Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ophthalmol Retina ; 8(6): 521-526, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38122867

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the rates and outcomes of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections (IVIs) for patients pretreated with 5% povidone-iodine (PI) and 0.05% chlorhexidine (CHX). DESIGN: A retrospective, single-center, comparative cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 8686 patients were included in the study, and a total of 67 695 anti-VEGF injections were performed from January 1, 2019, to November 30, 2021. SETTING: A private retina practice of 13 retina specialists in Colorado. METHODS: Using electronic health records, patients with preinjection preparation with PI or CHX were compiled retrospectively. Use of prefilled versus nonprefilled syringes was also tabulated. Patients with postinjection endophthalmitis (PIE) were identified among the 2 groups. Postinjection endophthalmitis is defined as an inflammation of the eye from infectious agents after an IVI. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity (VA) was determined at the time of causative anti-VEGF injection, endophthalmitis presentation, and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 67 695 IVIs were administered by 13 retina specialists during the study period. A total of 13 of 32 802 (0.0396%; 1 in 2523 injections) cases of presumed endophthalmitis occurred in the PI group, and 9 of 34 893 (0.0258%; 1 in 3877 injections) cases in the CHX group (P = 0.395). For the PI group, there were 2 culture-positive endophthalmitis cases (0.0061%, 1 in 16 401), compared with 2 cases in the CHX group (0.00573%, 1 in 17 447) (P = 1.000). No significant difference was observed in the average logMAR VA of PI and CHX at causative injection (P = 0.3851), endophthalmitis encounter (P = 0.7718), and 3-month follow-up (P = 0.6152). A significant reduction in presumed endophthalmitis (P = 0.0445) and culture-positive cases (P = 0.0130) was present for prefilled IVI compared with nonprefilled injections. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in the rate of endophthalmitis or visual outcomes were found in the CHX group compared with the PI group. Prefilled syringes were associated with a significant reduction in endophthalmitis rate. Further multicenter studies are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of CHX compared with PI for IVI preparation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese , Anti-Infecciosos Locais , Clorexidina , Endoftalmite , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas , Injeções Intravítreas , Povidona-Iodo , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Acuidade Visual , Humanos , Endoftalmite/diagnóstico , Endoftalmite/etiologia , Endoftalmite/prevenção & controle , Povidona-Iodo/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Masculino , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/etiologia , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Humor Aquoso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...