The future of capitation: the physician role in managing change in practice.

Capitation-based reimbursement significantly influences the practice of medicine. As physicians, we need to assure that payment models do not jeopardize the care we provide when we accept higher levels of personal financial risk. In this paper, we review the literature relevant to capitation, consider the interaction of financial incentives with physician and medical risk, and conclude that primary care physicians need to work to assure that capitated systems incorporate checks and balances which protect both patients and providers. We offer the following proposals for individuals and groups considering capitated contracts: (1) reimbursement for primary care physicians should recognize both individual patient encounters and the administrative work of patient care management; (2) reimbursement for subspecialists should recognize both access to subspecialty knowledge and expertise as well as patient care encounters, but in some situations, subspecialists may provide the majority of care to individual patients and will be reimbursed as primary care providers; (3) groups of physicians should accept financial risk for patient care only if they have the tools and resources to manage the care; (4) physicians sharing risk for patient care should meet regularly to discuss care and resource management; and (5) physicians must disclose the financial relationships they have with health plans and medical care organizations, and engage patients and communities in discussions about resource allocation. As a payment model, capitation offers opportunities for primary care physicians to influence the future of health care by improving the management of resources at a local level.

Do resident and staff physicians differ in the types and costs of antihypertensive drugs they select?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the types and costs of drugs prescribed by resident and staff physicians treating patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, using a computer-based medical record database. SETTING: Primary care internal medicine clinic in a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Hypertensive patients seen by ten postgraduate year-1 (PGY-1) and PGY-2 primary care internal medicine residents and four staff physicians practicing in the same clinic. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The types and costs of antihypertensive drugs prescribed for the patients treated by resident and staff physicians were compared. A larger proportion of patients of resident physicians than of staff physicians were treated with calcium channel blockers [19(15%) vs. 40(4%), p less than 0.001]; residents prescribed thiazide diuretics less frequently and beta-blockers more frequently than did staff physicians, although these differences were not significant. The estimated average wholesale price of antihypertensive drugs for patients cared for by residents was 35% higher than that for patients cared for by staff physicians ($0.73 vs. $0.54, p = 0.048). This difference was not fully explained by differences in practice composition. CONCLUSIONS: Resident physicians in this study selected more expensive medications to treat hypertension than did their faculty preceptors, even when differences in practice composition were considered.

The diagnostic value of upper gastrointestinal radiography.

We reviewed the indications for and results of 788 consecutive upper gastrointestinal radiographs (UGIs) performed for ambulatory patients. Sixty-three percent of tests were ordered for the evaluation of abdominal pain, dyspepsia, or esophageal reflux. Of these tests, only 4.8% yielded results of major clinical importance to patient management. The yield for patients greater than 50 years of age was greater than for patients less than 50, 6.9 versus 3.0% (p = 0.04). There was a significant increase in yield with increasing age (chi trend = 11.6, p less than 0.001). Among patients with an indication of esophageal reflux alone (n = 62), there were no patients younger than age 60 with a test result that would significantly affect therapy or outcome. Among patients evaluated for fecal occult blood or weight loss (n = 120), 11.7% of tests ordered showed a finding of major clinical importance. In this group, the yield was higher in those greater than or equal to 50 years of age than in those less than 50, 14.7 versus 6.7%, (p = 0.2). These results indicate that UGIs ordered to evaluate pain or symptoms of esophageal reflux in the absence of bleeding or weight loss rarely yield results that significantly influence therapy. Such patients may be best served by an initial trial of empiric therapy or some other test. The UGI has greatest value when indications for it include bleeding or weight loss.

Is upper gastrointestinal radiography necessary in the initial management of uncomplicated dyspepsia? A randomized controlled trial comparing empiric antacid therapy plus patient reassurance with traditional care.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare two strategies for the evaluation and management of patients who have had acute dyspepsia for four days or more: empiric high-dose antacid therapy combined with patient reassurance (empiric care) versus therapy based on prompt upper gastrointestinal radiography (traditional care). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial. The patients in the empiric care group were reassured that upper gastrointestinal radiography was not necessary and were subsequently treated with high-dose empiric antacid therapy (15-30 ml of high-potency antacid one and three hours after meals and at bedtime). The traditional care group after meals and at bedtime). The traditional care group received upper gastrointestinal radiography as part of the initial evaluation. Subsequent treatment was determined by individual physicians based on test results. SETTINGS: Fee-for-service, hospital-based primary care practice and Veteran's Administration medical center outpatient clinic. PATIENTS: All patients were less than 70 years of age and without gastrointestinal bleeding, anemia, significant weight loss, or other specified symptoms of severe acid peptic disease. Fifty patients were randomized to traditional care, and 51 to empiric care. Pre-randomization clinical features were identical with the exception of sex distribution and baseline disability. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After six months of follow-up, there were no significant differences in symptom scores, disability, satisfaction, and quality of life measures (as measured by the Sickness Impact Profile scores) between the two groups. Findings were unchanged when adjusted for sex, study site, alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking. Of the radiographs obtained in the traditional care group, 13 (27%) showed duodenal ulcer disease, gastritis, or duodenitis. There were no serious complications of ulcer disease or therapy noted in either group. The average costs per patient associated with traditional care at one study site were greater, $286 versus $116 (p less than 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Select patients with dyspepsia receiving a combination of reassurance and empiric antacid therapy do as well as patients whose initial management strategy includes upper gastrointestinal radiography, at a substantially lower cost.

Medical diagnostic technology in the home.

This article studies the issues surrounding the assessment of several home diagnostic tests. First, the authors review the current data and proper use of fecal occult blood and pregnancy tests. Second, they evaluate the roles of blood and urine glucose monitoring in the management of diabetes mellitus and home pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension. The authors conclude that while home measurement of blood pressure or blood sugar can be recommended to improve compliance with medical programs, home fecal occult blood testing, while helpful, has not been fully investigated.

Discomfort and disability in upper respiratory tract infection.

Ambulatory patients with upper respiratory infection were studied to determine the relative contributions made by tissue pathology, psychologic and perceptual attributes, and demographic characteristics to reported discomfort and disability. Patients (n = 115) attending a medical walk-in clinic completed self-report questionnaires to assess somatization, anxiety, depression, hostility, amplification, discomfort, disability, and demographic characteristics. Clinicians rated the extent of disease apparent on physical examination. Using stepwise multiple regression, demographic factors and physical findings explained 25% of the variance in reported discomfort. The addition of somatization scores increased the variance explained to 49%. The best model, including somatization and amplification, accounted for 54% of the variance. A model composed of demographic characteristics, physical findings, and somatization accounted for 25% of the variance in reported disability. The authors conclude that psychologic variables are important in the experience of discomfort, even after the extent of physical disease and demographic characteristics have been taken into account.

The amplification of somatic symptoms.

We studied the role of somatosensory amplification, as measured by a self-report questionnaire, in symptomatology, overall discomfort, and disability in 115 patients with upper-respiratory-tract infections who visited an adult medical walk-in clinic. Multiple regression analyses indicated that amplification was a statistically significant predictor of the patients' localized but not systemic symptoms, of reported overall discomfort, and of their social and vocational disability. These relationships held true while controlling for differences in medical morbidity and sociodemographic characteristics. Amplification was closely related to, but distinct from, three measures of dysphoria: depression, anxiety, and hostility. The tendency to amplify a broad range of bodily sensations may therefore be an important factor in experiencing, reporting, and functioning with an acute and relatively mild medical illness.

The training of physicians outside the hospital.

The current ambulatory training of medical residents in the primary care program and the traditional program of the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, are described. All residents are assigned to work in a single medical group practice unit during their three years of training. Block outpatient rotations make up 32% of the primary care program and 6% of the traditional program schedules, while total ambulatory experiences, including weekly continuity sessions, make up 39% and 15%, respectively. Several components are important for a successful program. Above all is a vigorous group practice providing a sizable panel of patients with complex clinical problems from which residents can learn. Also important are financial support from the hospital and government or private grants and a commitment to outpatient teaching by the medical and nonmedical specialty staff.

The limited clinical value of home urine testing by diabetic patients.

To investigate the value of home urine glucose testing in assessing chronic diabetic glucose control, the authors compared patients' glycosuria patterns with their mean blood glucose (MBG) levels calculated from glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb Alc). One hundred and twenty-one patients who regularly checked their urines reported on the frequencies of glycosuria over the preceding ten weeks. There was substantial overlap in the glycosuria patterns of patients at different levels of MBG. Glycosuria was not detectable in only 44% of patients with good control (MBG less than or equal to 150 mg/dl). The probability of such good control given no glycosuria was only 26%. Similarly, frequent glycosuria was reported by only 27% of patients with poor control (MGB greater than 250 mg/dl). The probability of such poor control given frequent glycosuria was only 34%. Because home urine testing cannot reliably identify good or poor control, it has a very limited role in assessing patients' chronic glucose control.

Empiric antacids and reassurance for acute dyspepsia.

The evaluation of ambulatory patients with dyspepsia frequently includes upper gastrointestinal radiographs (UGIs), a practice of unproven value in low-risk patients. To assess an alternative management strategy without UGIs, 28 patients with upper abdominal pain seen in an adult medical walk-in practice were treated with high-dose antacid therapy for three weeks. The clinical course on antacid therapy was good; 68% of patients reported substantial improvement. Initial requests for UGIs were high among both patients and physicians. Following empiric antacid therapy, requests for UGIs fell from 68% to 32% for patients (p = 0.05) and from 71% to 21% for physicians (p = 0.001). No serious complications were detected after 18 months of follow up. Direct medical charges were reduced by 37%. Empiric antacid therapy for patients at low risk for serious disease relieves dyspepsia and reduces both patient and physician requests for UGIs.

Comparing ambulatory care practices of primary care and traditional medicine residents.

Although special residency programs preparing internists for primary care have been in existence for a decade, little is known about whether these tracks have achieved their goals. As part of a multicenter evaluation of ambulatory care at four university hospitals, 1,040 patient care encounters were reviewed for 16 primary-care and 41 traditional medicine residents. Using a chart-based audit, the authors examined 16 discrete items of patient care to assess resident management in the following areas: screening for colorectal carcinoma, management of hypertension, benzodiazepine drug prescribing, and management of chronic lung disease. Their hypothesis that primary care residents would score higher than traditional medicine residents in the areas of screening, prevention, and prescribing of drugs was not supported. There was no association between type of training and performance of a task with the following exception: second-year primary care residents screened for colorectal carcinoma in 86% (126) of patients whose charts were audited, while second-year traditional medicine residents did so in 77% (160) (P less than 0.025). This difference was not maintained when the residents were reaudited 1 year later. Both groups of residents scored high in all areas with the following exceptions: documentation of the amount of sedative dispensed and immunization of susceptible patients against pneumococcus and influenza. The ambulatory practices of both groups of residents exceeded expectations, probably because of the wider influence of primary care training.

The clinical information value of the glycosylated hemoglobin assay.

We evaluated the clinical information value of the glycosylated hemoglobin assay by comparing it with practitioners' estimates of glucose control over the preceding 10 weeks in 216 patients with diabetes. Twenty-four per cent of the practitioners' estimates, which were based on historical and laboratory data collected during a routine office visit, differed by more than +/- 75 mg per deciliter from the actual mean blood glucose levels calculated with the glycosylated hemoglobin assay. One third of the mean blood glucose concentration fell outside the confidence intervals physicians used to bound their estimates. When examined individually or in the aggregate, historical information, such as polyuria, nocturia, or home urine testing for glucose, and laboratory information, such as fasting or random blood glucose levels, were weak predictors of the actual mean concentration of blood glucose. We conclude that the glycosylated hemoglobin assay provides information about the degree of long-term glucose control that is not otherwise obtainable in the usual clinical setting.

The clinical course of acute hepatitis in the elderly patient.

We have reviewed the clinical course of acute hepatitis in 23 patients 60 years or older. There were four patients with acute hepatitis B, two patients with sporadic hepatitis, and 17 patients with posttransfusion non-B hepatitis. Hepatitis, in the latter group, is presumed to have been caused by the transmission of non-A, non-B hepatitis agents by blood transfusion. Regardless of the cause, the acute episode of clinical hepatitis resolved in 20 patients. Eight patients had completely normal liver function test results on follow-up. Eleven patients had chronic elevations of bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, or SGOT values without clinical or biochemical evidence of deterioration of their condition during 20.5 +/- 3.5 months (mean +/- SEM) of observation. The majority of patients with posttransfusion non-B hepatitis either recovered spontaneously or entered into a chronic phase characterized by mildly or intermittently abnormal liver function test results without clinical deterioration of their condition.