RESUMO
Wilkie's syndrome is a rare cause of duodenal obstruction that can easily be missed at clinical practice. It is characterized by nausea, abdominal pain and vomit. It usually affects young adults, and it's caused by a low aortomesenteric angle resulting in vascular compression of the duodenum. Symptoms could resemble many of the symptoms presented in a patient with a suspected eating disorder. The non-specificity of the clinical signs and symptoms can confuse, delay the diagnosis and expose the patient to potentially hazardous therapies. We report a case of a 20-year-old patient who presented to the emergency room with a history of intermittent vomiting and abdominal pain. He had been previously misdiagnosed with an eating disorder and received physiological therapy. Nonetheless, his pain persisted. After further evaluation with the use of imaging techniques, a low aortomesenteric angle was discovered. He underwent surgery and completely recovered. On follow up controls patient is well and he no longer had episodes of vomiting.
RESUMO
Introducción: la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo es la pérdida involuntaria de orina debido al aumento de presión intra- abdominal. El abordaje vaginal por cinta mediouretral es actualmente el método quirúrgico de elección para el tratamiento de IUE con las técnicas: cinta vaginal sin tensión (TVT) y cinta a través del músculo obturador (TOT). Objetivo: determinar la eficacia y complicaciones observadas after the placement of synthetic midurethral sling for the surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in a period of 3 years at HCAM. posterior a la colocación mediouretral de malla sintética TVT y TOT en el tratamiento quirúrgico de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo en un período de 3 años en el HCAM. Materiales y métodos: se realizó un análisis retrospectivo en pacientes que fueron sometidas a cirugía con la colocación de malla mediouretral para IUE en el HCAM. 218 pacientes fueron estudiados, se registraron datos clínico-demográficos, perioperatorios, transoperatorios, y del seguimiento postoperatorio incluidas complicaciones y mejoría clínica de la IU para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de los métodos. TVT en la apreciación subjetiva y objetiva de la mejoría clínica (87% vs 82% y 92% vs 90% respectivamente). La perforación vesical se presentó en el 14% en el grupo TVT vs 0.5% del grupo TOT. Complicaciones graves que llevaron a reoperación se presentaron mayoritariamente en el grupo TVT (4.8% vs 2.25% / p= 0.356). Conclusiones: comparativamente, ambas técnicas mostraron similar eficacia a través del tiempo de estudio. Sin embargo TOT tendría menos complicaciones, especialmente en referencia a la perforación vesical. Además, TVT requirió mayor tiempo operatorio, estancia hospitalaria.
Introduction: stress urinary incontinence is the involuntary loss of urine due to increased intra-abdominal pressure. The vaginal approach using midurethral slings is now the most common surgical method for the treatment of SUI with two main techniques: tension free vaginal sling [TVT] and transobturator midurethral sling [TOT]. Objective: to determine the efficacy and complications observed after the placement of synthetic midurethral sling for the surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in a period of 3 years at HCAM. Materials and methods: a retrospective analysis was performed in patients who underwent surgery with placement of midurethral sling for the surgical treatment of SUI at HCAM. 218 patients were studied; clinical-demographics, perioperative, intraoperative, and postoperative complications including monitoring data and clinical improvement of SUI were recorded to assess the efficacy and safety of methods. Results: the TOT group prevailed in effectiveness with no statistically significant difference with respect to the TVT group in assessing subjective and objective clinical improvement (87% vs 82 % and 92 % vs 90 % respectively). Bladder perforation occurred in 14% in the TVT group vs. 0.5 % of the TOT group. Severe complications leading to re operation were mainly presented in the TVT group (4.8 % vs 2.25 % / p=0.356). Conclusions: comparatively, both techniques showed similar efficacy over time of study. However TOT would have fewer complications, bladder perforation being the most important. In addition, TVT required longer operative time, hospital stay.
