Is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effective to improve cognition and functionality after severe traumatic brain injury? A perspective article and hypothesis.

Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is an important cause of disability and mortality and affects people of all ages. Current scientific evidence indicates that motor dysfunction and cognitive impairment are the main limiting factors in patients with sTBI. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) seems to be a good therapeutic option, but when it comes to patients with sTBI, the results are inconclusive, and some protocols have not yet been tested. In addition, there is still a lack of information on tDCS-related physiological mechanisms, especially during the acute phase. In the present study, based on current evidence on tDCS mechanisms of action, we hypothesized that performing tDCS sessions in individuals with sTBI, especially in the acute and subacute phases, together with conventional therapy sessions, could improve cognition and motor function in this population. This hypothesis presents a new possibility for treating sTBI, seeking to elucidate the extent to which early tDCS may affect long-term clinical outcomes.

Predictors of Mortality and Functional recovery after severe traumatic brain injury: protocol for a prospective cohort study

Introduction: traumatic brain injury is a global public health problem due to its severity and high rates of morbimortality worldwide. Identifying predictors associated with increased mortality and unfavorable functional outcomes after the traumatic brain injury event is crucial for minimizing morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, this study aims to establish a protocol to investigate the predictors of mortality and functional recovery after severe traumatic brain injury in Brazil.Methods: The study will include all patients admitted for severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8) at the State Hospital of Urgency and Emergency, which is the referral trauma hospital of Espirito Santo. The outcomes of interest are hospital mortality and functional recovery 24 months after hospital discharge. Subjects will be followed up at seventy-two hours, three months, six months, twelve months, and twenty-four months after the trauma. Morbidity will be determined by assessing: 1) the level of motor and cognitive disability, 2) functional impairment and quality of life, and 3) aspects of rehabilitation treatment. Additionally, the traumatic brain injury load, estimated by the years of life lost, will be calculated. Discussion: the results of this study will help identify variables that can predict morbidity and mortality, as well as diagnostic and therapeutic targets for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Furthermore, the findings will have practical implications for: 1) the development of public policies, 2) investments in hospital infrastructure 3) understanding the socioeconomic impact of functional loss in the individuals.Study registration: the study received approval from the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Espirito Santo under protocol number 4.222.002 on August 18, 2020.

Introdução: traumatismo cranioencefálico é um problema global de saúde pública devido à sua gravidade e altas taxas de morbimortalidade em todo o mundo. Identificar preditores associados ao aumento da mortalidade e desfechos funcionais desfavoráveis após o evento do traumatismo craniencefálico é primordial para minimizar as taxas de morbidade e mortalidade. Portanto, este estudo tem como objetivo estabelecer um protocolo para investigar os preditores de mortalidade e recuperação funcional após traumatismo cranioencefálico grave no Brasil. Métodos: este estudo tem como objetivo investigar os preditores de mortalidade e recuperação funcional em pacientes com traumatismo cranioencefálico, além de fornecer uma visão geral do traumatismo cranioencefálico no estado do Espírito Santo. O estudo abrangerá todos os pacientes internados por traumatismo cranioencefálico grave (Escala de Coma de Glasgow ≤ 8) no Hospital Estadual de Urgência e Emergência, o hospital de referência para traumas no Espírito Santo. Os desfechos de interesse incluem mortalidade hospitalar e recuperação funcional após 24 meses da alta hospitalar. Os participantes serão acompanhados em setenta e duas horas, três meses, seis meses, doze meses e vinte e quatro meses após o trauma. A morbidade será determinada pela avaliação de: 1) nível de incapacidade motora e cognitiva, 2) comprometimento funcional e qualidade de vida, e 3) aspectos do tratamento e reabilitação. Além disso, a carga de traumatismo cranioencefálico, estimada em anos de vida perdidos, será calculada. Discussão: os resultados deste estudo ajudarão a identificar variáveis que podem predizer a morbidade e a mortalidade após traumatismo cranioencefálico grave. Além disso, as descobertas terão implicações práticas para: 1) o desenvolvimento de políticas públicas, 2) investimentos em infraestrutura hospitalar e 3) compreensão do impacto socioeconômico da perda funcional nesses indivíduos. Registro do estudo: o estudo recebeu aprovação do Comitê de Ética da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo sob o número de protocolo 4.222.002 em 18 de agosto de 2020

Perfil epidemiológico de pacientes amputados atendidos em um centro público de reabilitação / Epidemiological profile of amputees in a public rehabilitation center

Introdução: A perda parcial ou total de um membro causa inúmeros desafios físicos e psicossociais, incluindo redução na qualidade de vida, bem como limitações e restrições na participação social do indivíduo. Objetivos: Este estudo teve como objetivo descrever o perfil epidemiológico, coletar dados da amputação e da reabilitação dos pacientes atendidos no Centro de Reabilitação Física do Espírito Santo (CREFES). Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo e descritivo que consistiu na análise de 509 prontuários devidamente preenchidos de pacientes amputados atendidos na Unidade de Trabalho de Órteses e Próteses do CREFES de 2012 a 2018. Resultados: Observou-se predomínio de amputados do sexo masculino (72%), maiores de 60 anos (36%) e de amputações de membro inferior (94,4%). A principal etiologia das amputações foi a vascular (59%), seguida de acidentes de trânsito (23%). O tempo de início de reabilitação foi em média 27 meses e 34,97% chegaram de fato à protetização. Conclusão: As principais etiologias de amputação são de natureza preveníveis. Consiste, portanto, em um problema de saúde pública que requer atenção de uma equipe multidisciplinar.

Home-based is as effective as centre-based rehabilitation for improving upper limb motor recovery and activity limitations after stroke: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to examine the effects of home-based exercises in comparison with centre-based exercises for improving the paretic upper limb after stroke. DATA SOURCES: AMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and PEDro databases. REVIEW METHODS: Only randomized clinical trials were included. Participants in the reviewed studies were adults at any time after stroke. The experimental intervention was home-based exercises compared with centre-based exercises. Outcome data related to strength, motor recovery, dexterity, activity, and participation were extracted from the eligible trials and combined in meta-analyses. The quality of included trials was assessed by the PEDro scores. The quality of evidence was determined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: Eight trials, involving 488 participants, were included. Most trials (63%) delivered semi-supervised interventions (amount of supervision 3-43%), and three trials provided full supervision. Random-effects meta-analyses provided moderate- to high-quality evidence that home- and centre-based exercises provide similar effects on motor recovery (MD 1.4 points; 95% CI -0.9 to 3.8), dexterity (MD -0.01 pegs/s; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.05), upper limb activity performance (SMD -0.04; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.18), and quality of movement (0.1 points; 95% CI -0.2 to 0.4). Effects on strength were also similar but the quality of the evidence was rated as low. No trials examined effects on participation. CONCLUSION: Effects of home-based prescribed exercises on upper limb motor recovery, dexterity, and activity are likely to be similar to improvements obtained by centre-based exercises after stroke.