan program. METHODS: We invited 9 pregnant women to prepare birth plans during their antenatal care visits. The women also participated in interviews before and after childbirth. We also conducted in-depth interviews with 4 women who had given birth in the past year, and with 2 nurses, 2 social workers, and 1 physician to learn about their perspectives on the benefits and challenges of implementing a birth plan program. RESULTS: All 9 women who completed a birth plan found the experience highly satisfying, despite the fact that in some cases, their childbirths did not proceed as they had specified in their plans. Interviewed practitioners believed that birth plans could improve the childbirth experience for women and health care practitioners, but facilities often lacked space and financial incentives for birth plan programs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that birth plans are acceptable and feasible in this study population. Facility administrators would need to commit to provide the physical space and financial incentives necessary to ensure successful implementation.
Assuntos
Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/organização & administração , Trabalho de Parto/psicologia , Mães/psicologia , Participação do Paciente/psicologia , Pobreza , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Feminino , Hospitais Urbanos , Humanos , Bem-Estar Materno , México , Narração , Satisfação do Paciente , Gravidez , Apoio Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Although condoms can prevent sexually transmitted infections and unwanted pregnancies, use remains low worldwide. Rather than continue to investigate the barriers to use, this study sought to obtain information from students and factory workers who identify themselves as successful condom users. After developing a novel successful condom use scale, we conducted 793 interviews among students and factory workers in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico and Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. We compared successful users to unsuccessful users and invited successful users to participate in focus group discussions. Among students, successful condom users were more likely to be from Mexico. Factory workers identified as successful condom users were more likely to have had fewer casual sexual partners. Focus group participants cited condoms' accessibility, security, and cleanliness as reasons for use. Use differed by partner type, stable versus casual. These findings should be considered when developing condom promotion campaigns.
Assuntos
Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , República Dominicana , Feminino , Humanos , Indústrias , Masculino , México , Estudantes , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Abortion laws are extremely restrictive in Brazil. The knowledge, opinions of abortion laws, and abortion practices of obstetrician-gynecologists can have a significant impact on women's access to safe abortion. METHODS: We conducted a mail-in survey with a 10% random sample of obstetrician-gynecologists affiliated with the Brazilian Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. We documented participants' experiences performing abortion under a range of legal and illegal circumstances, and asked about which abortion techniques they had experience with. We used chi-square tests and crude logistic regression models to determine which sociodemographic, knowledge-related, or practice-related variables were associated with physician opinion. RESULTS: Of the 1,500 questionnaires that we mailed out, we received responses from 572 (38%). Less than half (48%) of the respondents reported accurate knowledge about abortion law and 77% thought that the law should be more liberal. One-third of respondents reported having previous experience performing an abortion, and very few of these physicians reported having experience with manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) or with misoprostol with either mifepristone or methotrexate. Physicians that favored liberalization of the law were more likely to have correct knowledge about abortion law, and to be in favor of public funding for abortion services. CONCLUSION: Brazilian obstetrician-gynecologists need more information on abortion laws and on safe, effective abortion procedures.
RESUMO
CONTEXT: Given the safety and efficacy of oral contraceptives (OCs), many health professionals believe that these should be widely available over-the-counter (OTC). Opponents of OTC availability argue that without a physician's consultation, women will not be properly screened and will not use OCs correctly, thereby compromising safety and efficacy. However, little is known about the content or quality of physicians' consultations. METHODS: Trained simulated patients (SPs) attended 45 appointments with Mexico City public and private physicians to request a prescription for OCs. Immediately following each appointment, the SPs filled out a checklist regarding the information provided and examinations performed by physicians. RESULTS: Both public and private physicians asked a few questions and provided little information regarding screening, pill-taking instructions, side effect information and warning sign information. Despite the fact that all SPs were appropriate OC candidates, women were denied a prescription in seven (15.6%) appointments mostly because of their age (regarded as either too old or too young). CONCLUSION: In general, Mexican physicians are not providing women thorough information and screening in OC consultations, calling into question the assumption that a physician's appointment is necessary for or will ensure safe, proper OC use.