The role of ataluren in the treatment of ambulatory and non-ambulatory children with nonsense mutation duchenne muscular dystrophy - a consensus derived using a modified Delphi methodology in Eastern Europe, Greece, Israel and Sweden.

BACKGROUND: This paper details the results of an evaluation of the level of consensus amongst clinicians on the use of ataluren in both ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (nmDMD). The consensus was derived using a modified Delphi methodology that involved an exploration phase and then an evaluation phase. METHODS: The exploration phase involved 90-minute virtual 1:1 interviews of 12 paediatric neurologists who cared for 30-120 DMD patients each and had patient contact every one or two weeks. The respondents managed one to ten nmDMD patients taking ataluren. The Discussion Guide for the interviews can be viewed as Appendix A. Following the exploration phase interviews, the interview transcripts were analysed by an independent party to identify common themes, views and opinions and developed 43 draft statements that the Steering Group (authors) reviewed, refined and endorsed a final list of 42 statements. Details of the recruitment of participants for the exploration and evaluation phases can be found under the Methods section. RESULTS: A consensus was agreed (> 66% of respondents agreeing) for 41 of the 42 statements using results from a consensus survey of healthcare professionals (n = 20) experienced in the treatment of nmDMD. CONCLUSIONS: The statements with a high consensus suggest that treatment with ataluren should be initiated as soon as possible to delay disease progression and allow patients to remain ambulatory for as long as possible. Ataluren is indicated for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy that results from a nonsense mutation in the dystrophin gene, in ambulatory patients aged 2 years and older (see Summary of Product Characteristics for each country).

High incidence of multisystem inflammatory syndrome and other autoimmune diseases after SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents in south central Europe.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence and describe the spectrum of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases linked to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination in children from two neighbouring south central European countries. METHODS: We performed a multi-centre prospective cohort study of children under 18 years diagnosed with inflammatory/autoimmune diseases linked to SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination, who were admitted to the paediatric tertiary care hospitals in Slovenia and Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy, from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. Disease incidence was calculated based on laboratory-confirmed cases only. RESULTS: Inflammatory and autoimmune diseases linked to SARS-CoV-2 were diagnosed in 192 children (127 laboratory-confirmed), of whom 112 had multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C), followed by vasculitis, neurological and cardiac diseases. Calculated risk of MIS-C was 1 in 860 children after SARS-CoV-2 infection and cumulative incidence of MIS-C was 18.3/100,000 of all children. Fifteen children had severe COVID-19. Two patients with MIS-C and a patient with myositis presented after COVID-19 vaccination. All 3 had at presentation also a serologically proven recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. After MIS-C, nine patients were vaccinated against COVID-19 and 25 patients had a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, without recurrence of MIS-C. CONCLUSIONS: Autoimmune diseases following SARS-CoV-2 infection in children were 8.5 times as common as severe COVID-19. MIS-C was the most common manifestation and its incidence in this predominantly white population was higher than previously reported. MIS-C does not seem to recur after SARS-CoV-2 reinfection or COVID-19 vaccination. Autoimmune diseases were much more common after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after COVID-19 vaccination.

Vaccination and childhood epilepsies.

INTRODUCTION: The evidence relating vaccination to febrile seizures and epilepsy is evaluated with an emphasis on febrile seizures (FS), Dravet syndrome (DS), West syndrome, and other developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. METHODS: A systematic literature review using search words vaccination/immunization AND febrile seizures/epilepsy/Dravet/epileptic encephalopathy/developmental encephalopathy was performed. The role of vaccination as the cause/trigger/aggravation factor for FS or epilepsies and preventive measures were analyzed. RESULTS: From 1428 results, 846 duplicates and 447 irrelevant articles were eliminated; 120 were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that vaccinations cause epilepsy in healthy populations. Vaccinations do not cause epileptic encephalopathies but may be non-specific triggers to seizures in underlying structural or genetic etiologies. The first seizure in DS may be earlier in vaccinated versus non-vaccinated patients, but developmental outcome is similar in both groups. Children with a personal or family history of FS or epilepsy should receive all routine vaccinations. This recommendation includes DS. The known risks of the infectious diseases prevented by immunization are well established. Vaccination should be deferred in case of acute illness. Acellular pertussis DTaP (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis) is recommended. The combination of certain vaccine types may increase the risk of febrile seizures however the public health benefit of separating immunizations has not been proven. Measles-containing vaccine should be administered at age 12-15 months. Routine prophylactic antipyretics are not indicated, as there is no evidence of decreased FS risk and they can attenuate the antibody response following vaccination. Prophylactic measures (preventive antipyretic medication) are recommended in DS due to the increased risk of prolonged seizures with fever.

Immunosuppression and immunization: Vaccination in pediatric patients with neuromuscular diseases treated with steroids or immune-modulating drugs.

BACKGROUND: Modulating the immune response has proven to be beneficial in different neurologic diseases, even in those not perceived thus far to be autoimmune. METHODS: Extensive literature search has been done for available data on vaccine safety, efficacy and immunization recommendations in patients with neuromuscular disease in general and when receiving immune-modulating treatments. RESULTS: Vaccinations have been associated with some neuromuscular diseases, but these occurrences are very rare and should not influence the general vaccination recommendations for the pediatric population and for the especially vulnerable patient populations, such as neuromuscular disease patients. Specific guidelines for the immunization of children with neuromuscular diseases in general and those on immune-suppressive treatments were not found, but most guidelines and standards of care for specific neuromuscular diseases recognize and stress the importance of vaccinations, some giving more specific instructions. CONCLUSION: With just a few exceptions, vaccines are safe in this group of patients and they should receive the same immunizations and according to the same schedule, as all children. Live vaccines should not be administered in patients receiving high dose steroid or immune-modulating drugs such as anti-B cell treatments (rituximab), high dose methotrexate, azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine. Whenever possible, all live vaccines should be administered prior to long term immune-suppressant treatments. Additional vaccines are recommended in this risk population of children (influenza, pneumococcal, varicella).

Children and young adults with spinal muscular atrophy treated with nusinersen.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of children with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) now includes disease modifying drugs such as nusinersen. Real-world data can provide new insight on the efficacy and safety of nusinersen for treatment of children with SMA. AIM: The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of treatment of children and young adults with SMA type I, II and III at various stages of the disease after 14 months of treatment with nusinersen. METHODS: In this prospective, two-center (in Slovenia and Czech Republic) study, data from all patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of SMA before 19 years of age who were treated with nusinersen were collected before initiation of treatment, and after 6 and 14 months of treatment. Various standardized motor scales and a questionnaire that focused on daily-life activities were used. RESULTS: Form both centers, 61 patients from 2 months to 19 years of age were enrolled in the study. Sixteen had SMA type I (median age 5.2 years); 32 had SMA type II (median age 8.9 years); and 13 had SMA type III (median age 8.6 years). Patients had 2-4 copies of the SMN2 gene. One patient died in the study period and one discontinued treatment. After 14 months of treatment, SMA type I (p = 0.002) and type II (p = 0.002) patients had significantly better outcomes, while type III patients showed a trend towards improvement (p = 0.051) on motor scales. Younger age at the initiation of treatment and a higher number of SMN2 copies is related to a better outcome. Younger children also seem to improve faster compared to older children. No serious side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: The results of our study which included patients of various SMA types and stages of the disease suggest that treatment with nusinersen benefits patients, regardless of SMA type. Earlier age at the initiation of treatment and a higher number of SMN2 copies were related to a better outcome, however even some patients of higher age and/or later stage of the disease benefited from the treatment. Our study also suggests that nusinersen is safe to use, as no major side effects, requiring discontinuation of treatment, were reported. There is an unmet need for novel standardized tests and biomarkers, which could help guide clinician's decisions on the selection of best treatment options and monitor treatment success.

Adaptive skills and mental health in children and adolescents with neuromuscular diseases.

BACKGROUND: Adaptive skills represent the ways that children and adolescents meet their basic needs for self-care, decision making, communication, and learning in their daily life. Having a neuromuscular disease (NMD) not only presents mental health issues, but also impacts these skills. AIMS: Our study aimed to compare the adaptive skills and mental health of paediatric patients with the most common NMDs with their healthy peers and assess how NMDs shape the way patients form relationships with others, engage in leisure activities and take care of their daily living needs. METHODS: We used the Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System (ABAS-3) and Achenbach Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) to compare the adaptive skills and mental health symptoms of 50 NMD patients to a demographically-matched control group of 298 peers. We examined specific outcomes of having myotonic dystrophy (DM), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) or a mixed group of other NMDs. RESULTS: All NMD patients displayed poor practical adaptive skills. When the disease was more likely to involve the central nervous system (DM, DMD) they also showed additional deficits in their conceptual and social skills. Contrary to previous research no increased rate of psychopathological symptoms was found in NMD patients, with the exception of difficulties in the social domain among patients with DM. CONCLUSIONS: Although most children with NMDs displayed more limited practical skills, the specific profile of adaptive skills for each patient group needs to be taken into consideration when planning school support and other psychosocial interventions.

Prevalence and genetic subtypes of congenital myasthenic syndromes in the pediatric population of Slovenia.

AIM: Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are rare, genetically and phenotypically diverse disorders of neuromuscular transmission. Data on prevalence among children are scarce. Whole exome sequencing facilitated discovery of novel CMS mutations and enabled targeted treatment. Our aim was to identify the prevalence, genetic subtypes and clinical characteristics of CMS in pediatric population of Slovenia. METHODS: In this observational, national, cross-sectional study, medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Children with genetically confirmed CMS, referred over a 19 - year period (2000-2018) to the University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia, were included in the study. Genetic and phenotypic characteristics were collected and prevalence of CMS in children was calculated. RESULTS: Eight children with a confirmed genetic mutation in 5 different genes (CHRNE, CHRND, RAPSN, CHAT, MUSK) causative of the CMS were identified. Calculated prevalence of genetically confirmed CMS was 22.2 cases per 1.000.000 children at the end of 2018. INTERPRETATION: The prevalence of genetically confirmed CMS in Slovenian children at the end of 2018 exceeds previously reported prevalence by more than two-fold, which suggests that prevalence in the literature is likely to be underestimated. Two extremely rarely detected mutations in MUSK and CHRND gene were detected and patient's clinical descriptions add important information on genotype-phenotype correlation.

Long-term prospective evaluation of an inpatient voiding reeducation program for lower urinary tract conditions in children.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of our treatment program for children with lower urinary tract conditions, developed at the Department of Pediatric Nephrology of the University Children's Hospital in Ljubljana. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with lower urinary tract conditions were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A received treatment immediately, whereas patients of group B received no treatment for a period of 3 months-the amount of time it takes to complete our program. No child in group B experienced spontaneous regression of their symptoms in the 3-month delay period, while the patients of group A were already being treated and were achieving results. Thus, all the patients of group B then entered the program in exactly the same way as patients of group A. RESULTS: The final success rate in both groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.706-1.000) and ranged from 86.2 % for group A and 86.7 to 90 % for group B. Long-term follow-up showed statistically identical success rates (p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: This prospective controlled study with long-term follow-up (48 months) shows that our treatment program, applied as an inpatient voiding school program, is an effective method, with durable results.