Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 268(4): 281-3, 2003 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12764622

RESUMO

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the feasibility of vacuum delivery through a nonfully dilated cervix. The study group consisted of 39 women with vacuum deliveries through a nonfully dilated cervix larger than 9 cm and station of the head at S or more +2 cm. These were compared to a control group of 215 vacuum deliveries at a fully dilated cervix and 46 women who underwent cesarean section at a nonfully dilated cervix larger than 9 cm. The main indication for vacuum extraction in the study group was fetal distress and in the control groups prolonged 2nd stage, dysfunctional labor and fetal distress. Maternal and neonatal morbidity was low and not different between the groups. Neonatal well being, evaluated by cord pH and 5-min Apgar score, was not different. Based on predefined criteria, vacuum extraction through a nonfully dilated cervix is a viable alternative to emergency cesarean section and is apparently not associated with higher maternal or infant morbidity.


Assuntos
Primeira Fase do Trabalho de Parto , Vácuo-Extração , Índice de Apgar , Cesárea , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Sangue Fetal/química , Sofrimento Fetal/terapia , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Recém-Nascido , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/terapia , Gravidez
2.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 107(2): 151-5, 2003 Apr 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12648860

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is a difference in maternal and neonatal outcomes if a sequential operative vaginal or cesarean delivery follows failed vacuum delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A cross sectional study. We have analyzed maternal and neonatal outcomes of 215 vacuum extractions (group 1), 106 forceps assisted deliveries (group 2), 28 deliveries in which failed vacuum extraction were followed by forceps delivery (group 3) and 22 deliveries in which failed vacuum extraction were followed by cesarean delivery (group 4). RESULTS: Compared to other groups, patients in group 4 had significantly more post partum anemia, meconium stained amniotic fluid and hospital stay (both maternal and neonatal) as well as lower pH. Apgar scores were similar in groups 3 and 4. Incidence of respiratory distress syndrome, cephalhematoma and jaundice were similar in neonates of all groups. CONCLUSIONS: If an attempted vacuum delivery has failed, the risk of adverse neonatal outcome is increased with either subsequent forceps or cesarean delivery. It should remain in the judgment of the attending obstetrician to choose the method most suitable under the given circumstances.


Assuntos
Resultado da Gravidez , Vácuo-Extração , Adulto , Líquido Amniótico , Anemia/epidemiologia , Índice de Apgar , Cesárea , Estudos Transversais , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Distocia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Sofrimento Fetal , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Recém-Nascido , Segunda Fase do Trabalho de Parto , Tempo de Internação , Mecônio , Forceps Obstétrico , Gravidez , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/epidemiologia , Ombro , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...