Pelvic Floor Health Index: Initial validation of a practical postpartum tool for busy clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: To design a primary care clinical tool (Pelvic Floor Health Index [PFHI]) to screen for postpartum pelvic floor disorders, as well as complete its psychometric validation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two tertiary care obstetric centres in Vancouver, BC. PARTICIPANTS: Primiparous women older than 19 years of age who were in the immediate postpartum period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The PFHI was administered to 74 primiparous women immediately postpartum and at 2, 4, and 6 months postpartum. For evaluation of convergent and divergent construct validity, participants also completed several validated questionnaires, including the Female Sexual Functioning Index, the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Fifteen women repeated their 6-month questionnaires 2 weeks later in order to determine test-retest reliability. Responsiveness was assessed by measuring the PFHI score change from baseline to 6 months postpartum. RESULTS: Pelvic Floor Health Index score was inversely correlated with subscale scores on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory at all time points. There were moderate correlations between PFHI score and the Female Sexual Functioning Index and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey scores at several time points. There were weak correlations with postpartum depression scores. The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.78 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.92). The PFHI mean total score significantly improved by 1.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.6) at 6 months postpartum. CONCLUSION: The PFHI is a 10-item, newly validated, and psychometrically robust questionnaire that can be administered to patients in the postpartum period to screen for pelvic floor dysfunction.

Performance of Perioperative Tasks for Women Undergoing Anti-incontinence Surgery: Developed by the AUGS Quality Improvement and Outcomes Research Network.

OBJECTIVES: Surgery for the correction of stress urinary incontinence is an elective procedure that can have a dramatic and positive impact on quality of life. Anti-incontinence procedures, like inguinal hernia repairs or cholecystectomies, can be classified as high-volume/low-morbidity procedures. The performance of a standard set of perioperative tasks has been suggested as one way to optimize quality of care in elective high-volume/low-morbidity procedures. Our primary objective was to evaluate the performance of 5 perioperative tasks-(1) offering nonsurgical treatment, (2) performance of a standard preoperative prolapse examination, (3) cough stress test, (4) postvoid residual test, and (5) intraoperative cystoscopy for women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence-compared among surgeons with and without board certification in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS). STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective chart review of anti-incontinence surgical procedures performed between 2011 and 2013 at 9 health systems. Cases were reviewed for surgical volume, adverse outcomes, and the performance of 5 perioperative tasks and compared between surgeons with and without FPMRS certification. RESULTS: Non-FPMRS surgeons performed fewer anti-incontinence procedures than FPMRS-certified surgeons. Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery surgeons were more likely to perform all 5 perioperative tasks compared with non-FPMRS surgeons. After propensity matching, FPMRS surgeons had fewer patients readmitted within 30 days of surgery compared with non-FPMRS surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery surgeons performed higher volumes of anti-incontinence procedures, were more likely to document the performance of the 5 perioperative tasks, and were less likely to have their patients readmitted within 30 days.

Cannabis use preferences in women with myofascial pelvic pain: A cross-sectional study.

Objective: Myofascial tenderness is present in most chronic pelvic pain conditions and causes significant distress to patients. Treatment is challenging and often not curative. Cannabis is often used for self-management of chronic pelvic pain. However, we do not know which concentrations and routes of administration are most acceptable to users. We aimed to investigate patterns and willingness of cannabis product use among both habitual users and non-users with myofascial pelvic pain (MPP), to inform therapeutic development. Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional study of questionnaire responses from female patients with MPP from two tertiary pelvic pain centers. We aimed for a convenience sample of 100 responses with representation from both centers. Inclusion criteria were age over 18 with pelvic floor muscle tenderness on standard gynecologic examination. We collected information on demographics, pelvic pain history, cannabis use status, cannabis use preferences, validated opioid misuse risk assessment, and interest in using gynecologic cannabis products and used descriptive analyses. Results: 77/135 (57 %) questionnaire respondents were cannabis users and 58 (43 %) were non-users. Most users consume cannabis daily, (48.1 %) orally (66.2 %) or by smoking (60.7 %), and rated cannabis as effective at relieving pelvic pain. 37/58 (63.8 %) non-cannabis users responded that they would be willing to use cannabis for pelvic pain. Lack of information and potential adverse effects were the most common reasons for unwillingness to use. Approximately 3 of 4 respondents were willing to try vaginal or vulvar application of cannabis products for pelvic pain. Conclusions: This cross-sectional study describes cannabis use patterns in MPP patients. Topical vulvar and vaginal cannabis products are of strong interest to both cannabis users and non-users and warrant further research.

Pelvic floor healing milestones after obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective case control feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Severe perineal tears can predict bothersome pelvic floor disorders later in life. We have a poor understanding of pelvic floor changes during the third trimester and the first few postpartum months. We aimed to compare women with severe perineal trauma during childbirth with women who experienced minimal trauma, for condition-specific quality of life, sexual function, mental health and overall quality of life in the first 6 months postpartum. METHODS: We recruited primiparous women with third- or fourth-degree tears (obstetric anal sphincter injuries, OASIS) and age-matched controls with no tears or first-degree tears in the immediate postpartum period. Participants completed validated questionnaires at baseline, 2, 4 and 6 months postpartum. Mixed effects linear regression or quantile regression adjusted for baseline score were used to compare the groups as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 74 women completed at least one questionnaire (35 OASIS, 39 controls). Both groups had similar demographics. Women with OASIS tended to have worse Pelvic Floor Distress Index-40 scores at month 2; median scores were similar in the two groups by month 6. They also had significantly lower Female Sexual Function Index scores (mean difference: -6.1; 95% CI: -11.9, -0.2, p=0.043) at month 2. There were no mental health group differences and quality of life improved over time, mainly in the OASIS group. Six-month participant attrition rate was 52%. CONCLUSIONS: Women with OASIS encounter specific pelvic floor challenges during the first 6 months postpartum. Although our recruitment rate was high, the attrition rate was also high, demonstrating challenges with retention of postpartum women into longitudinal research.

Documenting Perineal and Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injury Care at Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates whether maternity care providers document guideline-based recommendations for the prevention and care of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) for their labour and delivery patients. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study, aiming for a convenience sample of 60 primiparous women, over 19 years of age, equally representative of patients who experienced severe (third- and fourth-degree) and minimal (intact or first-degree) tears during vaginal birth. Information on patient demographics, delivery details, and guideline-endorsed preventative and management measures were collected. Descriptive statistics were used when appropriate. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 73 women, 34 of whom had severe tears and 39 of whom had minimal tears. Preventative measures, including fetal head control and perineal support during delivery, were documented for 1 out of 73 patients. The use of perineal massage and warm compress to the perineum was not documented. A rectal exam after delivery was documented for 30% (22/73) of all patients and 62% (21/34) of patients with OASIS. Sixty-five percent (22/34) of patients with OASIS received intravenous antibiotics, 88% (30/34) received laxatives, and 100% received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Post-void residual was not documented for any patients. Patients recalled being informed about their OASIS in 68% (23/34) of cases and being referred to pelvic physiotherapy in 47% (16/34) of cases. CONCLUSION: In our study, perineal care practices during and after childbirth, as detailed in the national OASIS guideline, were incompletely documented. This may indicate partial guideline adherence or suboptimal medical record-keeping.