Updates in the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: To briefly review the latest updates in management in giant cell arteritis, an autoimmune vasculitis affecting the medium to large vessels. RECENT FINDINGS: Here, we review the known and newer trends in management of giant cell arteritis. While high dose glucocorticoids remain the mainstay of therapy, immunosuppressive medications are increasingly utilized to reduce the burden and risk of long-term glucocorticoid use. Published guidelines by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) suggest early use of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive medications in patients with recently diagnosed or relapsing giant cell arteritis. Immunosuppressive medications include oral small molecules such as methotrexate and leflunomide and biologics, including the recently Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved tocilizumab. Glucocorticoids remain the cornerstone of management for newly diagnosed disease but with the increasing use of medications such as IL-6 inhibitors, patients are decreasing steroid use within weeks, thereby limiting risks associated with long-term steroid use.

Industry Payments to Practicing US Rheumatologists, 2014-2019.

OBJECTIVE: Payments from the pharmaceutical industry to practicing physicians may influence prescribing behavior. This study was undertaken to investigate the nature, quantity, and geographic distribution of payments to US rheumatologists. METHODS: General payments from industry sponsors to US rheumatologists from 2014 to 2019 were extracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments database. Gender was identified by linking physicians to the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System registry. Data were reported in aggregate, trends over time were assessed using linear regression models, and differences by gender were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Over the 6-year time period from 2014 to 2019, a total of 1,610,668 payments totaling $221,254,966 were made to 5,723 rheumatologists. The median payment was $15 (interquartile range [IQR] $10 to $22), and the median total amount received by individual rheumatologists over the 6-year period was $2,818 (IQR $464 to $11,560). The majority of rheumatologists (3,416 of 5,723 [60%]) received less than $5,000, but 368 of 5,723 (6%) received more than $100,000 each and accounted for 78% of the total. The yearly value of payments increased over time ($3,703,264 per year; P < 0.001), and the median payment to male rheumatologists was significantly higher than the median payment to female rheumatologists ($3,723 [IQR $542 to $15,841] versus $2,084 [IQR $394 to $8,186]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The value of industry payments has increased over time, and a large amount is concentrated among a small number of rheumatologists. Future studies should investigate the degree to which industry payments have influenced prescribing in the field of rheumatology.