Incidence of anastomotic leakage using powered circular staplers versus manual circular staplers for left colorectal anastomosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal anastomotic leakage causes severe consequences for patients and healthcare system as it will lead to increased consumption of hospital resources and costs. Technological improvements in anastomotic devices could reduce the incidence of leakage and its economic impact. The aim of the present study was to assess if the use of a new powered circular stapler is cost-effective. METHOD: This observational study included patients undergoing left-sided circular stapled colorectal anastomosis between January 2018 and December 2021. Propensity score matching was carried out to create two comparable groups depending on whether the anastomosis was performed using a manual or powered circular device. The rate of anastomotic leakage, its severity, the consumption of hospital resources, and its cost were the main outcome measures. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the powered circular stapler versus manual circular staplers was performed. RESULTS: A total of 330 patients were included in the study, 165 in each group. Anastomotic leakage rates were significantly different (p = 0.012): 22 patients (13.3%) in the manual group versus 8 patients (4.8%) in the powered group. The effectiveness of the powered stapler and manual stapler was 98.27% and 93.69%, respectively. The average cost per patient in the powered group was €6238.38, compared with €9700.12 in the manual group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was - €74,915.28 per patient without anastomotic complications. CONCLUSION: The incremental cost of powered circular stapler compared with manual devices was offset by the savings from lowered incidence and cost of management of anastomotic leaks.

Health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a Spanish study based on patient reports.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a disease that significantly affects the quality of life and welfare of patients. SLE patients can be classified into multimorbidity levels using Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs) to help to incorporate predictive models of health needs. The goal of this study was to correlate CRGs with health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and costs in SLE patients. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to SLE patients in four hospital centers of the Valencian Community (Spain) between October 2015 and March 2016. The factors studied included HR-QoL (EQ-5D-5L and VAS), disease activity (SLAI/SELENA), damage (SLICC/ACR), and severity (IGK). RESULTS: The patients (N = 190, 92.06% female, age (mean ± SD) 47.23 ± 13.43 years) were sorted according to health status in nine CRGs. We found that most SLE patients (> 70%) were in CRGs 5 and 6. The main HR-QoL issues in these patients were related to mobility, ability to perform usual activities, and pain/discomfort. The scores (mean ± SD) for EQ-5D-5L and VAS were 0.74 ± 0.25 and 65.67 ± 23.52, respectively. We found that the age of the patients negatively affected their HR-QoL (r = - 0.266). SLE direct costs per patient increased with each CRG group, representing 71.92% of the total costs, while indirect costs were highly variable. The average cost per patient with SLE amounted to €8432.85 (year 2014). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' quality of life is related with age, disease activity, damage, and severity. Age was the parameter which most affects HR-QoL. Most costs of SLE are concentrated in two CRGs in which the HR-QoL deteriorates sharply.