Sex difference between target levels of cholesterol-related parameters and post-PCI long-term clinical outcomes: From the FU-Registry.

BACKGROUND: Since single lipid parameters are too weak to predict the risk of coronary artery disease, we examined whether the allocation of patients into four groups based on achievement of the target levels set by the Japan Atherosclerosis Guidelines at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) would reveal different long-term (5 years) clinical outcomes in males and females. METHODS: The results of a 5-year follow-up study are summarized as FU-Registry, Long-Term Clinical Outcome Results. The subjects consisted of 1158 patients who underwent elective PCI. The male and female patients were separately allocated into four groups: (1) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C≥40mg/dl as well as low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C)≥100mg/dl); (2) HDL-C≥40mg/dl as well as LDL-C<100mg/dl; (3) HDL-C<40mg/dl as well as LDL-C≥100mg/dl; (4) HDL-C<40mg/dl as well as LDL-C<100mg/dl, for a comparison of both patient as well as lesion characteristics and the endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). RESULTS: Regarding lesion characteristics, significant differences (p<0.05) were detected in the usage rate of a drug-eluting stent (DES) as well as the bend, stent reference diameter, and stent minimum lumen diameter in females by ANOVA, and in severe calcification, the bend, and usage rate of DES (p<0.001) in males. In females, significant differences (p<0.05) were observed in MACEs and target lesion revascularization-PCI. In contrast, among males, the four groups had nearly equivalent outcomes. Uni- and multivariate analyses revealed that HDL-C as well as LDL-C in females were associated with MACEs [OR 3.29 (95% CI 1.05-8.57, p=0.04)], while no association was observed in male multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In female patients, HDL-C<40mg/dl and LDL-C≥100mg/dl were even more strongly related to MACEs, whereas the combination of LDL-C and HDL-C was not related to MACEs in male patients.

A rare case of acute myocardial infarction with a non-specific symptom in a young female with systemic lupus erythematosus.

A 31-year-old female with an 18-year history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) complained of epigastralgia and consulted the emergency outpatient department at our hospital. Her physical examination revealed tenderness at the scrobiculus cordis, which was a non-specific symptom of coronary heart disease (CHD). We ultimately gave a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction based on coronary angiography and performed percutaneous coronary intervention. Although pre-interventional intravascular ultrasound demonstrated distinct atherosclerotic lesions in the coronary arteries, there were no atherosclerotic lesions in other systemic arteries. Although CHD in young SLE patients is a significant cause of morbidity and premature death, it tends to be misdiagnosed because their symptoms may be non-specific. In addition, this case highlights the fact that even SLE patients with no systemic atherosclerosis are at risk for the development of CHD. .

Is a bare-metal stent still useful for improving the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention? From the FU-Registry.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent (DES) is increasingly being used for the treatment of coronary artery diseases. However, the role and effectiveness of PCI with a bare metal stent (BMS) have not yet been established. METHODS: Among the 2197 patients (2653 lesions) treated with PCI from 2003 to 2012 at three institutions in Fukuoka, 859 patients (1032 lesions) without acute coronary syndrome and in whom we were able to perform follow-up coronary angiography after stent placement and collect detailed data were selected for this study. Among the patients treated by BMS, the cut-off lesion reference for the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR) was calculated by comparing patients with and without ISR. In all patients with a lesion reference above/below the cut-off point of BMS-ISR, medium-term clinical and angiographic outcomes were compared between the BMS and DES groups. RESULTS: In patients treated with a BMS, the lesion reference [odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.97, p=0.03] was strongly correlated with ISR, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.704, with moderate accuracy. Calculation of the cut-off lesion reference for BMS-ISR, using a relative cumulative frequency distribution and a sensitivity/specificity curve, showed that the cut-off lesion reference for BMS-ISR was 3.08mm, and the sensitivity/specificity was 60.4%. For the DES and BMS groups in cases with a lesion reference over 3.08mm, BMS placement did not correlate with ISR (odds ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.12), and there was also no correlation between BMS and major adverse cardiac events. CONCLUSION: In patients with a lesion reference≧3.08mm, medium-term clinical and angiographic outcomes were equivalent between the use of a DES and BMS. Thus, BMS placement is well worth considering, especially in patients with a lesion reference≧3.08mm, in whom double-antiplatelet therapy needs to be stopped at an early stage.

Association Between Visit-to-Visit Variability in Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Events in Hypertensive Patients After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Visit-to-visit variability (VVV) in blood pressure (BP) in addition to high BP has been shown to be a strong predictor of coronary events and stroke. Therefore, we investigated the associations between VVV in BP or BP levels and cardiovascular events after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We enrolled 176 hypertensive patients who had undergone successful PCI and who had four clinic visits to measure BP until follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) at 6 - 9 months after PCI. The patients were divided into those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS group; n = 50) and those with stable angina pectoris (SAP group; n = 126). We determined VVV in BP expressed as the standard deviation (SD) of average BP, average, and the maximum and minimum BP during the follow-up period. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and all-cause death) were also analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in VVV in BP, average BP or maximum or minimum BP between the patients with and without MACE in all patients, the ACS and SAP groups. Interestingly, in the ACS group, VVV in SBP and maximum SBP in patients with MI were significantly higher than those in patients without MI. The cut-off levels for VVV in BP and maximum SBP that gave the greatest sensitivity and specificity for MI in the ACS group were 15.1 and 138 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSION: Higher VVV in SBP and maximum SBP in patients with ACS after successful PCI were associated with the onset of MI.