Evolving Indications for Heart-Lung Transplant in Spain.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of heart-lung transplant (HLT) are worse than those of heart transplant (HT) and lung transplant alone; this and the availability of mechanical assistance have meant that the indications for HLT have been changing. This study aims to analyze the evolution of indications for HLT in a country of 47 million inhabitants. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of all HLTs performed in Spain (performed in 2 centers) from 1990 to 2020. The total number of patients included was 1751 (HT 1673 and HLT 78). After clinical adjustment, overall survival was compared between the 2 groups. Seven etiological subgroups were considered within the HLT group: (1) cardiomyopathy with pulmonary hypertension (CM + PH);, (2) Eisenmenger syndrome, (3) congenital heart disease without Eisenmenger syndrome, (4) idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), (5) cystic fibrosis, (6) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or emphysema), and (7) diffuse interstitial lung disease. RESULTS: There were a large number of differences between patients with HLT vs HT. HLT had a 2.69-fold increased probability of death in the first year compared with HT. The indications for HLT have changed over the years. In the recent period the indications are mainly congenital heart disease and Eisenmenger syndrome, with some cases of CM + PH. Other indications for HLT have virtually disappeared, mainly lung diseases (IPAH, COPD, cystic fibrosis). Median survival was low in CM + PH (18 days), diffuse interstitial lung disease (29 days), and ischemic heart disease (114 days); intermediate in Eisenmenger syndrome (600 days); and longer in IPAH, COPD and/or emphysema, and cystic fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: HLT is a procedure with high mortality. This and mechanical assists mean that the indications have changed over the years. Etiological analysis is of utmost interest to take advantage of organs and improve survival.

Experiencia con una asistencia ventricular pulsátil de larga duración como puente al trasplante cardiaco en adultos / Experience with a long-term pulsatile ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplant in adults

Introducción y objetivos: La mayoría de los dispositivos de asistencia ventricular (DAV) de larga duración utilizados actualmente son intracorpóreos y de flujo continuo. Sus principales inconvenientes son el coste elevado y la imposibilidad de ofrecer soporte biventricular. El objetivo de este estudio es describir los resultados de una estrategia de implante de un DAV paracorpóreo de flujo pulsátil como puente al trasplante (PAT) en pacientes adultos. Métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de las características, complicaciones y resultados de una serie unicéntrica de pacientes consecutivos tratados con el DAV EXCOR como PAT entre 2009 y 2015. Resultados: En este periodo se implantaron 25 DAV, 6 de ellos biventriculares. En 12 pacientes la indicación fue directamente PAT y en 13 puente a la decisión debido a la presencia de contraindicaciones potencialmente reversibles o posibilidad de recuperación. Veinte pacientes (80%) alcanzaron el objetivo del trasplante cardiaco tras una mediana de soporte de 112 días (rango 8-239). Las principales complicaciones fueron: infecciosas (52% de los pacientes), neurológicas (32%, la mitad de ellas mortales), hemorrágicas (28%) y fallo del DAV que obligó a cambiar algún componente de este (28%). Conclusiones: El 80% de los pacientes tratados con el DAV EXCOR como PAT alcanzaron el objetivo tras una mediana de soporte de casi 4 meses. Las complicaciones más frecuentes fueron las infecciosas y las más graves las neurológicas. El empleo de estos DAV de flujo pulsátil como PAT, en nuestro medio, es una estrategia factible que consigue resultados similares a los DAV de flujo continuo (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Most long-term ventricular assist devices (VADs) that are currently implanted are intracorporeal continuous-flow devices. Their main limitations include their high cost and inability to provide biventricular support. The aim of this study was to describe the results of using paracorporeal pulsatile-flow VADs as a bridge to transplant (BTT) in adult patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the characteristics, complications, and outcomes of a single-center case series of consecutive patients treated with the EXCOR VAD as BTT between 2009 and 2015. Results: During the study period, 25 VADs were implanted, 6 of them biventricular. Ventricular assist devices were indicated directly as a BTT in 12 patients and as a bridge to decision in 13 due to the presence of potentially reversible contraindications or chance of heart function recovery. Twenty patients (80%) were successfully bridged to heart transplant after a median of 112 days (range, 8-239). The main complications included infectious (52% of patients), neurological events (32%, half of them fatal), bleeding (28%), and VAD malfunction requiring component replacement (28%). Conclusions: Eighty percent of patients with the EXCOR VAD as BTT achieved the goal after an average of almost 4 months of support. The most frequent complications were infectious, and the most severe were neurological. In our enivonment, the use of these pulsatile-flow VAD as BTT is a feasible strategy that obtains similar outcomes to those of intracorporeal continuous-flow devices (AU)

Experience With a Long-term Pulsatile Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Heart Transplant in Adults.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Most long-term ventricular assist devices (VADs) that are currently implanted are intracorporeal continuous-flow devices. Their main limitations include their high cost and inability to provide biventricular support. The aim of this study was to describe the results of using paracorporeal pulsatile-flow VADs as a bridge to transplant (BTT) in adult patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the characteristics, complications, and outcomes of a single-center case series of consecutive patients treated with the EXCOR VAD as BTT between 2009 and 2015. RESULTS: During the study period, 25 VADs were implanted, 6 of them biventricular. Ventricular assist devices were indicated directly as a BTT in 12 patients and as a bridge to decision in 13 due to the presence of potentially reversible contraindications or chance of heart function recovery. Twenty patients (80%) were successfully bridged to heart transplant after a median of 112 days (range, 8-239). The main complications included infectious (52% of patients), neurological events (32%, half of them fatal), bleeding (28%), and VAD malfunction requiring component replacement (28%). CONCLUSIONS: Eighty percent of patients with the EXCOR VAD as BTT achieved the goal after an average of almost 4 months of support. The most frequent complications were infectious, and the most severe were neurological. In our enivonment, the use of these pulsatile-flow VAD as BTT is a feasible strategy that obtains similar outcomes to those of intracorporeal continuous-flow devices.