Predictors of matching into an ophthalmology fellowship for international medical graduates: a San Francisco match analysis.

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of international medical graduates (IMGs) applying for ophthalmology fellowship match. METHODS: Design Case control study. Setting San Francisco Fellowship Match data between 2010 and 2017. Participants IMGs applying for ophthalmology fellowships. Main outcome(s) and measure(s) Applicant characteristics for IMGs were stratified by their match outcome and compared using Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney U test. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the effect of applicant characteristics on their match outcomes. RESULTS: 22.62% (785/3471) of the fellowship match applicants were IMGs of which 35.92% (n = 282) matched. This rate was 58% lower than the 86.4% match rate for US-MG (p < 0.001). Factors associated with higher odds of matching among IMGs were graduating from a US residency (Odds Ratio (OR):2.330; 95% Confidence Interval (CI):1.433-3.789), higher USMLE Step 3 score (OR:1.019; 95% CI: 1.006-1.032), applying to more programs (OR:1.035; 95% CI: 1.017-1.053), ranking more programs (OR:1.200; 95% CI: 1.096-1.313) and having a higher percentage of programs ranked (OR:1.021; 95% CI: 1.014-1.028). CONCLUSIONS: Fellowship match rates for IMGs were significantly lower than for US-MGs. IMGs graduating from an ophthalmology residency in the US, scoring higher Step 3 scores, distributing more applications, and ranking more programs had increased odds of matching. This information may assist IMG fellowship applicants and their mentors when they consider pursuing an ophthalmology fellowship program in the US.

The Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric (OSCAR) for Open Globe Surgical Management.

Background/Aims: To produce an internationally developed rubric to assess surgical competency in open globe management. Methods: An international expert panel of seven ophthalmologist educators developed a standardized competency-based rubric. The steps to perform an open globe repair were outlined. Based on a modified Dreyfus model, the experts agreed on the steps of surgery and certain global indices. They then assigned descriptors for the competency expected of a novice, beginner, advanced beginner, and competent surgeon. The tool was then vetted by another panel of ten ophthalmologists. The main outcome measure was the final version of the tool as agreed upon by the expert review panel. Results: The steps of open globe repair and key global indices were established. Descriptive wording for each step and global indices for novice, beginner, advanced beginner, and competent surgery were listed. All the expert comments were integrated to establish face and content validity. Conclusion: This standardized rubric to evaluate resident competency should be used globally in training programs to assess open globe repair surgical skills. Using a modified Dreyfus model, four different levels of training competency were defined allowing a non-biased, objective, numerical and simple assessment.

Pharmacologic Mydriasis Secondary to Topical Glycopyrronium Tosylate Cloths: Clinical Characterization From a Multicenter Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Topical glycopyrronium tosylate (GT) is an anticholinergic medication for treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Pharmacologic mydriasis and anisocoria from topical GT has been reported and may be underrecognized. This study aims to clinically characterize patients presenting with pharmacologic mydriasis from exposure to this medication. METHODS: This study is a retrospective observational case series. A multicenter chart review of 16 patients diagnosed with pharmacologic mydriasis secondary to topical GT was performed. RESULTS: Eight patients (50.0%) were age 18 years and younger, and 14 patients (87.5%) were female. Unilateral mydriasis (anisocoria) occurred in 14 patients (87.5%). Fourteen patients (87.5%) did not initially volunteer topical GT as a "medication," and the history of topical GT exposure needed to be elicited with further questioning. Hand hygiene details were known for 12 patients, and all reported that they did not wash their hands after GT application. Six patients (37.5%) were soft contact lens users. One patient had possible exposure through a family member's use of the medication. Ocular symptoms were common (blurry vision [11 patients, 68.8%] and eye dryness [7 patients, 43.8%]), but systemic anticholinergic symptoms were uncommon (such as constipation [1 patient, 6.3%] and urinary symptoms [3 patients, 18.8%]). CONCLUSIONS: Mydriasis associated with topical GT seems to be a consequence of local exposure rather than systemic toxicity. Because patients may not volunteer topical GT as a medication, eliciting a history of exposure often requires further specific questioning. Soft contact lens wear and poor postapplication hand hygiene seem to be associated with mydriasis in GT use.

Ophthalmology foundation Ophthalmic Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric (OSCAR) for pterygium surgery.

Background: Pterygium surgery is a procedure commonly performed by ophthalmologists. Valid, objective methods are needed to assess competence in this procedure. Methods: A panel of 5 specialists consisting of members from different regions of the world including Pakistan, United States, Iran, Mongolia and Peru was formed to create a rubric for assessment of pterygium surgery by residents. The assessment rubric was developed using the standard template of Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubrics (OSCARs) previously published. The rubric was designed using a modified Dreyfus model of skill acquisition on a four-point behavioral scale. Results: The rubric consisted of 14 essential steps in pterygium surgery and 5 global indices. The content and face validity of the rubric was refined by repeatedly reviewing the rubric on Googledocs and considering critiques by a panel of 10 cornea specialists from around the world. Each step was divided into four levels, from novice to competent. The skill required for each level was described specifically to help decrease rater subjectivity. Conclusions: The OSCAR for pterygium surgery has face-validity and can be used effectively for both teaching and assessing ophthalmology residents in training programs across the world.

The Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric for Intravitreal Injections (ICO-OSCAR:IVI).

(1) Background: Intravitreal injections (IVIs) are the most commonly performed intraocular procedure worldwide. Ensuring correct learning is essential to avoid complications. Our purpose was to develop an internationally valid tool to assess skill in performing IVIs. (2) Methods: A panel of six content experts designed a rubric for assessing the IVI procedure by using a modified Dreyfus scale of skill acquisition, dividing it into steps and providing objective behavioral descriptors for each level of skill in each category, following the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) guidance. The rubric draft was then critically reviewed by 12 international content experts, and their constructive comments were considered for the final rubric. (3) Results: The Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric for IVI (ICO-OSCAR:IVI) is the proposed tool for assessing healthcare professionals training to perform IVI. (4) Conclusions: The ICO-OSCAR:IVI is the result of the consensus of an international expert panel. The methodology used for its development provides this rubric with face and content validity. It can be used globally to assess healthcare professionals training to perform IVI, as well as the impact of different teaching methods on performance. Further studies are required to establish intra- and inter-rater reliability, as well as the predictive validity of this tool.

The International Council of Ophthalmology Ophthalmic clinical evaluation exercise.

Purpose: Fifteen years after the publication of the Ophthalmic Clinical Evaluation Exercise (OCEX), it was deemed necessary to review and revise it, and to validate it for an international audience of ophthalmologists. This study to revise the OCEX and validate it for international use. Methods: The OCEX rubric was changed to a modified Dreyfus scale; a behavioral descriptor was created for each category. An international panel of ophthalmic educators reviewed the international applicability and appropriateness of the tool. Results: A tool for assessing and giving feedback on four aspects of clinical competence during the ophthalmic consultation (interview skills, examination, interpersonal and communication skills, and case presentation) was revised. The original scoring tool was improved to a new behavioral one, and relevant comments and suggestions from international reviewers were incorporated. The new tool has face and content validity for an international audience. Conclusion: The OCEX is the only tool for workplace assessment and feedback specifically for ophthalmology residents and the ophthalmic consultation. This improved and simplified version will facilitate its use and implementation to diverse programs around the world.

Online Faculty Development: An African Lusophone Ophthalmic Society Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: Faculty development for procedural specialists aims at developing both their medical education and surgical competence. This has been challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in under-resourced settings and African Lusophone ophthalmology community has been no exception. The Mozambican College of Ophthalmology (MOC) and the Continuing Professional Development Committee of the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) established a collaboration to enhance simulation-based clinical teaching competence in cataract surgery. METHODS: Ten Mozambican ophthalmologists experienced in teaching cataract surgery participated in a group mentoring assisted 6 month/11 flipped-learning online experience on curriculum design, which included practice-based and social learning strategies, continuous bidirectional feedback, individual and group reflection opportunities, and the demonstration of declarative and procedural competencies. Program evaluation consisted of pre and post-test knowledge assessment; individual homework, informed by curated reading and a recorded lesson; feedback surveys for each module and one month after the program's conclusion, and a longitudinal project on creating a simulation-based education session on one step of cataract surgery. RESULTS: Participants a) highlighted the opportunity to advance their scholarly teaching skills as facilitators; b) showed an increase in knowledge post-test, expressed commitment to improve their learning experiences´ design, include interactive educational methods, and provide constructive feedback; and c) formed a sustained community of practice of ophthalmologists educators (CoP). CONCLUSION: This online faculty development program, assisted by group mentoring, held during the COVID-19 pandemic, facilitated the development of a CoP and was effective in enhancing teaching competence in curriculum design to apply in simulation-based learning environments.

The Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric for External Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgery.

PURPOSE: The International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) is currently developing a series of standardized, internationally validated, teaching tool for key ophthalmic surgical procedures called the Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubrics (OSCARs). This study aims to develop an OSCAR for external dacryocystorhinostomy (ExDCR). METHODS: An international panel of content experts, representing Argentina, India, U.A.E., United Kingdom, and the U.S.A. was established and worked to develop the rubric using a range of online collaboration tools. The team used the standardized OSCAR template as a baseline, developing explicit behavioral descriptors (the behavior and performance expected for each step) that were reviewed and modified with successive models. Learners were scored on a modified 4-point Dreyfus scale of skill acquisition (novice, beginner, advanced beginner, competent) with the removal of the expert domain. The tool was then reviewed by a secondary panel of international content experts, representing Brazil, India, Iran, Singapore, United Kingdom, and the U.S.A. RESULTS: The final OSCAR ExDCR tool was developed in alignment with the ICO-OSCAR standard. Nineteen agreed and weighted stems were produced. Specific comments with regards to the parameters and wording were incorporated to formulate the final rubric, which was internationally agreed and demonstrated face and content validity. CONCLUSIONS: The OSCAR ExDCR is skill and behavior based, has ICO agreed standards for assessment, and provides learners with specific targets for improvement. Although the OSCAR tool has face and content validity, further development could better elucidate its precise role.

Fellowship Match Outcomes in the U.S. From 2010 to 2017: Analysis of San Francisco Match.

PURPOSE: To describe applicant characteristics and outcomes associated with the ophthalmology fellowship match. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. METHODS: This study took place in San Francisco and matched data for ophthalmology fellowship applicants in the USA. The study population was registrants for the 2010-2017 ophthalmology fellowship match cycles. The match rate took place during the 8-year study period. Applicant characteristics were stratified by match status and factors associated with matching to ophthalmology fellowship positions. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2017, most applicants (2,558/3,471; 73.7%) were matched into ophthalmology fellowship programs. No difference over time in the proportion of applicants that matched for fellowship was identified (P = .41). On average, ophthalmology residents who were matched into fellowships had higher step 1 (difference: 9; 99% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-10.9; P < .001), step 2 (difference: 9.5; 99% CI: 7-12; P < .001), and step 3 (difference: 7.4; 99% CI: 5-9.7; P <.001) scores than those who did not match. Applicants who matched also had a greater number of application distributions (difference: 9.6; 99% CI: 7.9-11.2; P < .001), and ranked programs on the match list (difference: 6.2; 99% CI: 5.8-6.7; P < .001). Among applicants who matched, 15% matched at the same institute, 29% matched in the same state, and 45% matched in the same region. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with an increased likelihood of matching into an ophthalmology fellowship program included graduates from the US versus graduates from non-US residency programs (odds ratio [OR]: 2.09; 99% CI: 1.27-3.44; P <.001), increasing percentage of applications ranked (number of ranked programs and/or number of applications distributed) (OR: 1.02; 99% CI: 1.02-1.03; P < .001) as well as having ranked more programs (OR: 1.24; 99% CI: 1.17-1.31; P < .001). Medical graduate status outside of the US (OR: 0.58; 99% CI: 0.36-0.93; P < .001) was associated with decreased odds of matching for fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: From 2010 to 2017, approximately three-quarters of residents applying for an ophthalmology fellowship position matched. Factors associated with increased likelihood of matching included the applicant's graduating from a U.S. residency, graduating from a U.S. medical school, ranking more programs, and having a higher percentage of applications ranked (number of programs ranked by applicant and/or number of applications distributed). The information gained from this study may help applicants as they consider applying to fellowship programs.

Ophthalmic simulated surgical competency assessment rubric (Sim-OSSCAR) for trabeculectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To develop, test and determine whether a surgical-competency assessment tool for simulated glaucoma surgery is valid. METHODS: The trabeculectomy ophthalmic simulated surgical competency assessment rubric (Sim-OSSCAR) was assessed for face and content validity with a large international group of expert eye surgeons. Cohorts of novice and competent surgeons were invited to perform anonymised simulation trabeculectomy surgery, which was marked using the Sim-OSSCAR in a masked fashion by a panel of four expert surgeons. Construct validity was assessed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Krippendorff's alpha was calculated for interobserver reliability. RESULTS: For the Sim-OSSCAR for trabeculectomy, 58 of 67 surgeons (86.6%) either agreed or strongly agreed that the Sim-OSSCAR is an appropriate way to assess trainees' surgical skill. Face validity was rated as 4.04 (out of 5.00). Fifty-seven of 71 surgeons (80.3%) either agreed or strongly agreed that the Sim-OSSCAR contents represented the surgical technique of surgical trabeculectomy. Content validity was rated as 4.00. Wilcoxon rank-sum test showed that competent surgeons perform better than novices (p=0.02). Interobserver reliability was rated >0.60 (Krippendorff's alpha) in 19 of 20 steps of the Sim-OSSCAR. CONCLUSION: The Sim-OSSCAR for trabeculectomy, a newly developed and validated assessment tool for simulation glaucoma surgery, has validity and reliability. It has the potential to play a useful role in ophthalmic surgical education.

CPD? What happened to CME? CME and beyond.

Continuing medical education (CME) has been evolving into continuing professional development (CPD) and more recently into competency-based continuing professional development (CBCPD). We will describe this progression and the consequent changes in CPD programs developed by educators, appraise emerging challenges in CPD, propose strategies to overcome them and conclude by recommending research in CPD as the best way to consistently guide effective CPD programs and systems aligned with the public healthcare needs and expectations.

The Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric (OSCAR) for anterior approach ptosis surgery.

PURPOSE: The International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) is currently developing a series of standardized, internationally validated, teaching tools for key ophthalmic surgical procedures called the Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubrics (OSCARs). This study aims to develop an OSCAR for anterior approach ptosis surgery. METHODS: An international panel of content experts, representing Australia, India, Iran, Italy, Turkey, UK, and the USA was established and worked to develop the rubric using a range of online collaboration tools. The team used the standardised OSCAR template as a baseline, developing explicit behavioural descriptors (the behaviour and performance expected for each step) that were reviewed and modified with successive models. Learners were scored a modified 4-point Dreyfus scale of skill acquisition (novice, beginner, advanced beginner, competent) with the removal of the expert domain. RESULTS: The final OSCAR ptosis tool was developed in alignment with the ICO-OSCAR standard. Seventeen agreed and weighted stems were produced. Domains such as communication and postoperative complications were removed from this rubric as they are evaluated in other spheres of residency training. Specific comments with regard to the parameters and wording were incorporated to formulate the final rubric, which was internationally agreed and demonstrated face and content validity. CONCLUSIONS: The OSCAR for anterior approach ptosis is skill and behaviour-based, has ICO agreed standards for assessment and provides learners with specific targets for improvement. Although the OSCAR ptosis tool has face and content validity, further development could better elucidate its precise role.

Herpes Zoster Optic Neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster optic neuropathy (HZON) is a rare manifestation of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). The aim of our study was to better characterize the clinical features, therapeutic choices, and visual outcomes in HZON. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at multiple academic eye centers with the inclusion criteria of all eyes presenting with optic neuropathy within 1 month of cutaneous zoster of the ipsilateral trigeminal dermatome. Data were collected regarding presenting features, treatment regimen, and visual acuity outcomes. RESULTS: Six patients meeting the HZON inclusion criteria were identified. Mean follow-up was 2.75 months (range 0.5-4 months). Herpes zoster optic neuropathy developed at a mean of 14.1 days after initial rash (range 6-30 days). Optic neuropathy was anterior in 2 eyes and retrobulbar in 4 eyes. Other manifestations of HZO included keratoconjunctivitis (3 eyes) and iritis (4 eyes). All patients were treated with systemic antiviral therapy in addition to topical and/or systemic corticosteroids. At the last follow-up, visual acuity in 3 eyes had improved relative to presentation, 2 eyes had worsened, and 1 eye remained the same. The 2 eyes that did not receive systemic corticosteroids had the best observed final visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Herpes zoster optic neuropathy is an unusual but distinctive complication of HZO. Visual recovery after HZON is variable. Identification of an optimal treatment regiment for HZON could not be identified from our patient cohort. Systemic antiviral agents are a component of HZON treatment regimens. Efficacy of systemic corticosteroids for HZON remains unclear and should be considered on a case-by-case basis.

The Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric for Panretinal Photocoagulation.

PURPOSE: To develop an internationally valid skill-based rubric that can be used as a global standardized platform for teaching, training, and evaluation of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in training programs. DESIGN: A panel of educators and experts in retinal lasers was assembled to develop a standardized objective skill-based rubric. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen international educators and retina specialists. METHODS: The steps to performing slit-lamp delivery of PRP was described in detail. A group of 6 authors reviewed and agreed on the steps and assigned descriptors to expectation levels of novice, beginner, advanced beginner, and expert according to a modified Dreyfuss model. The tool then was vetted by an international panel of 10 retina specialists who are involved in training ophthalmologists in other countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Final version of the tool agreed on by the international review panel. RESULTS: The consecutive steps to performing PRP were outlined and broken down into preparation, procedure, and postoperative care. Descriptive words explaining what to expect from a novice, beginner, advanced beginner, and expert were listed for each step of PRP. Expert comments were incorporated, establishing face and content validity. CONCLUSIONS: This group of authors clearly defined expectations of a trainee at 4 levels of training according to the modified Dreyfus model, and an international panel of retina specialists agreed to its accuracy. This tool, the International Council of Ophthalmology's Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric for Panretinal Photocoagulation, has face and content validity. It can be used globally in training programs both to teach and assess this important comprehensive skill in ophthalmic training.

Evaluation of Horner Syndrome in the MRI Era.

BACKGROUND: To identify the etiologies of adult Horner syndrome (HS) in the MRI era using a targeted evaluation approach and to assess the value and yield of targeted imaging. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of 200 adult outpatients with HS, confirmed with cocaine eyedrop testing. Patients were divided into subgroups based on the presence or absence of symptoms and those who did or did not receive additional testing with hydroxyamphetamine drops. Imaging was obtained based on pharmacologic localization and/or clinical evaluation. The etiology of HS and the yield of imaging were determined in all subgroups. RESULTS: Imaging showed causative lesions in 24 of 179 (12.84%) imaged patients with HS, and 13 (69.0%) were determined "idiopathic." Of the patients who underwent testing with hydroxyamphetamine drops (132 patients), 86 had a postganglionic localization with an imaging yield of 8.1%, and 46 had preganglionic cause with an imaging yield of 21.7%. Fifty-three patients (26.5%) never noticed ptosis/anisocoria before examination, and the imaging yield in this subgroup was 2.8%. Eighteen of the 200 patients (9.0%) had serious pathology, including carotid artery dissection, brain, or neck mass, and 6 of these (31.6%) had acute symptoms and/or pain. CONCLUSIONS: HS is most often idiopathic with serious pathology being relatively infrequent. When determining etiology, the absence of symptoms is not predictive of the pathology. However, acute onset of symptoms and/or pain are possible indicators for serious pathology. Localizing the lesion using hydroxyamphetamine drops whenever obtainable and available is still an efficient way to target imaging evaluation.

Optic Neuropathy As the Initial Presenting Sign of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) Encephalitis.

A 52-year-old woman presented with painless vision loss for 3 months. She was in custody for allegedly robbing a bank and had recently been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. She had 20/100 VA OD, a 2+RAPD, and optic atrophy. Extensive diagnostic workup including MRI, Fluorescein Angiography, Infectious Disease Panel, lumbar puncture, and leptomeningeal biopsy were unrevealing. Vision in her right eye declined to NLP and her left eye declined to 20/200 VA. Anti N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) Autoimmune Encephalitis was diagnosed based on CSF serology and clinical suspicion. Her clinical course improved as she was treated with corticosteroids and rituximab.