Agreement between computed tomography and ultrasound on abdominal aortic aneurysms and implications on clinical decisions.

OBJECTIVES: The United Kingdom abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme refers aneurysms with ultrasound (US) diameters of ≥5.5 cm to vascular services for consideration of computed tomography (CT) and intervention. We investigated the discrepancy between US and CT, implications on clinical decisions and question at which stage CT be used. DESIGN/METHODS: AAA USs over 5 years were retrospectively analysed. Patients included had aneurysms measuring ≥5 cm on US with subsequent CT within 2 months (n = 123). Based on maximum US diameters, 44 patients had aneurysms between 5 and 5.4 cm (group I) and 79 patients ≥5.5 cm (group II). Results were cross-referenced. Correlation and limits of agreement were calculated. Two radiologists re-measured 44 pairs of CT/US scans and the inter-observer bias in determining discrepancies between imaging modalities calculated. RESULTS: Mean difference between imaging modalities was 0.21 cm (±0.39 cm, p < 0.001). Limits of agreement were -0.55 to 0.96 cm, exceeding clinical acceptability. Mean difference was higher and significant in group I (0.39 cm, p < 0.001) compared to group II (0.10 cm, p > 0.05). Seventy-percent of group I patients had CT scans revealing diameters of ≥5.5 cm. Inter-observer bias was not significant. CONCLUSION: Significant differences between imaging modalities, more in US diameters of below 5.5 cm, exist. We recommend AAAs measuring ≥5 cm on US should undergo earlier referral to a vascular service and CT.

FDG PET/CT in oncology: "raising the bar".

Integrated positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has revolutionized oncological imaging in recent years and now has a firmly established role in a variety of tumour types. There have been simultaneous step-wise advances in scanner technology, which are yet to be exploited to their full potential in clinical practice. This article will review these technological developments and explore how refinements in imaging protocols can further improve the accuracy and efficacy of PET/CT in oncology. The promises, and limitations, of emerging oncological applications of FDG PET/CT in radiotherapy planning and therapy response assessment will be explored. Potential future developments, including the use of FDG PET probes in oncological surgery, advanced data analysis techniques, and the prospect of integrated PET/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) will be highlighted.

Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability in patients with gastric carcinoma.

A proportion of gastric adenocarcinomas exhibit replication errors manifested as microsatellite instability. The clinicopathological and prognostic significance of this abnormality remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the importance of microsatellite instability by analysing a large series of gastric carcinomas from an English population. Using a novel fluorescent polymerase chain reaction technique, we amplified 11 microsatellite sequences from paired normal and carcinoma DNA from 101 patients who underwent a potentially curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Overall, 21% of cases demonstrated microsatellite instability in at least one locus. At least four loci were examined in each case. A replication error positive phenotype (minimum of 29% of loci affected) was detected in 9% of cases. There was no statistically significant association between the presence of microsatellite instability or replication error positive phenotype and the patient's age, sex, tumour site, stage, node status, histological subtype or grade. Carcinomas confined to the mucosa or submucosa (T1) showed a significantly higher frequency of instability and replication error positive phenotypes than T3 lesions (P = 0.03 and P = 0.05, respectively). A larger proportion of patients who were microsatellite instability or replication error positive were alive at 5 years compared with those who were negative but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.15 and P = 0.16, respectively). We identified a subset of gastric carcinomas from a relatively low-risk population which showed evidence of microsatellite instability. There were no statistically significant 5-year survival advantages in cases demonstrating microsatellite instability or replication error positive phenotypes. The detection of microsatellite instability is of limited prognostic value in gastric carcinoma.