Prevalence and Treatment of Postpartum Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Many women present for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after childbirth. This systematic review describes the efficacy of treatment options for SUI initiated during the 12 months after delivery. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify studies comparing treatment options for SUI initiated in the 12 months after parturition. We searched MEDLINE from inception to February 2019, using Medical Subject Heading terms related to pregnancy and urinary incontinence. Preintervention and postintervention populations were compared using analysis of variance with Fisher least significant difference method used to determine efficacy between groups. Grades for Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to categorize quality of evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low. RESULTS: We double screened 4548 abstracts, identifying 98 articles for full-text review. Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included. Compared with a control group, the 4 interventions identified outperformed the control group (P < 0.001) using Fisher (with effect sizes noted): (1) supervised pelvic floor physical therapy (0.76), (2) electrical stimulation (0.77), (3) home physical therapy (PT) (0.44), and (4) surgery (not applicable). Based on Grades for Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment, there was moderate evidence to support PT and electrical stimulation, with insufficient evidence for surgery. There were no significant differences in parity, age, or body mass index via analysis of variance. The overall strength of evidence is poor for the treatment of postpartum SUI; more data are needed to fully evaluate other treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: All identified interventions demonstrated greater improvement for postpartum SUI over no treatment. Supervised PT ± electrostimulation was the most effective nonsurgical intervention.

Traveling for rights: Abortion trends in New Mexico after passage of restrictive Texas legislation.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of abortions provided to patients from Texas in New Mexico before and after the 2013 enactment of Texas House Bill 2 (HB2), an omnibus bill of abortion restrictions, and to compare the gestational ages at which Texans presented for abortion in New Mexico before and after HB2. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a chart review of Texas and New Mexico patients obtaining an abortion in New Mexico abortion clinics before HB 2 was signed and implemented (time period 1: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012) and after HB 2 went into effect (time period 2: May 1, 2014 to April 30, 2015). We used random sampling of corresponding 7-day periods (by week number during the one-year sample) to obtain data until we reached the desired sample of at least 300 patients. We compared proportions of individuals from Texas obtaining abortions and the gestational age at which they presented in the two time periods. RESULTS: We abstracted data from 350 and 300 Texas and New Mexico patients, respectively. The proportion of procedures provided to women from Texas increased from 10 (3%) pre-HB2 to 43 (14%) post-HB2 (p < 0.0001). The proportion of procedures in Texas patients at 13 to ≤24 weeks increased from 1 of 29 (3%) pre-HB2 to 10 of 38 (26%) post-HB2 (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The proportion of Texans scheduling abortions in New Mexico within the first 24 weeks of gestation increased after passage of HB2. Restrictive legislation may force more people to travel across state lines to obtain abortion care. IMPLICATIONS: Patients residing in Texas and seeking abortion care in Texas experienced barriers to abortion care, likely related to restrictions imposed by HB2.