Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs.

The objective of this study was to determine the validity and inter-rater reliability of radiographic assessment of sagittal deformity of femoral neck fractures. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting: Level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants: Thirty-one patients 65 years or older who sustained low-energy, Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures imaged with biplanar radiographs and either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were included. Main Outcome Measurements: Preoperative sagittal tilt was measured on lateral radiographs and compared with the tilt identified on advanced imaging. Fractures were defined as "high-risk" if posterior tilt was ≥20 degrees or anterior tilt was >10 degrees. Results: Of 31 Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures, advanced imaging identified 10 high-risk fractures including 8 (25.8%) with posterior tilt ≥20 degrees and 2 (6.5%) with anterior tilt >10 degrees. Overall, there was no significant difference between sagittal tilt measured using lateral radiographs and advanced imaging (P = 0.84), and the 3 raters had good agreement between their measurements of sagittal tilt on lateral radiographs (interclass correlation coefficient 0.79, 95% confidence interval [0.65, 0.88], P < 0.01). However, for high-risk fractures, radiographic measurements from lateral radiographs alone resulted in greater variability and underestimation of tilt by 5.2 degrees (95% confidence interval [-18.68, 8.28]) when compared with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Owing to this underestimation of sagittal tilt, the raters misclassified high-risk fractures as "low-risk" in most cases (averaging 6.3 of 10, 63%, range 6 - 7) when using lateral radiographs while low-risk fractures were rarely misclassified as high-risk (averaging 1.7 of 21, 7.9%, range 1 - 3, P = 0.01). Conclusions: Lateral radiographs frequently lead surgeons to misclassify high-risk sagittal tilt of low-energy femoral neck fractures as low-risk. Further research is necessary to improve the assessment of sagittal plane deformity for these injuries. Level of Evidence: Level IV diagnostic study.

One Dose Versus Two Doses of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Despite its widespread use, a single formulation or dosing regimen of tranexamic acid (TXA) has not been universally agreed on for total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare previously uninvestigated single-dose and two-dose regimens in postoperative hemoglobin level and secondary outcomes within 30 days of surgery. METHODS: A retrospective search of our institution's database of patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty and primary total hip arthroplasty between January 1, 2017, and July 1, 2019, was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: one group received a 1-g bolus of intravenous TXA just before incision and another intravenous 1-g bolus during wound closure, and the second group received a single 1-g intravenous bolus of TXA just before incision. Two doses of TXA were administered in 873 procedures, and a single dose was administered in 647 procedures. RESULTS: A single intravenous TXA dose just before incision was comparable with using two doses of intravenous TXA on patients' postoperative hemoglobin value, length of stay, rate of transfusion, and 30-day postoperative complication rate, although those receiving two doses of TXA trended toward being less likely to require a transfusion (odds ratio = 0.561; 95% confidence interval: 0.296 to 1.062; P = 0.08). A sensitivity analysis was unable to identify a preoperative hemoglobin value that would identify whether patients would benefit from two versus one dose of TXA. DISCUSSION: The use of a single intravenous TXA dose was as efficacious as two doses, without an increase in postoperative complications. Further studies may identify patient subgroups that would benefit from a second dose. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Improving the safety of shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position: a prospective randomized trial investigating the effect of compression stockings on cerebral desaturation events in obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Devastating transient and permanent postoperative neurocognitive complications in previously healthy, low-risk patients have been observed after elective shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position (BCP). Continuous monitoring of cerebral oxygen saturation has been recommended to identify cerebral desaturation events (CDEs) and improve patient safety. However, the relatively high cost and limited availability of monitoring may not be cost-effective. More cost-effective and available measures, including the use of thigh-high compression stockings (CS), have been investigated. However, efficacy data of CS usage is limited, especially for obese patients, who have been shown to be at increased risk for CDEs. The purpose of this was study was to determine if the intraoperative addition of thigh-high compression stockings decreases the incidence, frequency, and magnitude of CDEs in obese patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the BCP. METHODS: Thirty-three patients in the treatment group wore both thigh-high compression stockings (CS) and sequential compression devices (SCDs), and the remaining 33 patients in the control group wore SCDs alone. Cerebral oximetry was monitored during surgery using near-infrared spectroscopy. RESULTS: The incidence of CDEs was equal between groups, with 9 patients (27%) in each experiencing desaturation events. The median number of CDEs per patient was 3 for the control group and 1 for patients wearing CS (P = .29). There was no difference between groups in terms of median time from induction of anesthesia to onset of CDE (P = .79), median time from upright positioning to onset of CDE (P = .60), mean CDE duration per patient (P = .22), and median cumulative CDE duration (P = .19). The median maximal desaturation from baseline was also not different between groups: 27.6% in the control group and 24.3% in the treatment group (P = .35). CONCLUSION: The combination of thigh-high CS and SCDs did not decrease the incidence, frequency, or magnitude of CDEs in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the BCP. Twenty-seven percent of patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the BCP demonstrated CDEs with or without the use of CS. Therefore, further research is required to identify cost-effective, minimally invasive, and universally available methods of decreasing the incidence of CDEs during this common surgical procedure.