Application of behavior data to predictive exploratory models of metritis self-cure and treatment failure in dairy cows.

The objective was to evaluate the performance of exploratory models containing routinely available on-farm data, behavior data, and the combination of both to predict metritis self-cure (SC) and treatment failure (TF). Holstein cows (n = 1,061) were fitted with a collar-mounted automated-health monitoring device (AHMD) from -21 ± 3 to 60 ± 3 d relative to calving to monitor rumination time and activity. Cows were examined for diagnosis of metritis at 4 ± 1, 7 ± 1, and 9 ± 1 d in milk (DIM). Cows diagnosed with metritis (n = 132), characterized by watery, fetid, reddish/brownish vaginal discharge (VD), were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 treatments: control (CON; n = 62), no treatment at the time of metritis diagnosis (d 0); or ceftiofur (CEF; n = 70), subcutaneous injection of 6.6 mg/kg of ceftiofur crystalline-free acid on d 0 and 3 relative to diagnosis. Cure was determined 12 d after diagnosis and was considered when VD became mucoid and not fetid. Cows in CON were used to determine SC, and cows in CEF were used to determine TF. Univariable analyses were performed using farm-collected data (parity, calving season, calving-related disorders, body condition score, rectal temperature, and DIM at metritis diagnosis) and behavior data (i.e., daily averages of rumination time, activity generated by AHMD, and derived variables) to assess their association with metritis SC or TF. Variables with P-values ≤0.20 were included in the multivariable logistic regression exploratory models. To predict SC, the area under the curve (AUC) for the exploratory model containing only data routinely available on-farm was 0.75. The final exploratory model to predict SC combining routinely available on-farm data and behavior data increased the AUC to 0.87, with sensitivity (Se) of 89% and specificity (Sp) of 77%. To predict TF, the AUC for the exploratory model containing only data routinely available on-farm was 0.90. The final exploratory model combining routinely available on-farm data and behavior data increased the AUC to 0.93, with Se of 93% and Sp of 87%. Cross-validation analysis revealed that generalizability of the exploratory models was poor, which indicates that the findings are applicable to the conditions of the present exploratory study. In summary, the addition of behavior data contributed to increasing the prediction of SC and TF. Developing and validating accurate prediction models for SC could lead to a reduction in antimicrobial use, whereas accurate prediction of cows that would have TF may allow for better management decisions.

Targeted reproductive management for lactating Holstein cows: Reducing the reliance on exogenous reproductive hormones.

Adoption of automated monitoring devices (AMD) affords the opportunity to tailor reproductive management according to the cow's needs. We hypothesized that a targeted reproductive management (TRM) would reduce the use of reproductive hormones while increasing the percentage of cows pregnant 305 d in milk (DIM). Holstein cows from 2 herds (n = 1,930) were fitted with an AMD at 251.0 ± 0.4 d of gestation. Early-postpartum estrus characteristics (EPEC; intense estrus = heat index ≥70; 0 = minimum, 100 = maximum) of multiparous cows were evaluated at 40 (herd 1) or 41 (herd 2) DIM and EPEC of primiparous cows were evaluated at 54 (herd 1) or 55 (herd 2) DIM. Control cows received the first artificial insemination at fixed time (TAI; primiparous, herd 1 = 82 and herd 2 = 83 DIM; multiparous, herd 1 = 68 and herd 2 = 69 DIM) following the Double-Ovsynch (DOV) protocol. Cows enrolled in the TRM treatment were managed as follows: (1) cows with at least one intense estrus were inseminated upon AMD detected estrus for 42 d and, if not inseminated, were enrolled in the DOV protocol; and (2) cows without an intense estrus were enrolled in the DOV protocol at the same time as cows in the control treatment. Control cows were re-inseminated based on visual or patch aided detection of estrus, whereas TRM cows were re-inseminated as described for control cows with the aid of the AMD. Cows received a GnRH injection 27 ± 3 d after insemination and, if diagnosed as nonpregnant, completed the 5-d Cosynch protocol and received TAI 35 ± 3 d after insemination. Among cows in the TRM treatment, 55.8 and 42.9% of primiparous and multiparous cows, respectively, received the first insemination in spontaneous estrus. The interaction between treatment and parity affected pregnancy 67 d after the first AI (primiparous: control = 37.6%, TRM = 27.4%; multiparous: control = 41.0%, TRM = 44.7%). The TRM treatment increased re-insemination in estrus (control = 48.3%, TRM = 70.5%). Pregnancy 67 d after re-inseminations tended to be affected by the interaction between treatment and EPEC (no intense estrus: control = 25.3%, TRM = 32.0%; intense estrus: control = 32.9%, TRM = 32.2%). The interaction between treatment and EPEC affected pregnancy by 305 DIM (no intense estrus: control = 80.8%, TRM = 88.2%; intense estrus: control = 87.1%, TRM = 86.1%). Treatment did not affect the number of reproductive hormone treatments among cows that had not had an intense estrus (control = 10.5 ± 0.3, TRM = 9.1 ± 0.2 treatments/cow), but cows in the TRM treatment that had an intense estrus received fewer reproductive hormone treatments than cows in the control treatment (2.0 ± 0.1 vs. 9.6 ± 0.2 treatments/cow). Selecting multiparous cows for first AI in estrus based on EPEC reduced the use of reproductive hormones without impairing the likelihood of pregnancy to first AI. The use of AMD for re-insemination expedited the establishment of pregnancy among cows that did not display an intense estrus early postpartum.

Technical note: Validation of a system for monitoring individual behavior of Holstein cows.

The objectives of the 2 studies reported herein were to validate the accuracy of an automated monitoring device (AMD) to detect side lying, resting, activity, rumination, eating, walking, and panting in nonlactating and lactating dairy cows. Additionally, we aimed to determine whether the total time per cow-state recorded by the AMD within a 30-min interval corresponds to the total time per cow-state recorded simultaneously by visual observation. Study personnel (n = 2) observed pregnant nonlactating Holstein cows (n = 10) for 30 min in the morning and 30 min in the afternoon for 6 consecutive days and recorded continuously each cow-state. In study 2, study personnel (n = 2) observed lactating Holstein cows (n = 10) for 30 min in the morning and 30 min in the afternoon for 6 consecutive days. In both studies, cow-state was recorded every second, and within 1 min, the most prevalent cow-state was considered to be the behavior presented by the cow during that interval. Using the observer as the gold standard, test characteristics were calculated for the minute-by-minute interval analyses. For the 30-min interval analyses, the concordance correlation coefficient (pc) and the coefficient of determination (R2) between the total minutes for each cow-state recorded by the observer and the AMD were calculated. In study 1, for the minute-by-minute interval analyses, test characteristics were high for rumination (≥90.1%) and eating (≥73.8%), moderate for resting (≥62.9%), but negligible for medium activity (≥17%). For the 30-min interval analyses, the correlations between the total time of visual observations compared with the total time recorded by AMD for rumination (R2 = 0.97, pc = 0.98) and eating (R2 = 0.91, pc = 0.94) were very high, for resting (R2 = 0.77, pc = 0.79) was high, and for medium activity (R2 = 0.41, pc = 0.41) was low. In study 2, for the minute-by-minute interval analyses, test characteristics were high for rumination (≥79.4%), eating (≥74.2%), and resting (≥73.0%), but they were low for panting (≥31.3%) and negligible for medium activity (≥22.2%). For the 30-min interval analyses, the correlations were similar to study 1 (rumination: R2 = 0.85, pc = 0.91; eating: R2 = 0.95, pc = 0.97; resting: R2 = 0.84, pc = 0.90; medium activity: R2 = 0.44, pc = 0.57; and panting: R2 = 0.21, pc = 0.42). In summary, the AMD used in this study provided accurate data regarding resting, rumination, and eating of pregnant nonlactating and lactating Holstein cows.