Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mol Biol Evol ; 22(9): 1929-39, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15944442

RESUMO

The genus Rumex includes hermaphroditic, polygamous, gynodioecious, monoecious, and dioecious species, with the dioecious species being represented by different sex-determining mechanisms and sex-chromosome systems. Therefore, this genus represents an exceptional case study to test several hypotheses concerning the evolution of both mating systems and the genetic control of sex determination in plants. Here, we compare nuclear intergenic transcribed spacers and chloroplast intergenic sequences of 31 species of Rumex. Our phylogenetic analysis supports a systematic classification of the genus, which differs from that currently accepted. In contrast to the current view, this new phylogeny suggests a common origin for all Eurasian and American dioecious species of Rumex, with gynodioecy as an intermediate state on the way to dioecy. Our results support the contention that sex determination based on the balance between the number of X chromosomes and the number of autosomes (X/A balance) has evolved secondarily from male-determining Y mechanisms and that multiple sex-chromosome systems, XX/XY1Y2, were derived twice from an XX/XY system. The resulting phylogeny is consistent with a classification of Rumex species according to their basic chromosome number, implying that the evolution of Rumex species might have followed a process of chromosomal reduction from x = 10 toward x = 7 through intermediate stages (x = 9 and x = 8).


Assuntos
Genes de Plantas , Filogenia , Rumex/genética , Sequência de Bases , Evolução Molecular , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Reprodução/genética , Rumex/classificação
2.
J Occup Environ Med ; 45(9): 984-92, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14506341

RESUMO

This work studied the mutagenic potential and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) levels onto PM10 collected in diesel revision plants, in an urban area as well as in a rural area in Santiago, Chile. The PM10 average levels in diesel emission plants during working hours (there is no occupational PM10 Chilean standard) were significantly higher than the atmospheric Chilean PM10 standard and highly mutagenic and with high PAHs levels. Additionally, we evaluated the contribution of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms on 1-OH-pyrene urinary levels. The diesel-exposed workers carrying the CYP1A1*2A allele showed significantly higher 1-OH-P levels than the subjects from the rural area with the same genotype. The higher levels of 1-OH-P were found in individuals carrying the combined CYP1A1*2A and GSTM1 null genotype. This kind of information might be relevant to establish prevention, protection, and mitigation actions to protect public health.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental , Mutagênicos/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Saúde Ocupacional , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análise , Emissões de Veículos/análise , Adulto , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Chile , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metalurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Tamanho da Partícula , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/efeitos adversos , Probabilidade , Medição de Risco , Emissões de Veículos/efeitos adversos
3.
Clin Ther ; 25(5): 1469-89, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12867222

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Elevated systolic blood pressure is a more important risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease than elevated diastolic blood pressure. Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is the predominant form of hypertension in the elderly. Effects of angiotensin II on the vascular wall and endothelium may contribute to development of ISH. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the effects on trough sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP) of a regimen of losartan, a selective angiotensin II-receptor antagonist, and an amlodipine-based regimen in patients with ISH. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study consisted of a 4-week placebo phase and an 18-week active-treatment phase. The losartan-based regimen consisted of losartan 50 mg, increased as needed to losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg at week 6 and to losartan 100 mg/HCTZ 25 mg at week 12 to achieve a target SiSBP <140 mm Hg. the amlodipine-based regimen consisted of amlodipine 5 mg, increased as needed to amlodipine 10 mg at week 6 and to amlodipine 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg at week 12. The primary efficacy measure was change in trough SiSBP from baseline to week 18. Information on the tolerability of study treatments was collected at each visit, including the investigator's and patient's observations of clinical adverse experiences (CAEs), laboratory adverse experiences, and responses to a symptom questionnaire. RESULTS: Eight hundred fifty-seven patients (65.6% female) were randomized to treatment, 432 in the losartan group and 425 in the amlodipine group. Their mean age was 67.6 years, and they had a mean duration of hypertension of 6.7 years at baseline. The losartan and amlodipine groups (intent-to-treat population) had baseline mean SiSBP values of 171.2 and 171.9 mm Hg, respectively. At week 18 (the primary end point), the mean change from baseline in SiSBP was -27.4 mm Hg for 426 patients who received losartan and -28.1 mm Hg for 419 patients who received amlodipine (estimated least-square mean difference, 0.3 mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.4 to 2.0), indicating that losartan's effect on systolic blood pressure was noninferior to that of amlodipine. The proportion of patients who responded (SiSBP <140 mm Hg or a > or =20-mm Hg decrease in SiSBP from baseline) was comparable between groups (73.9% losartan, 75.4% amlodipine). The incidence of CAEs and drug-related CAEs was significantly greater in the amlodipine group (amlodipine, 79.8% and 43.8%, respectively; losartan, 67.8% and 25.5%; P < or = 0.001). In addition, more patients in the amlodipine group discontinued therapy due to a drug-related CAE compared with patients in the losartan group (12.9% vs 4.4%, respectively; P < or = 0.001). Lower-extremity edema was the most common drug-related CAE in the amlodipine group (24.0% amlodipine, 2.5% losartan; P < or = 0.001); dizziness was the most common drug-related CAE in the losartan group (6.0% losartan, 4.0% amlodipine). CONCLUSIONS: In these patients with ISH, losartan and amlodipine produced comparable clinically relevant reductions in SiSBP; however, losartan was better tolerated, as evidenced by fewer CAEs and discontinuations compared with amlodipine. Losartan may be considered for the initial treatment of ISH.


Assuntos
Anlodipino/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Losartan/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anlodipino/efeitos adversos , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Losartan/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...