Two-rescuer CPR results in hyperventilation in the ventilating rescuer.

The "Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care--International Consensus on Science" recommend a tidal ventilation volume of 10 ml/kg body-weight without the use of supplemental oxygen during two-rescuer adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This relates to a ventilation volume of about 6.4 l/min. Additionally, the first aid provider ventilating the victim will breathe for him/herself during the external chest compression period adding another 3.2 l/min of ventilation. Finally, a deep breath is recommended before each ventilation to increase the end-expiratory oxygen concentration of the air exhaled. To investigate the effects of these recommendations, 20 healthy volunteers were asked to perform two-rescuer CPR in a lung model connected to a BLS-manikin. End-tidal carbon dioxide, oxygen saturation, and heart rate were recorded continuously. Capillary blood gas samples were collected and non-invasive blood pressure was recorded prior to the start of external chest compressions and immediately after the end of each measurement period. Furthermore, hyperventilation related symptoms reported by the volunteers were also recorded. The data reveal a significant decrease in capillary and end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure in the volunteers (P < 0.001). Additionally, in 75% of test persons multiple hyperventilation associated symptoms occurred. Ventilation during two-rescuer CPR performed according to the Guidelines 2000 may cause injury to the health of first aid providers. To minimize hyperventilation, both rescuers should exchange their positions at intervals of 3-5 min. These data challenge the recommendation to take a deep breath prior to each ventilation.

Microbiological, microstructure, and material science examinations of reprocessed Combitubes after multiple reuse.

UNLABELLED: Reprocessing (repeated cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization) and reuse of single-use medical devices has been performed safely with some devices. The aim of our study was to analyze whether reprocessing of the Combitubes (Kendall-Sheridan, Argyll, NY) airway device, used for emergency endotracheal intubation and difficult airway management, is possible and can be performed appropriately and safely. Microbiological, microstructure, and material science examinations were performed with unused, as well as multiple reused and reprocessed Combitubes. The reprocessing procedure consisted of a cleaning, a disinfection, a final inspection, and a sterilization. Microbiological examinations of multiple reused and reprocessed Combitubes found no test organisms in quantitative cultures. A microbial reduction between four and five log levels compared with nonreprocessed tubes was found. Microstructure analysis for the examination of topographical alterations and changes in the chemical composition of the surface demonstrated nonsignificant alterations between new and reprocessed medical devices. In material science examinations, cuff burst pressures were not different between unused and multiple reprocessed Combitubes. The results of all examinations proved that the decontamination process is adequately effective, and that no significant superficial alterations are generated by the multiple reuse and reprocessing of the Combitubes. To assure uniformly good results, a quality management system must be established and only validated methods should be used. IMPLICATIONS: Reprocessing of single-use medical devices offers the opportunity of significant savings and is already performed with some devices. Microbiological, microstructure, and material science examinations proved that reprocessing of multiple reused Combitubes (Kendall-Sheridan, Argyll, NY), mainly used for emergency airway management, is possible and safe.

A case report of difficult ventilation with the Combitube - valve-like upper airway obstruction confirmed by fibreoptic visualisation.

This case report describes difficulty with ventilation because of valve-like upper airway obstruction by aryepiglottic folds after uncomplicated insertion of a Combitube in a 30-year-old female patient. After correct (oesophageal) placement increased ventilation pressures occurred and a fibreoptic device was used to investigate the cause. Valve-like obstruction was discovered and subsequently observed during controlled ventilation. After removal of the Combitube and mask ventilation no valve mechanism was seen. This effect appeared to be due to an increased air stream caused by the obstruction of seven out of eight Combitube perforations.